‘Groping through the fog’: a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section)
Vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) is a relevant question for a large number of women due to the internationally rising Caesarean section (CS) rate. There is a great deal of research based on quantitative studies but few qualitative studies about women's experiences.
A metasynthesis based on the interpretative meta ethnography method was conducted. The inclusion criterion was peer-review qualitative articles from different disciplines about women's experiences of VBAC. Eleven articles were checked for quality, and eight articles were included in the synthesis.
The included studies were from Australia (four), UK (three), and US (one), and studied women's experience in relation to different aspects of VBAC; decision-making whether to give birth vaginally, the influence of health professionals on decision-making, reason for trying a vaginal birth, experiences when choosing VBAC, experiences of giving birth vaginally, and giving birth with CS when preferring VBAC. The main results are presented with the metaphor groping through the fog; for the women the issue of VBAC is like being in a fog, where decision-making and information from the health care system and professionals, both during pregnancy and the birth, is unclear and contrasting. The results are further presented with four themes: ‘to be involved in decision about mode of delivery is difficult but important,’ ‘vaginal birth has several positive aspects mainly described by women,’ ‘vaginal birth after CS is a risky project,’ and ‘own strong responsibility for giving birth vaginally'.
In order to promote VBAC, more studies are needed from different maternity settings and countries about women's experiences. Women need evidence-based information not only about the risks involved but also positive aspects of VBAC.
- Graviditeter, förlossningar och nyfödda barn – Medicinska födelseregistret. Pregnancies, Deliveries and Newborn Infants; The Swedish Medical Birth Register
- Emmett, CL, Shaw, ARG, Montgomey, AA, Murphy, DJ (2009) Women’s experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks. BJOG 113: pp. 1438-1445 CrossRef
- Perinatal Statistics Report 2009. Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin
- European Perinatal Health Report.
- Rozen, G, Ugoni, AM, Sheehan, PM (2011) A new perspective on VBAC: a retrospective cohort study. Women Birth 24: pp. 3-9 CrossRef
- Wang, HH, Chung, UL, Sung, MS, Wu, SM (2006) Development of a Web-based childbirth education program for vaginal birth after C-section (VBAC) mothers. J Nurs Res 14: pp. 1-8 CrossRef
- German Hospital Quality Report.
- Edozien, L (2007) Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: what information should women be given?. Clinical Risk 13: pp. 127-130 CrossRef
- Baxter, L, Davies, S (2010) Balacing risk and choice in childbirth after caesarean section. Br J Midwifery 18: pp. 638-643
- David, S, Fenwick, J, Bayes, S, Martin, T (2010) A qualitative analysis of the content of telephone calls made by women to a dedicated ‘Next Birth After Caesarean’ antenatal clinic. Women Birth 23: pp. 166-171 CrossRef
- Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: new insights. Department of Health and Human Service, Rockville, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S
- Foureur, M, Ryan, C, Nicholl, M, Homer, C (2010) Inconsistent evidence: analysis of six national guidelines for vaginal birth after caesarean section. Birth 37: pp. 3-10 CrossRef
- McGrath, P, Phillips, E, Vaughan, G (2010) Vaginal birth after Caesarean risk decision-making: Australian findings on the mothers'perspective. Int J Nurs Pract 16: pp. 274-281 CrossRef
- Cox, B (2007) Women's perceptions of their access to, and value of, information as part of their decision making on mode of birth following a previous caesarean section delivery. MIDIRS, Midwifery Digest 17: pp. 159-168
- Frost, J, Shaw, A, Montgomery, A, Murphy, DJ (2009) Women's views on the use of decision aids for decision making about the method of delivery following a previous caesarean section: qualitative interview study. BJOG 116: pp. 896-905 CrossRef
- Farnworth, A, Robson, SC, Thomson, RG, Burges Watson, D, Murtagh, MJ (2008) Decision support for women choosing mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: a developmental study. Patient Educ Couns 71: pp. 116-124 CrossRef
- Moffat, MA, Bell, JS, Porter, MA, Lawton, S, Hundley, V, Danielian, P, Bhattacharya, S (2007) Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: a qualitative study. BJOG 114: pp. 86-93 CrossRef
- Phillips, E, McGrath, P, Vaughan, G (2009–2010) ‘I wanted desperately to have a natural birth’: Mothers' insights on vaginal birth after Caesarean (VBAC). Contemp Nurse 34: pp. 77-84 CrossRef
- Fenwick, J, Gamble, J, Hauck, Y (2007) Believing in birth – choosing VBAC: the childbirth expectations of a self-selected cohort of Australian women. J Clin Nurs 16: pp. 1561-1570 CrossRef
- Meddings, F, Phipps, F, Haith-Cooper, M, Haigh, M (2006) Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): exploring women’s perceptions. J Clin Nurs 16: pp. 160-167 CrossRef
- Noblit, GW, Hare, RD (1988) Meta ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. SAGE, Newbury Park, CA
- Paterson, BL, Thorne, SE, Canam, C, Jillings, C (2001) Metastudy of qualitative research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Sage, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA
- Bondas, T, Hall, E (2007) A decade of metasynthesis research. Int J Qual Stud on Health and Well-being 2: pp. 101-113 CrossRef
- Sandelowski, M, Barroso, J (2007) Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer, New York
- Thorne, S, Jensen, L, Kearney, MH, Noblit, G, Sandelowski, M (2004) Qualitative Metasynthesis: Reflections on Methodological Orientation and Ideological Agenda. Qual Health Res 14: pp. 1342-1365 CrossRef
- Bondas, T, Hall, E (2007) Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qual Health Res 17: pp. 113-121 CrossRef
- Tong, A, Sainsbury, P, Craig, J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J for Qual Health 19: pp. 349-357 CrossRef
- Walsh, D, Downe, S (2006) Appraising the quality of qualitative research. Midwifery 22: pp. 108-119 CrossRef
- McGrath, P, Phillips, E, Vaughan, G (2010) Speaking out! Qualitative insights on the experiences of mothers who wanted a vaginal birth after birth by caesarean section. Patient 3: pp. 25-32 CrossRef
- Goodhall, KE, McVittie, C, Magil, M (2009) Birth choice following primary Caesarean section: mothers’ perceptions of the influence of health professionals on decision-making. J Reprod Infant Psychol 27: pp. 4-14 CrossRef
- Ridley, RT, Davis, PA, Bright, JH, Sinclair, D (2002) What Influences a Woman to Choose Vaginal Birth After Cesarean?. JOGNN 31: pp. 665-672
- Béhague, DP, Victora, CG, Barros, FC (2002) Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. BMJ 324: pp. 942 CrossRef
- Davis-Floyd, R (2001) The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 75: pp. 5-23 CrossRef
- Downe, S (2008) Normal childbirth: evidence and debate. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, Edinburgh
- Larkin, P, Begley, C, Devane, D (2009) Women’s experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery 25: pp. e49-e59 CrossRef
- Callister, LC (2004) Making meaning: women’s birth narratives. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 33: pp. 508-518 CrossRef
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/12/85/prepub
- ‘Groping through the fog’: a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section)
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Online Date
- August 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Qualitative studies
- Women's experiences
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institute of Health and Care Sciences at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, S-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden
- 2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
- 3. Midwifery Research and Education Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- 4. Faculty of Professional Studies, University of Nordland, Bodo, Norway