‘Groping through the fog’: a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section)
Vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) is a relevant question for a large number of women due to the internationally rising Caesarean section (CS) rate. There is a great deal of research based on quantitative studies but few qualitative studies about women's experiences.
A metasynthesis based on the interpretative meta ethnography method was conducted. The inclusion criterion was peer-review qualitative articles from different disciplines about women's experiences of VBAC. Eleven articles were checked for quality, and eight articles were included in the synthesis.
The included studies were from Australia (four), UK (three), and US (one), and studied women's experience in relation to different aspects of VBAC; decision-making whether to give birth vaginally, the influence of health professionals on decision-making, reason for trying a vaginal birth, experiences when choosing VBAC, experiences of giving birth vaginally, and giving birth with CS when preferring VBAC. The main results are presented with the metaphor groping through the fog; for the women the issue of VBAC is like being in a fog, where decision-making and information from the health care system and professionals, both during pregnancy and the birth, is unclear and contrasting. The results are further presented with four themes: ‘to be involved in decision about mode of delivery is difficult but important,’ ‘vaginal birth has several positive aspects mainly described by women,’ ‘vaginal birth after CS is a risky project,’ and ‘own strong responsibility for giving birth vaginally'.
In order to promote VBAC, more studies are needed from different maternity settings and countries about women's experiences. Women need evidence-based information not only about the risks involved but also positive aspects of VBAC.
- Socialstyrelsen (National Board of Health and Welfare): Graviditeter, förlossningar och nyfödda barn – Medicinska födelseregistret. Pregnancies, Deliveries and Newborn Infants; The Swedish Medical Birth Register; 2009. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2009/2009-12-11/2009-12-11summary
- Emmett CL, Shaw ARG, Montgomey AA, Murphy DJ: Women’s experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks. BJOG 2009, 113:1438–1445. CrossRef
- Economic and Social Research Institute: Perinatal Statistics Report 2009. Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute; 2011.
- EURO-PERISTAT Project: European Perinatal Health Report. 2008. http://www.europeristat.com
- Rozen G, Ugoni AM, Sheehan PM: A new perspective on VBAC: a retrospective cohort study. Women Birth 2011, 24:3–9. CrossRef
- Wang HH, Chung UL, Sung MS, Wu SM: Development of a Web-based childbirth education program for vaginal birth after C-section (VBAC) mothers. J Nurs Res 2006, 14:1–8. CrossRef
- AQUA (Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH): German Hospital Quality Report. 2010. http://www.sqg.de/sqg/upload/CONTENT/EN/Quality-Report/AQUA-German-Hospital-Quality-Report-2010.pdf
- Edozien L: Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: what information should women be given? Clinical Risk 2007, 13:127–130. CrossRef
- Baxter L, Davies S: Balacing risk and choice in childbirth after caesarean section. Br J Midwifery 2010, 18:638–643.
- David S, Fenwick J, Bayes S, Martin T: A qualitative analysis of the content of telephone calls made by women to a dedicated ‘Next Birth After Caesarean’ antenatal clinic. Women Birth 2010, 23:166–171. CrossRef
- Guise: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: new insights. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S: Department of Health and Human Service, Rockville; 2010. http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/vbacup/vbacup.pdf
- Foureur M, Ryan C, Nicholl M, Homer C: Inconsistent evidence: analysis of six national guidelines for vaginal birth after caesarean section. Birth 2010, 37:3–10. CrossRef
- McGrath P, Phillips E, Vaughan G: Vaginal birth after Caesarean risk decision-making: Australian findings on the mothers'perspective. Int J Nurs Pract 2010, 16:274–281. CrossRef
- Cox B: Women's perceptions of their access to, and value of, information as part of their decision making on mode of birth following a previous caesarean section delivery. MIDIRS, Midwifery Digest 2007, 17:159–168.
- Frost J, Shaw A, Montgomery A, Murphy DJ: Women's views on the use of decision aids for decision making about the method of delivery following a previous caesarean section: qualitative interview study. BJOG 2009, 116:896–905. CrossRef
- Farnworth A, Robson SC, Thomson RG, Burges Watson D, Murtagh MJ: Decision support for women choosing mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: a developmental study. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 71:116–124. CrossRef
- Moffat MA, Bell JS, Porter MA, Lawton S, Hundley V, Danielian P, Bhattacharya S: Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: a qualitative study. BJOG 2007, 114:86–93. CrossRef
- Phillips E, McGrath P, Vaughan G: ‘I wanted desperately to have a natural birth’: Mothers' insights on vaginal birth after Caesarean (VBAC). Contemp Nurse 2009–2010, 34:77–84. CrossRef
- Fenwick J, Gamble J, Hauck Y: Believing in birth – choosing VBAC: the childbirth expectations of a self-selected cohort of Australian women. J Clin Nurs 2007, 16:1561–1570. CrossRef
- Meddings F, Phipps F, Haith-Cooper, MHaigh J: Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): exploring women’s perceptions. J Clin Nurs 2006, 16:160–167. CrossRef
- Noblit GW, Hare RD: Meta ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. CA: SAGE, Newbury Park; 1988.
- Paterson BL, Thorne SE, Canam C, Jillings C: Metastudy of qualitative research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001.
- Bondas T, Hall E: A decade of metasynthesis research. Int J Qual Stud on Health and Well-being 2007, 2:101–113. CrossRef
- Sandelowski M, Barroso J: Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer; 2007.
- Thorne S, Jensen L, Kearney MH, Noblit G, Sandelowski M: Qualitative Metasynthesis: Reflections on Methodological Orientation and Ideological Agenda. Qual Health Res 2004, 14:1342–1365. CrossRef
- Bondas T, Hall E: Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qual Health Res 2007, 17:113–121. CrossRef
- Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J: Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J for Qual Health 2007, 19:349–357. CrossRef
- Walsh D, Downe S: Appraising the quality of qualitative research. Midwifery 2006, 22:108–119. CrossRef
- McGrath P, Phillips E, Vaughan G: Speaking out! Qualitative insights on the experiences of mothers who wanted a vaginal birth after birth by caesarean section. Patient 2010, 3:25–32. CrossRef
- Goodhall KE, McVittie C, Magil M: Birth choice following primary Caesarean section: mothers’ perceptions of the influence of health professionals on decision-making. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2009, 27:4–14. CrossRef
- Ridley RT, Davis PA, Bright JH, Sinclair D: What Influences a Woman to Choose Vaginal Birth After Cesarean? JOGNN 2002, 31:665–672.
- Béhague DP, Victora CG, Barros FC: Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. BMJ 2002, 324:942. CrossRef
- Davis-Floyd R: The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001, 75:5–23. CrossRef
- Downe S: Normal childbirth: evidence and debate. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2008.
- Larkin P, Begley C, Devane D: Women’s experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery 2009, 25:e49-e59. CrossRef
- Callister LC: Making meaning: women’s birth narratives. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2004, 33:508–518. CrossRef
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/12/85/prepub
- ‘Groping through the fog’: a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section)
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Online Date
- August 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Qualitative studies
- Women's experiences
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institute of Health and Care Sciences at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, S-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden
- 2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
- 3. Midwifery Research and Education Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- 4. Faculty of Professional Studies, University of Nordland, Bodo, Norway