Greenhouse gas emission reductions as a motivator of e85 purchases across market segments
Climate change has become a concern of both policy makers and consumers. Transportation constitutes a key source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; hence, alternative transportation fuels with reduced GHG emissions are of increasing interest as a potential strategy for decreasing emissions. However, consumer views on achieving emission reductions through the use of alternative fuels have not been widely studied. Understanding consumer preferences related to alternative fuels is relevant as new fuel options become available.
This study uses a two-step cluster analysis of opinion variables to segment consumers into four market segments (Potential activists, Environmentals, Neutrals, and National interests). Cluster profiles are examined based on demographics and opinion variables related to concerns about national security, food versus fuel, perceived effects of personal actions, perceived effects of other's actions, and environmental issues. Willingness to pay (WTP) for reductions in GHG emissions through purchases of ethanol blends is estimated via conjoint analysis from a national survey.
Estimates reveal that WTP varies in significance and magnitude across the four segments. In particular, the Environmentals market cluster is the only cluster consistently willing to pay a premium for emission reductions.
Market opinion clusters play a significant role in WTP for emission reductions through purchases of E85. Results suggest the existence of a potential niche market consisting of consumers with strong environmental concerns who are willing to pay a premium for renewable fuels in order to reduce GHG emissions.
- Environmental Protection Agency: 2012 Draft U.S. greenhouse gas inventory report. United States Environmental Protection Agency 2012. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/usinventoryreport.html. Accessed 16 March 2012
- International Energy Agency: CO 2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion 2011-highlights. International Environmental Agency 2011. http://iea.org/publications/free_new_Desc.asp?PUBS_ID=2450. Accessed 16 March 2012
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Consumer attitudes about renewable energy: trends and regional differences. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2011. http://apps3.eere.energy.gov/greenpower/pdfs/50988.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2012
- Pew Research Center Publications: Fueling both sides of the energy debate. Pew Research Center Publications 2010. http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1627/inconsistent-american-views-energy-environment-first-lady-still-popular-obama-and-palin-less-so. Accessed 16 March 2012
- New Scientist: Global warming: the buck stops here. New Scientist special report on climate poll 2007. http://www.rff.org/rff/Events/upload/28916_1.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2012
- Carroll J: Americans assess what they can do to reduce global warming. Gallup News Service 2007. http://www.gallup.com/poll/27298/Americans-Assess-What-They-Can-Reduce-Global-Warming.aspx. Accessed 16 March 2012
- Gallagher KS, Collantes G: Analysis of policies to reduce oil consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Cambridge; 2008.
- Energy Information Administration (EIA): Renewable energy. Energy Information Administration 2008. http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/infosheets/renewableenergy.html. Accessed 16 Feb 2011
- Alternative Fuels Data Center: Ethanol basics. Alternative Fuels Data Center 2009. http://www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/ethanol/basics.html. Accessed 23 Sept 2010
- Renewable Fuels Association: Accelerating industry innovation: 2012 ethanol industry outlook. Renewable Fuels Association 2012. http://ethanolrfa.3cdn.net/d4ad995ffb7ae8fbfe_1vm62ypzd.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2012
- Smith W: Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. J Mktg 1956,21(1):3–8.
- Claycamp HJ, Massy WF: A theory of market segmentation. J Mkting Res 1968,5(4):388–394.
- Wind Y: Issues and advances in segmentation research. J Mktg Res 1978,15(3):317–337.
- Baker GA, Burnham TA: Consumer response to genetically modified foods: market segment analysis and implications for producers and policy makers. J Ag & Res Econ 2001,26(2):387–403.
- Everitt BS: Cluster analysis. Oxford University Press, Inc, New York; 1993.
- Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ: Finding groups in data: an introduction to Cluster Analysis. Wiley, New Jersey; 2005.
- Sharma R, Kumar A: Marketing management. Atlantic Publishers & Distributors, Ltd., New Delhi; 1998.
- Punj G, Stewart DW: Cluster analysis in marketing research: review and suggestions for application. J Mktg Res 1983,20(2):134–148.
- Kuo R, Ho L, Hu C: Integration of self-organizing feature map and k-means algorithm for market segmentation. Comp & Oper Res 2002,29(11):1475–1493. CrossRef
- Van de Velde L, Verbeke W, Popp M, Buysse J, Van Huylenbroeck G: Perceived importance of fuel characteristics and its match with consumer beliefs about biofuels in Belgium. Ener Pol 2009,37(8):3183–3193. CrossRef
- Jeanty P, Hitzhusen F: Using stated preferences to estimate the environmental benefits of using biodiesel fuel in diesel engines. Paper resented at Biofuels, Food, and Feed Tradeoffs Conference, St. Louis, MO; 2007.
- Achtnicht M: German car buyers' willingness to pay to reduce CO2 emissions. ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 09–058. Centre for European Economic Research; 2009.
- MacKerron G, Egerton C, Gaskell C, Parpia A, Mourato S: Willingness to pay for carbon offset certification and co-benefits among (high-)flying young adults in the UK. Ener Pol 2009,37(4):1372–1381. CrossRef
- O'Connor R, Bord R, Yarnal B, Wiefek N: Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Soc Sci Quart 2002,83(1):1–17. CrossRef
- Roe B, Teisl M, Levy A, Russell M: US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity. Ener Pol 2001,29(11):917–925. CrossRef
- Dietz T, Dan A, Shwom R: Support for climate change policy: social psychological and social structural influences. Rur Soc 2007,72(2):185–214. CrossRef
- Berrens RP, Bohara AK, Jenkins-Smith HC, Silva CL, Brookshire DS: Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: application to global climate change using national internet samples. J Envir Econ & Mgmt 2004,47(2):331–363. CrossRef
- Petrolia DR, Bhattacharjee S, Hudson D, Herndon CW: Do Americans want ethanol? A comparative contingent-valuation study of willingness to pay for E-10 and E-85. Energy Econ 2010,32(1):121–128. CrossRef
- Solomon B, Johnson N: Valuing climate protection through willingness to pay for biomass ethanol. Ecol Econ, Method Advancements in the Footprint Anal 2009,68(7):2137–2144.
- Aguilar F, Thompson W: Charging into the blend wall: conjoint analysis of consumer willingness to pay for ethanol blend fuels. Selected Paper 2010 Annual Meeting of the Ag. & Appl. Econ. Assoc. Denver, Colorado; 2010.
- Jensen K, Clark C, English B, Menard J, Skahan D, Marra A: Willingness to pay for E85 from corn, switchgrass, and wood residues. Energy Econ 2010,32(6):1253–1262. CrossRef
- McFadden D: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers of econometrics. Edited by: Zarembka P. Academic, New York; 1973.
- Train K: Halton sequences for mixed logit. Manuscript, Department of Economics. University of Berkeley; 1999.
- Revelt D, Train K: Mixed logit with repeated choices: households'’ choices of appliance efficiency level. Rev Econ Stat 1998,80(4):647–657. CrossRef
- Reichl J, Frühwirth-Schnatter S: A censored random coefficients model for the detection of zero willingness to pay. Quant Mark Econ 2012,10(2):259–281. CrossRef
- Daly A, Hess S, Train K: Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models. Transportation 2012,39(1):19–31. CrossRef
- Hanley N, Mourato S, Wright RE: Choice modeling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation? J Econ Surv 2001,15(3):435–462.
- Lavin F, Hanemann W: Taste indicators and heterogeneous revealed preferences for congestion in recreation demand. UCB CUDARE Working Papers Number 1075, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics. University of California, Berkeley; 2008.
- Hensher D, Greene W: The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transport 2003,30(2):133–176. CrossRef
- Networks K: Ethanol conjoint survey field report. Conducted for the University of Tennessee, Knowledge Networks, Menlo Park, California; 2009.
- Sawtooth Software: On interaction effects and CBC designs. Sawtooth Solutions, Sequim, WA 1998. http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/education/ss/ss8.shtml. Accessed 23 Sept 2010
- Orme B: Fine-tuning CBC and adaptive CBC questionnaires. In Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series. Sawtooth Solutions, Sequim; 2009.
- Ward J: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Amer Stat Assoc 1963,58(301):236–244. CrossRef
- Duda RO, Hart PE: Pattern classification and scene analysis. Wiley, New York; 1973.
- Pena J, Lozano J, Larranaga P: An empirical comparison of four initializing methods for the k-means algorithm. Pattern Recog Lett 1999, 20:1027–1040. CrossRef
- Steinley D: Local optima in k-means clustering: what you don't know may hurt you. Psychol Meth 2003,8(3):294–304. CrossRef
- Milligan GW, Cooper MC: An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychomet 1980,45(3):325–342. CrossRef
- Waller N, Kaiser H, Illian J, Manry M: A comparison of the classification capabilities of the one-dimensional kohonen neural network with two partitioning and three hierarchical clustering algorithms. Psychomet 1998,63(1):5–22. CrossRef
- Kennedy P: A guide to econometrics. 4th edition. The MIT Press, Cambridge; 1998.
- Green P, Srinivasan V: Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. J Cons Res 1978,5(2):103–123. CrossRef
- Johnson R: Including holdout choice tasks in conjoint studies. In Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series. Sequim; 1997.
- Berger IA, Corbin RM: Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors. J Public Pol Mkting 1992,11(2):79–88.
- Greenhouse gas emission reductions as a motivator of e85 purchases across market segments
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Energy, Sustainability and Society
- Online Date
- October 2012
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Market opinion clusters
- Willingness to pay
- Emission reductions
- Industry Sectors