Metabolic and microbial community dynamics during the hydrolytic and acidogenic fermentation in a leach-bed process
Biogas production from lignocellulosic feedstock not competing with food production can contribute to a sustainable bioenergy system. The hydrolysis is the rate-limiting step in the anaerobic digestion of solid substrates such as straw. Hence, a detailed understanding of the metabolic processes during the steps of hydrolysis and acidogenesis is required to improve process control strategies.
The fermentation products formed during the acidogenic fermentation of maize silage as a model substrate in a leach-bed process were determined by gas and liquid chromatography. The bacterial community dynamics was monitored by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. The community profiles were correlated with the process data using multivariate statistics.
The batch process comprised three metabolic phases characterized by different fermentation products. The bacterial community dynamics correlated with the production of the respective metabolites. In phase 1, lactic and acetic acid fermentations dominated. Accordingly, bacteria of the genera Lactobacillus and Acetobacter were detected. In phase 2, the metabolic pathways shifted to butyric acid fermentation, accompanied by the production of hydrogen and carbon dioxide and a dominance of the genus Clostridium. In phase 3, phylotypes affiliated with Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae prevailed, accompanied by the formation of caproic and acetic acids, and a high gas production rate.
A clostridial butyric type of fermentation was predominant in the acidogenic fermentation of maize silage, whereas propionic type fermentation was marginal. As the metabolite composition resulting from acidogenesis affects the subsequent methanogenic performance, process control should focus on hydrolysis/acidogenesis when solid substrates are digested.
- Amon T, Amon B, Kryvoruchko V, Zollitsch W, Mayer K, Gruber L: Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure—influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. Agr Ecosyst Environ 2007, 118:173–182. CrossRef
- McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE: The biochemistry of silage. 2nd edition. Chalcombe Publications, Marlow, England; 1991.
- Herrmann C, Heiermann M, Idler C: Effects of ensiling, silage additives and storage period on methane formation of biogas crops. Bioresource Technol 2011, 102:5153–5161. CrossRef
- Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS: Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002,66(3):506–577. CrossRef
- Demirel B, Scherer P: The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 2008, 7:173–190. CrossRef
- Narihiro T, Sekiguchi Y: Microbial communities in anaerobic digestion processes for waste and wastewater treatment: a microbiological update. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008, 18:273–278. CrossRef
- Weiland P: Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 85:849–860. CrossRef
- Cardinali-Rezende J, Debarry RB, Colturato LFDB, Carneiro EV, Chartone-Souza E, Nascimento AMA: Molecular identification and dynamics of microbial communities in reactor treating organic household waste. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009, 84:777–789. CrossRef
- Ziganshin AM, Schmidt T, Scholwin F, Il’inskaya ON, Harms H, Kleinsteuber S: Bacteria and archaea involved in anaerobic digestion of distillers grains with solubles. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 89:2039–2052. CrossRef
- Pavlostathis SG, Giraldo-Gomez E: Kinetics of anaerobic treatment: a critical review. Crit Rev Environ Contr 1991,21(5,6):411–490. CrossRef
- Noike T, Endo G, Chang J, Yaguchi J, Matsumoto J: Characteristics of carbohydrate degradation and the rate-limiting step in anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol Bioeng 1995, 27:1482–1489. CrossRef
- Mata-Alvarez J, Macé S, Llabrés P: Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresource Technol 2000, 74:3–16.
- Song H, Clarke WP, Blackall LL: Concurrent microscopic observations and activity measurements of cellulose hydrolyzing and methanogenic populations during the batch anaerobic digestion of crystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 2005,91(3):369–378. CrossRef
- De la Torre I, Goma G: Characterization of anaerobic microbial culture with high acidogenic activity. Biotechnol Bioeng 1981, 23:185–199. CrossRef
- Breure AM, van Andel JG: Hydrolysis and acidogenic fermentation of a protein, gelatin, in an anaerobic continuous culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1984, 20:40–45. CrossRef
- Dinopoulou G, Rudd T, Lester JN: Anaerobic acidogenesis of a complex wastewater: 1. The influence of operational parameters on reactor performance. Biotechnol Bioeng 1988, 31:958–968.
- Marchaim U, Krause C: Propionic to acetic acid ratios in overloaded anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technol 1993, 43:195–203. CrossRef
- Wang L, Zhou Q, Li FT: Avoiding propionic acid accumulation in the anaerobic process for biohydrogen production. Biomass Bioenerg 2006, 30:177–182. CrossRef
- Ma J, Carballa M, Van de Caveyea P, Verstraete W: Enhanced propionic acid degradation (EPAD) system: proof of principle and feasibility. Water Res 2009, 43:3239–3248. CrossRef
- Lebuhn M, Liu F, Heuwinkel H, Gronauer A: Biogas production from mono-digestion of maize silage – long-term process stability and requirements. Water Sci Technol 2008,58(8):1645–1651. CrossRef
- Hanaki K, Hirunmasuwan S, Matsuoo T: Selective use of microorganisms in anaerobic treatment processes by application of immobilization. Water Res 1994,28(4):993–996. CrossRef
- Harper SR, Pohland FG: Recent developments in hydrogen management during anaerobic biological wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 1986, 28:585–602. CrossRef
- Mosey FE, Fernades XA: Patterns of hydrogen in biogas from the anaerobic digestion of milk-sugars. Water Sci Technol 1989, 21:187–196.
- Mosey FE: Mathematical modelling of the anaerobic digestion process: Regulatory mechanisms for the formation of short-chain volatile acids from glucose. Water Sci Technol 1983, 15:209–232.
- Inanc B, Matsui S, Ide S: Propionic acid accumulation and controlling factors in anaerobic treatment of carbohydrate: effects of H2 and pH. Water Sci Technol 1996,34(5–6):317–325.
- Ren N, Wang B, Huang J-C: Ethanol-type fermentation from carbohydrate in high rate acidogenic reactor. Biotech Bioeng 1997,54(5):428–433. CrossRef
- Naumann C, Bassler R: VDLUFA Methodenbuch: Die Chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. Band III, VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt; 2006.
- Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA: Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991, 74:3583–3597. CrossRef
- Lane DJ: 16 S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Edited by: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester; 1991:177–203.
- Basic Local Alignment Search Tool 2009. The BLASTN tool.. Accessed April 24, 2012
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990, 215:403–410.
- Michigan State University: The RDP Classifier. 2011. http://rdp.cme.msu.edu. Accessed April 24, 2012
- Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR: Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007, 73:5261–5267. CrossRef
- R Development Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; p ISBN 3–900051–07–0.http://www.R-project.org. Accessed April 20, 2012 p ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Accessed April 20, 2012
- Abdo Z, Schuette UM, Bent SJ, Williams CJ, Forney LJ, Joyce P: Statistical methods for characterizing diversity of microbial communities by analysis of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of 16 S rRNA genes. Environ Microbiol 2006, 8:929–938. CrossRef
- New England BioLabs, Inc: The NEB cutter. 2011. http://tools.neb.com/NEBcutter2. Accessed April 25, 2012
- Oksanen J: Multivariate analysis of ecological communities in R: vegan tutorial. 2011. http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/opetus/metodi/vegantutor.pdf Accessed April 20, 2012
- Zoetemeyer RJ, van den Heuvel JC, Cohen A: pH influence on acidogenic dissimilation of glucose in an anaerobic digestor. Water Res 1982, 16:303–311. CrossRef
- Zielonka S, Lemmer A, Oechsner H, Jungbluth T: Energy balance of a two-phase anaerobic digestion process for energy crops. Eng Life Sci 2010,10(6):515–519. CrossRef
- Stiles ME, Holzapfel WH: Lactic acid bacteria of foods and their current taxonomy. Int J Food Microbiol 1997, 36:1–29. CrossRef
- Zverlov VV, Hiegl W, Köck DE, Kellermann J, Köllmeier T, Schwarz WH: Hydrolytic bacteria in mesophilic and thermophilic degradation of plant biomass. Eng Life Sci 2010,10(6):528–536. CrossRef
- Kim MD, Song M, Jo M, Shin SG, Khim JH, Hwang S: Growth condition and bacterial community for maximum hydrolysis of suspended organic materials in anaerobic digestion of food waste-recycling wastewater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 85:1611–1618. CrossRef
- Das D, Veziroglu TN: Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2001, 26:13–28. CrossRef
- Morrison M, Miron J: Adhesion to cellulose by Ruminococcus albus: a combination of cellulosomes and Pil-proteins? FEMS Microbiol Lett 2000, 185:109–115.
- Ntaikou I, Gavala HN, Kornaros M, Lyberatos G: Hydrogen production from sugars and sweet sorghum biomass using Ruminococcus albus. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008,33(4):1153–1163.
- Cotta M, Forster R: The family Lachnospiraceae, including the genera Butyrivibrio, Lachnospira and Roseburia. In The prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria: Bacteria: Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria. 3rd edition. Edited by: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E. Springer, New York; 2006.
- Ding SY, Himmel ME: The maize primary cell wall microfibril: a new model derived from direct visualization. J Agr Food Chem 2006,54(3):597–606. CrossRef
- Cohen A, van Gemert JM, Zoetemeyer RJ, Breure AM: Main characteristics and stoichiometric aspects of acidogenesis of soluble carbohydrate containing wastewaters. Process Biochem 1984,19(6):228–232.
- Parawira W, Murto M, Read JS, Mattiasson B: Volatile fatty acid production during anaerobic mesophilic digestion of solid potato waste. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2004, 79:673–677. CrossRef
- Akao S, Tsuno H, Horie T, Mori S: Effects of pH and temperature on products and bacterial community in L-lactate batch fermentation of garbage under unsterile condition. Water Res 2007, 41:2636–2642. CrossRef
- Joergensen MH: Anaerobic formation of volatile acids in a chemostat. European J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1978, 6:181–187. CrossRef
- Kisaalita WS, Pinder KL: Acidogenic fermentation of lactose. Biotechnol Bioeng 1987, 30:88–95. CrossRef
- Horiuchi J-I, Shimizu T, Tada K, Kanno T, Kobayashi M: Selective production of organic acids in anaerobic acid reactor by pH control. Bioresource Technol 2002, 82:209–213. CrossRef
- Veeken A, Kalyuzhnyi S, Scharff H, Hamelers B: Effect of pH and VFA on hydrolysis of organic solid waste. J Environ Eng-ASCE 2000,126(12):1076–1081. CrossRef
- Demirel B, Yenigün O: Two-phase anaerobic digestion processes: a review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2002, 77:743–755. CrossRef
- Lv W, Schanbacher FL, Yu Z: Putting microbes to work in sequence: recent advances in temperature-phased anaerobic digestion processes. Bioresource Technol 2010, 101:9409–9414. CrossRef
- Hofvendahl K, Hahn-Hägerdal B: Factors affecting the fermentative lactic acid production from renewable resources. Enzyme Microb Tech 2000, 26:87–107. CrossRef
- Cohen A, Breure AM, van Andel JG, van Deursen A: Influence of phase separation on the anaerobic digestion of glucose – II: stability, and kinetic responses to shock loadings. Water Res 1982, 16:449–455. CrossRef
- Wiegant WM, Hennink M, Lettinga G: Separation of the propionate degradation to improve the efficiency of thermophilic anaerobic treatment of acidified wastewaters. Water Res 1986,20(4):517–524. CrossRef
- Metabolic and microbial community dynamics during the hydrolytic and acidogenic fermentation in a leach-bed process
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Energy, Sustainability and Society
- Online Date
- July 2012
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Anaerobic digestion
- Maize silage
- Solid state fermentation
- Bacterial 16 S rRNA genes
- T-RFLP fingerprinting
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Bioenergy, UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, in cooperation with the Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum, Torgauer Strasse 116, 04347, Leipzig, Germany
- 2. Department of Environmental Microbiology, UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany