Assessment of tumour size in PET/CT lung cancer studies: PET- and CT-based methods compared to pathology
Positron emission tomography (PET) may be useful for defining the gross tumour volume for radiation treatment planning and for response monitoring of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The purpose of this study was to compare tumour sizes obtained from CT- and various more commonly available PET-based tumour delineation methods to pathology findings.
Retrospective non-respiratory gated whole body [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT studies from 19 NSCLC patients were used. Several (semi-)automatic PET-based tumour delineation methods and manual CT-based delineation were used to assess the maximum tumour diameter.
50%, adaptive 41% threshold-based and contrast-oriented delineation methods showed good agreement with pathology after removing two outliers (R2=0.82). An absolute SUV threshold of 2.5 also showed a good agreement with pathology after the removal of 5 outliers (R2: 0.79), but showed a significant overestimation in the maximum diameter (19.8 mm, p<0.05). Adaptive 50%, relative threshold level and gradient-based methods did not show any outliers, provided only small, non-significant differences in maximum tumour diameter (<4.7 mm, p>0.10), and showed fair correlation (R2>0.62) with pathology. Although adaptive 70% threshold-based methods showed underestimation compared to pathology (36%), it provided the best precision (SD: 14%) together with good correlation (R2=0.81). Good correlation between CT delineation and pathology was observed (R2=0.77). However, CT delineation showed a significant overestimation compared with pathology (3.8 mm, p<0.05).
PET-based tumour delineation methods provided tumour sizes in agreement with pathology and may therefore be useful to define the (metabolically most) active part of the tumour for radiotherapy and response monitoring purposes.
- Erdi, YE (2007) The use of PET for radiotherapy. Current Medical Imaging Reviews 3: pp. 3-16
- Fletcher, JW, Djulbegovic, B, Soares, HP, Siegel, BA, Lowe, VJ, Lyman, GH, Coleman, RE, Wahl, R, Paschold, JC, Avril, N (2008) Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med 49: pp. 480-508 CrossRef
- Wahl, RL, Jacene, H, Kasamon, Y, Lodge, MA (2009) From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 50: pp. 122S-150S CrossRef
- van Baardwijk, A, Bosmans, G, Boersma, L, Buijsen, J, Wanders, S, Hochstenbag, M, van Suylen, RJ, Dekker, A, hing-Oberije, C, Houben, R (2007) PET-CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68: pp. 771-778 CrossRef
- Petit, SF, van Elmpt, WJ, Oberije, CJ, Vegt, E, Dingemans, AM, Lambin, P, Dekker, AL, De, RD (2010) [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake Patterns in Lung Before Radiotherapy Identify Areas More Susceptible to Radiation-Induced Lung Toxicity in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
- Hatt, M, Visvikis, D, Albarghach, NM, Tixier, F, Pradier, O, Cheze-Le, RC (2011) Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET image-based parameters in oesophageal cancer and impact of tumour delineation methodology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38: pp. 1191-1202 CrossRef
- van Dalen, JA, Hoffmann, AL, Dicken, V, Vogel, WV, Wiering, B, Ruers, TJ, Karssemeijer, N, Oyen, WJ (2007) A novel iterative method for lesion delineation and volumetric quantification with FDG PET. Nucl Med Commun 28: pp. 485-493 CrossRef
- Geets, X, Lee, JA, Bol, A, Lonneux, M, Gregoire, V (2007) A gradient-based method for segmenting FDG-PET images: methodology and validation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34: pp. 1427-1438 CrossRef
- Schaefer, A, Kremp, S, Hellwig, D, Rube, C, Kirsch, CM, Nestle, U (2008) A contrast-oriented algorithm for FDG-PET-based delineation of tumour volumes for the radiotherapy of lung cancer: derivation from phantom measurements and validation in patient data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35: pp. 1989-1999 CrossRef
- Cheebsumon, P, Yaqub, M, van Velden, FH, Hoekstra, OS, Lammertsma, AA, Boellaard, R (2011) Impact of [(18)F]FDG PET imaging parameters on automatic tumour delineation: need for improved tumour delineation methodology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38: pp. 2136-2144 CrossRef
- Cheebsumon, P, van Velden, FH, Yaqub, M, Frings, V, de Langen, AJ, Hoekstra, OS, Lammertsma, AA, Boellaard, R (2011) Effects of image characteristics on performance of tumor delineation methods: a test-retest assessment. J Nucl Med 52: pp. 1550-1558 CrossRef
- Cheebsumon, P, van Velden, FH, Yaqub, M, Hoekstra, CJ, Velasquez, LM, Hayes, W, Hoekstra, OS, Lammertsma, AA, Boellaard, R (2011) Measurement of metabolic tumor volume: static versus dynamic FDG scans. EJNMMI Res 1: pp. 35 CrossRef
- Hatt, M, le Cheze, RC, Descourt, P, Dekker, A, De, RD, Oellers, M, Lambin, P, Pradier, O, Visvikis, D (2010) Accurate automatic delineation of heterogeneous functional volumes in positron emission tomography for oncology applications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77: pp. 301-308 CrossRef
- Wanet, M, Lee, JA, Weynand, B, De, BM, Poncelet, A, Lacroix, V, Coche, E, Gregoire, V, Geets, X (2011) Gradient-based delineation of the primary GTV on FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison with threshold-based approaches, CT and surgical specimens. Radiother Oncol 98: pp. 117-125 CrossRef
- Yu, J, Li, X, Xing, L, Mu, D, Fu, Z, Sun, X, Sun, X, Yang, G, Zhang, B, Sun, X (2009) Comparison of tumor volumes as determined by pathologic examination and FDG-PET/CT images of non-small-cell lung cancer: a pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75: pp. 1468-1474 CrossRef
- Wu, K, Ung, YC, Hornby, J, Freeman, M, Hwang, D, Tsao, MS, Dahele, M, Darling, G, Maziak, DE, Tirona, R (2010) PET CT thresholds for radiotherapy target definition in non-small-cell lung cancer: how close are we to the pathologic findings?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77: pp. 699-706 CrossRef
- Hatt, M, Cheze-Le, RC, van Baardwijk, A, Lambin, P, Pradier, O, Visvikis, D (2011) Impact of tumor size and tracer uptake heterogeneity in (18)F-FDG PET and CT non-small cell lung cancer tumor delineation. J Nucl Med 52: pp. 1690-1697 CrossRef
- Boellaard, R, Krak, NC, Hoekstra, OS, Lammertsma, AA (2004) Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. J Nucl Med 45: pp. 1519-1527
- Paulino, AC, Koshy, M, Howell, R, Schuster, D, Davis, LW (2005) Comparison of CT- and FDG-PET-defined gross tumor volume in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61: pp. 1385-1392 CrossRef
- Steenbakkers, RJ, Duppen, JC, Fitton, I, Deurloo, KE, Zijp, L, Uitterhoeve, AL, Rodrigus, PT, Kramer, GW, Bussink, J, De, Jaeger K (2005) Observer variation in target volume delineation of lung cancer related to radiation oncologist-computer interaction: a 'Big Brother' evaluation. Radiother Oncol 77: pp. 182-190 CrossRef
- Siedschlag, C, van Loon, J, van Baardwijk, A, Rossi, MM, van Pel, R, Blaauwgeers, JL, van Suylen, RJ, Boersma, L, Stroom, J, Gilhuijs, KG (2009) Analysis of the relative deformation of lung lobes before and after surgery in patients with NSCLC. Phys Med Biol 54: pp. 5483-5492 CrossRef
- Assessment of tumour size in PET/CT lung cancer studies: PET- and CT-based methods compared to pathology
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
- Online Date
- October 2012
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Tumour delineation
- Tumour diameter
- FDG PET
- Non-small cell lung cancer
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam, 1007MB, The Netherlands
- 2. Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands