Identifying clinical course patterns in SMS data using cluster analysis
Recently, there has been interest in using the short message service (SMS or text messaging), to gather frequent information on the clinical course of individual patients. One possible role for identifying clinical course patterns is to assist in exploring clinically important subgroups in the outcomes of research studies. Two previous studies have investigated detailed clinical course patterns in SMS data obtained from people seeking care for low back pain. One used a visual analysis approach and the other performed a cluster analysis of SMS data that had first been transformed by spline analysis. However, cluster analysis of SMS data in its original untransformed form may be simpler and offer other advantages. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether cluster analysis could be used for identifying clinical course patterns distinct from the pattern of the whole group, by including all SMS time points in their original form. It was a ‘proof of concept’ study to explore the potential, clinical relevance, strengths and weakness of such an approach.
This was a secondary analysis of longitudinal SMS data collected in two randomised controlled trials conducted simultaneously from a single clinical population (n = 322). Fortnightly SMS data collected over a year on ‘days of problematic low back pain’ and on ‘days of sick leave’ were analysed using Two-Step (probabilistic) Cluster Analysis.
Clinical course patterns were identified that were clinically interpretable and different from those of the whole group. Similar patterns were obtained when the number of SMS time points was reduced to monthly. The advantages and disadvantages of this method were contrasted to that of first transforming SMS data by spline analysis.
This study showed that clinical course patterns can be identified by cluster analysis using all SMS time points as cluster variables. This method is simple, intuitive and does not require a high level of statistical skill. However, there are alternative ways of managing SMS data and many different methods of cluster analysis. More research is needed, especially head-to-head studies, to identify which technique is best to use under what circumstances.
- Johansen B, Wedderkopp N: Comparison between data obtained through real-time data capture by SMS and a retrospective telephone interview. Chiropractic and Manual Therapies 2010, 18:10.
- Lemeunier N, Kongsted A, Axen I: Prevalence of pain-free weeks in chiropractic subjects with low back pain - a longitudinal study using data gathered with text messages. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 2011, 19:28. CrossRef
- Stanton TR, Latimer J, Maher CG, Hancock M: Definitions of recurrence of an episode of low back pain: A systematic review. Spine 2009, 34:E316-E322. CrossRef
- Marras WS, Ferguson SA, Burr D, Schabo P, Maronitis A: Low back pain recurrence in occupational environments. Spine 2007, 32:2387–2397. CrossRef
- Foster NE, Hill JC, Hay EM: Subgrouping patients with low back pain in primary care: Are we getting any better at it? Man Ther 2011, 16:3–8. CrossRef
- Hancock M, Herbert R, Maher CG: A guide to interpretation of studies investigating subgroups of responders to physical therapy interventions. Phys Ther 2009, 89:698–704. CrossRef
- Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main CJ, Foster NE, Hay EM: A primary care back pain screening tool: Identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis & Rheumatism (Arthritis Care & Research) 2008, 59:632–641. CrossRef
- Dunn KM, Jordan KP, Mancl L, Drangsholt MT, Resche LL: Trajectories of pain in adolescents: A prospective cohort study. Pain 2011, 152:66–73. CrossRef
- Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, Irrgang JJ, Johnson KK, Majkowski GR, Delitto A: A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141:920–928.
- Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, Onstantinou K, Main CJ, Mason E, Somerville S, et al.: Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011,378(9802):1560–1571. 9 CrossRef
- Axén I, Bodin L, Bergström G, Halasz L, Lange F, Lövgren PW, Rosenbaum A, Leboeuf-Yde C, Jensen I: Clustering patients on the basis of their individual course of low back pain over a six month period. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011, 12:99. CrossRef
- Chen C, Hogg-Johnson S, Smith P: The recovery patterns of back pain among workers with compensated occupational back injuries. Occup Environ Med 2007, 64:534–540. CrossRef
- Kongsted A, Leboeuf-Yde C: The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: course patterns established through weekly follow-ups in patients treated for low back pain. Chiropractic and Manual Therapies 2010, 18:2.
- Tamcan O, Mannion AF, Eisenring C, Horisberger B, Elfering A, Müller U: The course of chronic and recurrent low back pain in the general population. Pain 2010, 150:451–457. CrossRef
- Dunn KM, Jordan K, Croft PR: Characterizing the Course of Low Back Pain: A Latent Class Analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2006, 163:754–761. CrossRef
- Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC: Cluster analysis. In Multivariate data analysis. 4th edition. Edited by: Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA; 1995.
- SPSS: SPSS Statistics Base 17.0 User’s Guide. In Book SPSS Statistics Base 17.0 User’s Guide. SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL; 2007.
- Jensen RK, Leboeuf-Yde C, Wedderkopp N, Sorensen JS, Manniche C: Rest versus exercise as treatment for patients with low back pain and Modic changes. A randomised controlled clinical trial. BMC Med 2012, 10:22. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-22. CrossRef
- Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR: The risk of determining risk with multivariate models. Ann Intern Med 1993, 118:201–210.
- Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR: A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996, 49:1373–1379. CrossRef
- Sambandam R: Cluster analysis gets complicated. Marketing Research 2003, 15:16–21.
- Mooi E, Sarstedt M: A concise guide to market research. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. CrossRef
- Wallace CS: Statistical and inductive inference by minimum message length. Springer, New York, USA; 2005.
- Mandic D, Chambers J: Recurrent neural networks for prediction: Architectures, learning algorithms and stability. Wiley, West Sussex, UK; 2001. CrossRef
- Kurt I, Ture M, Kurum AT: Comparing performances of logistic regression, classification and regression tree, and neural networks for predicting coronary artery disease. Expert Systems with Applications 2008, 34:366–374. CrossRef
- Eftekhar B, Mohammad K, Ardebili HE, Ghodsi M, Ketabchi E: Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression models for prediction of mortality in head trauma based on initial clinical data. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005, 5:3. doi:101186/1472-6947-5-3 2005, 5:3. CrossRef
- Identifying clinical course patterns in SMS data using cluster analysis
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
- Online Date
- July 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Outcomes assessment
- Back pain
- Cluster analysis
- Text messaging
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Research Department, The Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Lillibaelt Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Services Research, Member of the Clinical Locomotion Network, University of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
- 2. Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Member of the Clinical Locomotion Network, Odense, Denmark