Development of an embryonic skeletogenic mesenchyme lineage in a sea cucumber reveals the trajectory of change for the evolution of novel structures in echinoderms
The mechanisms by which the conserved genetic “toolkit” for development generates phenotypic disparity across metazoans is poorly understood. Echinoderm larvae provide a great resource for understanding how developmental novelty arises. The sea urchin pluteus larva is dramatically different from basal echinoderm larval types, which include the auricularia-type larva of its sister taxon, the sea cucumbers, and the sea star bipinnaria larva. In particular, the pluteus has a mesodermally-derived larval skeleton that is not present in sea star larvae or any outgroup taxa. To understand the evolutionary origin of this structure, we examined the molecular development of mesoderm in the sea cucumber, Parastichopus parvimensis.
By comparing gene expression in sea urchins, sea cucumbers and sea stars, we partially reconstructed the mesodermal regulatory state of the echinoderm ancestor. Surprisingly, we also identified expression of the transcription factor alx1 in a cryptic skeletogenic mesenchyme lineage in P. parvimensis. Orthologs of alx1 are expressed exclusively within the sea urchin skeletogenic mesenchyme, but are not expressed in the mesenchyme of the sea star, which suggests that alx1 + mesenchyme is a synapomorphy of at least sea urchins and sea cucumbers. Perturbation of Alx1 demonstrates that this protein is necessary for the formation of the sea cucumber spicule. Overexpression of the sea star alx1 ortholog in sea urchins is sufficient to induce additional skeleton, indicating that the Alx1 protein has not evolved a new function during the evolution of the larval skeleton.
The proposed echinoderm ancestral mesoderm state is highly conserved between the morphologically similar, but evolutionarily distant, auricularia and bipinnaria larvae. However, the auricularia, but not bipinnaria, also develops a simple skelotogenic cell lineage. Our data indicate that the first step in acquiring these novel cell fates was to re-specify the ancestral mesoderm into molecularly distinct territories. These new territories likely consisted of only a few cells with few regulatory differences from the ancestral state, thereby leaving the remaining mesoderm to retain its original function. The new territories were then free to take on a new fate. Partitioning of existing gene networks was a necessary pre-requisite to establish novelty in this system.
- Carroll SB, Grenier JK, Weatherbee SD: From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design. 2nd edition. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing Group; 2005.
- True JR, Carroll SB: Gene co-option in physiological and morphological evolution. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2002, 18:53–80. CrossRef
- Simonnet F, Moczek AP: Conservation and diversification of gene function during mouthpart development in Onthophagus beetles. Evol Dev 2011, 13:280–289. CrossRef
- Fraser GJ, Hulsey CD, Bloomquist RF, Uyesugi K, Manley NR, Streelman JT: An ancient gene network is co-opted for teeth on old and new jaws. PLoS Biol 2009, 7:e1000031. CrossRef
- Bowsher J, Nijhout H: Partial co-option of the appendage patterning pathway in the development of abdominal appendages in the sepsid fly Themira biloba . Dev Genes Evol 2009, 219:577–587. CrossRef
- Janssen R, Eriksson BJ, Budd GE, Akam M, Prpic N-M: Gene expression patterns in an onychophoran reveal that regionalization predates limb segmentation in pan-arthropods. Evol Dev 2010, 12:363–372. CrossRef
- Saenko S, Brakefield P, Beldade P: Single locus affects embryonic segment polarity and multiple aspects of an adult evolutionary novelty. BMC Biol 2011, 8:111. CrossRef
- Lemons D, Fritzenwanker JH, Gerhart J, Lowe CJ, McGinnis W: Co-option of an anteroposterior head axis patterning system for proximodistal patterning of appendages in early bilaterian evolution. Dev Biol 2010, 344:358–362. CrossRef
- Gao F, Davidson EH: Transfer of a large gene regulatory apparatus to a new developmental address in echinoid evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:6091–6096. CrossRef
- Hyman LH: The Invertebrates: Echinodermata. Volume IV. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1955.
- Wada H, Satoh N: Phylogenetic relationships among extant classes of echinoderms, as inferred from sequences of 18 S rDNA, coincide with relationships deduced from the fossil record. J Mol Evol 1994, 38:41–49. CrossRef
- Nakano H, Hibino T, Oji T, Hara Y, Amemiya S: Larval stages of a living sea lily (stalked crinoid echinoderm). Nature 2003, 421:158–160. CrossRef
- Nielsen MG, Popodi E, Minsuk S, Raff RA: Evolutionary convergence in Otx expression in the pentameral adult rudiment in direct-developing sea urchins. Dev Genes Evol 2003, 213:73–82.
- Pisani D, Feuda R, Peterson KJ, Smith AB: Resolving phylogenetic signal from noise when divergence is rapid: a new look at the old problem of echinoderm class relationships. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2012, 62:27–34. CrossRef
- Janies DA, Voight JR, Daly M: Echinoderm phylogeny including xyloplax, a progenetic asteroid. Syst Biol 2011, 60:420–438. CrossRef
- Wray GA: The evolution of cell lineage in echinoderms. Am Zool 1994, 34:353–363.
- Tanaka S, Dan K: Study of the lineage and cell cycle of small micromeres in embryos of the sea urchin, Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus . Dev Growth Differ 1990, 32:145–156. CrossRef
- Ruffins SW, Ettensohn CA: A fate map of the vegetal plate of the sea urchin ( Lytechinus variegtus ) mesenchyme blastula. Development 1996, 122:253–263.
- Oliveri P, Tu Q, Davidson EH: Global regulatory logic for specification of an embryonic cell lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:5955–5962. CrossRef
- Croce J, Lhomond G, Lozano J-C, Gache C: ske-T, a T-box gene expressed in the skeletogenic mesenchyme lineage of the sea urchin embryo. MechDev 2001, 107:159–162.
- Ettensohn CA, Illies MR, Oliveri P, De Jong DL: Alx1, a member of the Cart1/Alx3/Alx4 subfamily of Paired-class homeodomain proteins, is an essential component of the gene network controlling skeletogenic fate specification in the sea urchin embryo. Development 2003, 130:2917–2928. CrossRef
- Howard-Ashby M, Materna SC, Brown CT, Chen L, Cameron RA, Davidson EH: Identification and characterization of homeobox transcription factor genes in Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, and their expression in embryonic development. Dev Biol 2006, 300:74–89. CrossRef
- Kurokawa D, Kitajima T, Mitsunaga-Nakatsubo K, Amemiya S, Shimada H, Akasaka K: HpEts, an ets-related transcription factor implicated in primary mesenchyme cell differentiation in the sea urchin embryo. Mech Dev 1999, 80:41–52. CrossRef
- Rho HK, McClay DR: The control of foxN2/3 expression in sea urchin embryos and its function in the skeletogenic gene regulatory network. Development 2011, 138:937–945. CrossRef
- Rizzo F, Fernandez-Serra M, Squarzoni P, Archimandritis A, Arnone MI: Identification and developmental expression of the ets gene family in the sea urchin ( Strongylocentrotus purpuratus ). Dev Biol 2006, 300:35–48. CrossRef
- Tu Q, Brown T, Davidson EH, Oliveri P: Sea urchin Forkhead gene family: Phylogeny and embryonic expression. Dev Biol 2006, 300:49–62. CrossRef
- Zhu X, Mahairas G, Illies M, Cameron RA, Davidson EH, Ettensohn CA: A large-scale analysis of mRNAs expressed by primary mesenchyme cells of the sea urchin embryo. Development 2001, 128:2615–2627.
- Ransick A, Davidson EH: cis-regulatory processing of Notch signaling input to the sea urchin glial cells missing gene during mesoderm specification. Dev Biol 2006, 297:587–602. CrossRef
- Lee PY, Davidson EH: Expression of Spgatae, the Strongylocentrotus purpuratus ortholog of vertebrate GATA4/5/6 factors. Gene Expr Patterns 2004, 5:161–165. CrossRef
- Duboc V, Lapraz F, Saudemont A, Bessodes N, Mekpoh F, Haillot E, Quirin M, Lepage T: Nodal and BMP2/4 pattern the mesoderm and endoderm during development of the sea urchin embryo. Development 2010, 137:223–235. CrossRef
- Cameron RA, Fraser SE, Britten RJ, Davidson EH: Macromere cell fates during sea urchin development. Development 1991, 113:1085–1091.
- Hinman VF, Davidson EH: Evolutionary plasticity of developmental gene regulatory network architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:19404–19409. CrossRef
- Hinman VF, Nguyen AT, Cameron RA, Davidson EH: Developmental gene regulatory network architecture across 500 million years of echinoderm evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:13356–13361. CrossRef
- McCauley BS, Weideman EP, Hinman VF: A conserved gene regulatory network subcircuit drives different developmental fates in the vegetal pole of highly divergent echinoderm embryos. Dev Biol 2010, 340:200–208. CrossRef
- Holland ND: Electron microscopy of the sea cucumber, Stichopus tremulous, from unfertilized egg through hatched blastula. Acta Zool 1981, 62:89–112. CrossRef
- Smiley S: Metamorphosis of Stichopus califronicus (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) and its phylogenetic implications. Biol Bull 1986, 171:611–631. CrossRef
- Shoguchi E, Harada Y, Numakunai T, Satoh N: Expression of the Otx gene in the ciliary bands during sea cucumber embryogenesis. Genesis 2000, 27:58. CrossRef
- Oliveri P, Walton KD, Davidson EH, McClay DR: Repression of mesodermal fate by foxa, a key endoderm regulator of the sea urchin embryo. Development 2006, 133:4173–4181. CrossRef
- Koga H, Matsubara M, Fujitani H, Miyamoto N, Komatsu M, Kiyomoto M, Akasaka K, Wada H: Functional evolution of Ets in echinoderms with focus on the evolution of echinoderm larval skeletons. Dev Genes Evol 2010, 220:107–115. CrossRef
- Hinman VF, Davidson EH: Expression of a gene encoding a Gata transcription factor during embryogenesis of the starfish Asterina miniata . Gene Expr Patterns 2003, 3:419–422. CrossRef
- Ettensohn CA, Kitazawa C, Cheers MS, Leonard JD, Sharma T: Gene regulatory networks and developmental plasticity in the early sea urchin embryo: alternative deployment of the skeletogenic gene regulatory network. Development 2007, 134:3077–3087. CrossRef
- Kato S, Tsurumaru S, Taga M, Yamane T, Shibata Y, Kaoru O, Fujiwara A, Yamano K, Yoshikuni M: Neuronal peptides induce oocyte maturation and spawning of a sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus . Dev Biol 2009, 326:169–176. CrossRef
- Hinman VF, Nguyen AT, Davidson EH: Expression and function of a starfish Otx ortholog, Am Otx: a conserved role for Otx proteins in endoderm development that predates divergence of the eleutherozoa. Mech Dev 2003, 120:1165–1176. CrossRef
- Cheers MS, Ettensohn CA: Rapid microinjection of fertilized eggs. Methods Cell Biol 2004, 74:287–310. CrossRef
- Yankura KA, Martik ML, Jennings CK, Hinman VF: Uncoupling of complex regulatory patterning during evolution of larval development in echinoderms. BMC Biol 2010, 8:143. CrossRef
- Altschul SF, Wootton JC, Gertz EM, Agarwala R, Morgulis A, Schaffer AA, Yu Y-K: Protein database searches using compositionally-adjusted substitution matrices. FEBS Journal 2005,272(20):5101–5109. CrossRef
- Anisimova M, Gascuel O: Approximate likelihood ratio test for branches: a fast, accurate and powerful alternative. Systematic Biology 2006,55(4):539–552. CrossRef
- Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Chevenet F, Dufayard JF, Guindon S, Lefort V, Lescot M, et al.: Phylogeny.fr: Robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Research 2008,36(suppl 2):W465-W469. CrossRef
- Guindon SP, Gascuel O: A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large Phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 2003,52(5):696–704. CrossRef
- Development of an embryonic skeletogenic mesenchyme lineage in a sea cucumber reveals the trajectory of change for the evolution of novel structures in echinoderms
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
- Online Date
- August 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Sea cucumber
- Evolution of novelty