Design preferences and cognitive styles: experimentation by automated website synthesis
This article aims to demonstrate computational synthesis of Web-based experiments in undertaking experimentation on relationships among the participants' design preference, rationale, and cognitive test performance. The exemplified experiments were computationally synthesised, including the websites as materials, experiment protocols as methods, and cognitive tests as protocol modules. This work also exemplifies the use of a website synthesiser as an essential instrument enabling the participants to explore different possible designs, which were generated on the fly, before selection of preferred designs.
The participants were given interactive tree and table generators so that they could explore some different ways of presenting causality information in tables and trees as the visualisation formats. The participants gave their preference ratings for the available designs, as well as their rationale (criteria) for their design decisions. The participants were also asked to take four cognitive tests, which focus on the aspects of visualisation and analogy-making. The relationships among preference ratings, rationale, and the results of cognitive tests were analysed by conservative non-parametric statistics including Wilcoxon test, Krustal-Wallis test, and Kendall correlation.
In the test, 41 of the total 64 participants preferred graphical (tree-form) to tabular presentation. Despite the popular preference for graphical presentation, the given tabular presentation was generally rated to be easier than graphical presentation to interpret, especially by those who were scored lower in the visualization and analogy-making tests.
This piece of evidence helps generate a hypothesis that design preferences are related to specific cognitive abilities. Without the use of computational synthesis, the experiment setup and scientific results would be impractical to obtain.
- Zhang, J (1997) The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science 21: pp. 179-217 CrossRef
- Zhang, J (1997) Distributed representations as a principle for the analysis of cockpit information displays. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 7: pp. 105-121 CrossRef
- Scaife, M, Rogers, Y (1996) External cognition: how do graphical representations work?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45: pp. 185-213 CrossRef
- Oestermeier, U, Hesse, F (2000) Verbal and visual causal arguments. Cognition 75: pp. 65-104 CrossRef
- Zhang, J (1996) A representational analysis of relational information displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45: pp. 59-74 CrossRef
- Kamps, T (1999) Diagram Design. CrossRef
- Mittal, V, Roth, S, Moore, J, Mattis, J, Carenini, G (1996) Generating explanatory captions for information graphics. Proceeedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Montreal, Canada
- Mackinlay, J (1996) Automatic Design of Graphical Presentation. Phd thesis. Computer Science Department, Stanford University
- Roth, S, Mattis, J (1990) Data characterization for graphic presentation. Proceedings of the onference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI).
- Casner, S (1991) A task-analytic approach to the automated design of graphic presentations. CM Transactions on Graphics 10: pp. 111-151 CrossRef
- Krug, S (2000) Don't Make Me Think: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability.
- Nielsen, J (2000) Designing Web Usability.
- Detienne, F (2002) Software Design - Cognitive Aspects. CrossRef
- Ekstrom, R, French, J, Harmon, H (1976) Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests.
- Evans, T (1987) A heuristic program to solve geometric-analogy problems. Readings in computer vision.
- R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Tech rep, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- Design preferences and cognitive styles: experimentation by automated website synthesis
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
- Online Date
- June 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, UK
- 2. State Key Lab QRCM and ICMS, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao, China
- 3. Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK