Implementing practice guidelines for anxiety disorders in secondary mental health care: a case study
Recent years have seen the large-scale development of clinical practice guidelines for mental disorders in several countries. In the Netherlands, more than ten multidisciplinary guidelines for mental health care have been developed since 2003. The first dealt with the treatment of anxiety disorders. An important question was whether it is feasible to implement these guidelines because implementing practice guidelines is often difficult. Although several implementation interventions have proven effective, there seems to be no ready-made strategy that works in all circumstances.
The Dutch multidisciplinary guidelines for anxiety disorders were implemented in a community mental health care centre, located in the east of the Netherlands. The centre provides secondary outpatient care. The unit within the centre that specializes in the treatment of anxiety disorders has 16 team members with diverse professional backgrounds. Important steps in the process of implementing the guidelines were analysing the care provided before start of the implementation to determine the goals for improvement, and analysing the context and target group for implementation. Based on these analyses, a tailor-made multifaceted implementation strategy was developed that combined the reorganization of the care process, the development of instruction materials, the organization of educational meetings and the use of continuous quality circles to improve adherence to guidelines.
Discussion and evaluation
Significant improvements in adherence rates were made in the aspect of care that was targeted for change. An increase was found in the number of patients being provided with recommended forms of psychotherapeutic treatment, ranging from 43% to 54% (p < 0.01). The delivery of adequate pharmacological treatment was not explicitly targeted for change remained constant.
The case study presented here shows that the implementation of practice guidelines for anxiety disorders in mental health care is feasible. Based on the results of our study, the implementation model used offers a useful approach to guideline implementation. By describing the exact steps that were followed in detail and providing some of the tools that were used in the study, we hope the replication of this implementation methodology is made more practical for others in the future.
- van Balkom AJLM, Oosterbaan DB: Do guidelines lead to better clinical practice? (in Dutch). Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 2008, 50:323–328.
- Mental health guidelines (in Dutch)http://www.ggzrichtlijnen.nl/
- Landelijke Stuurgroep Multidisciplinaire Richtlijnontwikkeling in de GGZ, Dutch multidisciplinary guideline for anxiety disorders (in Dutch). Utrecht: Trimbos Instituut; 2003.
- Mendlowics MV, Stein MB: Quality of life in individuals with anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2000,157(5):669–682. CrossRef
- Fernandez A, Haro JM, Martinez-Alonso M, Demyttenaere K, Brugha TS, Autonell J, de Girolamo G, Bernert S, Lepine JP, Alonso J: Treatment adequacy for anxiety and depressive disorders in six European countries. Brit J Psychiatry 2007, 190:172–173. CrossRef
- Wang PS, Lane M, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Wells KB, Kessler RC: Twelve-Month Use of Mental Health Services in the United States: Results From the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005, 62:629–640. CrossRef
- Young AS, Klap R, Sherbourne CD, et al.: The Quality of Care for Depressive and Anxiety Disorders in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001, 58:55–61. CrossRef
- Grol R: Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care 2001,39(Suppl 2):46–54.
- Sinnema H, Franx G, Van ‘t Land H: Multidisciplinary guidelines within mental health care: Insight into factors influencing their use and measures to promote their usage. Theme report as part of the Dutch trend report on mental health care, subdomain 3: Quality and effectiveness (in Dutch). Utrecht: Trimbosinstituut; 2009.
- Bauer MS: A Review of Quantitative Studies of Adherence to Mental Health Clinical Practice Guidelines. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2002, 10:138–153. CrossRef
- Weinmann S, Koesters M, Becker T: Effects of implementation of psychiatric guidelines on provider performance and patient outcome: a review. Acta Psych Scand 2007, 115:420–433. CrossRef
- Grol R, Grimshaw J: From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. The Lancet 2003, 362:1225–1230. CrossRef
- Grol R, Wensing M: Effective implementation: a model. In Improving patient care: The implementation of change in clinical practice. Edited by: Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. Edingburgh: Elsevier Butterworth-Heineman; 2005:41–57.
- van Dijk MK, Verbraak MJPM, Oosterbaan DB, ten Doeschate RJA, van Balkom AJLM: Asssess, compare and improve: processindicators for the care for patients with an anxiety disorder (in Dutch). Maandblad Geestelijke volksgezondheid 2007,62(10):849–861.
- van Dijk MK, Verbraak MJPM, Oosterbaan DB, van Balkom AJLM: Implementing guidelines: the identification of factors that impede or promote successful implementation by use of a questionnaire (in Dutch). Psychopraxis 2008, 10:202–208. CrossRef
- Ajzen I: The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum 1991,50(2):179–211. CrossRef
- Rebergen D, Hoenen J, Heinemans A, Bruinvels D, Bakker A, van Mechelen W: Adherence to mental health guidelines by Dutch occupational physicians. Occup Med 2006, 56:461–468. CrossRef
- van Dijk MK, Verbraak MJPM, Oosterbaan DB, ten Doeschate RJA, van Balkom AJLM: Implementing the Dutch multidisciplinary guideline on anxiety disorders: an example from clinical practice (in Dutch). Maandblad Geestelijke volksgezondheid 2009, 64:273–285.
- Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al.: The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998,59(Suppl. 20):22–33.
- van Vliet IM, Leroy H, van Megen HJGM: The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, Dutch Version 5.0.0. 2000. (in Dutch)
- Schulz R, Schulz C: Management practices, physician autonomy, and satisfaction: Evidence from mental health institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany. Med Care 1988, 26:750–763. CrossRef
- Implementing practice guidelines for anxiety disorders in secondary mental health care: a case study
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
- Online Date
- September 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Anxiety disorders
- Practice guidelines
- Implementation strategy
- Tools for implementation
- Author Affiliations
- 1. HSK Group, Oude Oeverstraat 120, 6811, JZ, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- 2. Behavioral Science Institute, Academic Centre for Social Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- 3. Department of Psychiatry, UMC St. Radboud, Overwaal Centre for Anxiety Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- 4. Department of Psychiatry and EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center and GGZinGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands