May 2012, 7:18,
Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Date: 11 May 2012
Effects of expertise on football betting
Football (soccer) is one of the most popular sports in the world, including Europe. It is associated with important betting activities. A common belief, widely spread among those who participate in gambling activities, is that knowledge and expertise on football lead to better prediction skills for match outcomes. If unfounded, however, this belief should be considered as a form of “illusion of control.” The aim of this study was to examine whether football experts are better than nonexperts at predicting football match scores.
Two hundred and fifty-eight persons took part in the study: 21.3% as football experts, 54.3% as laypersons (non-initiated to football), and 24.4% as football amateurs. They predicted the scores of the first 10 matches of the 2008 UEFA European Football Championship. Logistic regressions were carried out to assess the link between the accuracy of the forecasted scores and the expertise of the participants (expert, amateur, layperson), controlling for age and gender.
The variables assessed did not predict the accuracy of scoring prognosis (R2 ranged from 1% to 6%).
Expertise, age, and gender did not appear to have an impact on the accuracy of the football match prognoses. Therefore, the belief that football expertise improves betting skills is no more than a cognitive distortion called the “illusion of control.” Gamblers may benefit from psychological interventions that target the illusion of control related to their believed links between betting skills and football expertise. Public health policies may need to consider the phenomenon in order to prevent problem gambling related to football betting.
Maher A, Wilson N, Signal L, Thomson G: Patterns of sports sponsorship by gambling, alcohol and food companies: an Internet survey. BMC Publ Health 2006, 6:95.CrossRef
Langer E: The illusion of control. J Pers Soc Psychol 1975, 32:311–328.CrossRef
Boulier BL, Stekler HL: Are sports seedings good predictors?: an evaluation. International J Forecasting 1999, 15:83–91.CrossRef
Vergin RC, Sosik JJ: No place like home: an examination of the home field advantage in gambling strategies in NFL football. J Econ Bus 1999, 51:21–31.CrossRef
Forrest D, Simmons R: Outcome uncertainty and attendance demand in sport: the case of English soccer. J Royal Stat Soc: Series D, Statistician 2002,51(2):229–241.CrossRef
Ladouceur R, Giroux I, Jacques C: Winning on the horses: how much strategy and knowledge are needed? J Psychol 1998, 132:133–142.CrossRef
Sierra J, Hyman M: In search of value: a model of wagering intentions. J Marketing Theory Pract 2009, 17:235–249.CrossRef
- Effects of expertise on football betting
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
- Online Date
- May 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Sport betting
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Geneva University Hospitals, Grand-pré 70 C, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland
- 2. Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
- 3. Addiction Division, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada