Effects of expertise on football betting
Football (soccer) is one of the most popular sports in the world, including Europe. It is associated with important betting activities. A common belief, widely spread among those who participate in gambling activities, is that knowledge and expertise on football lead to better prediction skills for match outcomes. If unfounded, however, this belief should be considered as a form of “illusion of control.” The aim of this study was to examine whether football experts are better than nonexperts at predicting football match scores.
Two hundred and fifty-eight persons took part in the study: 21.3% as football experts, 54.3% as laypersons (non-initiated to football), and 24.4% as football amateurs. They predicted the scores of the first 10 matches of the 2008 UEFA European Football Championship. Logistic regressions were carried out to assess the link between the accuracy of the forecasted scores and the expertise of the participants (expert, amateur, layperson), controlling for age and gender.
The variables assessed did not predict the accuracy of scoring prognosis (R2 ranged from 1% to 6%).
Expertise, age, and gender did not appear to have an impact on the accuracy of the football match prognoses. Therefore, the belief that football expertise improves betting skills is no more than a cognitive distortion called the “illusion of control.” Gamblers may benefit from psychological interventions that target the illusion of control related to their believed links between betting skills and football expertise. Public health policies may need to consider the phenomenon in order to prevent problem gambling related to football betting.
- Maher, A, Wilson, N, Signal, L, Thomson, G (2006) Patterns of sports sponsorship by gambling, alcohol and food companies: an Internet survey. BMC Publ Health 6: pp. 95 CrossRef
- Peltzer, K, Mabilu, MG, Mathoho, SF, Nekhwevha, AP, Sikhwivhilu, T, Sinthumule, TS (2006) Trauma history and severity of gambling involvement among horse-race gamblers in a South African gambling setting. Psychol Rep 99: pp. 472-476 CrossRef
- Labrie, RA, Laplante, DA, Nelson, SE, Schumann, A, Shaffer, HJ (2007) Assessing the playing field: a prospective longitudinal study of Internet sports gambling behavior. J Gambl Stud 23: pp. 347-362 CrossRef
- Khazaal, Y, Chatton, A, Cochand, S, Jermann, F, Osiek, C, Bondolfi, G, Zullino, D (2008) Quality of web-based information on pathological gambling. J Gambl Stud 24: pp. 357-366 CrossRef
- Coquard, O, Fernandez, S, Zullino, D, Khazaal, Y (2011) A follow-up study on the quality of alcohol dependence-related information on the web. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 6: pp. 13 CrossRef
- Langer, E (1975) The illusion of control. J Pers Soc Psychol 32: pp. 311-328 CrossRef
- Toneatto, T, Blitz-Miller, T, Calderwood, K, Dragonetti, R, Tsanos, A (1997) Cognitive distortions in heavy gambling. J Gambl Stud 13: pp. 253-266 CrossRef
- Tavares, H, Martins, SS, Lobo, DS, Silveira, CM, Gentil, V, Hodgins, DC (2003) Factors at play in faster progression for female pathological gamblers: an exploratory analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 64: pp. 433-438 CrossRef
- Cantinotti, M, Ladouceur, R, Jacques, C (2004) Sports betting: can gamblers beat randomness?. Psychol Addict Behav 18: pp. 143-147 CrossRef
- Boulier, BL, Stekler, HL (1999) Are sports seedings good predictors?: an evaluation. International J Forecasting 15: pp. 83-91 CrossRef
- Vergin, RC, Sosik, JJ (1999) No place like home: an examination of the home field advantage in gambling strategies in NFL football. J Econ Bus 51: pp. 21-31 CrossRef
- Carron, AV, Loughhead, TM, Bray, SR (2005) The home advantage in sport competitions: Courneya and Carron's (1992) conceptual framework a decade later. J Sports Sci 23: pp. 395-407 CrossRef
- Forrest, D, Simmons, R (2002) Outcome uncertainty and attendance demand in sport: the case of English soccer. J Royal Stat Soc: Series D, Statistician 51: pp. 229-241 CrossRef
- Forrest, D, Beaumont, J, Goddard, J, Simmons, R (2005) Home advantage and the debate about competitive balance in professional sports leagues. J Sports Sci 23: pp. 439-445 CrossRef
- Rogers, P (1998) The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling: a theoretical review. J Gambl Stud 14: pp. 111-134 CrossRef
- Gilovich, T (1983) Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. J Pers Soc Psychol 44: pp. 1110-1126 CrossRef
- Ladouceur, R, Giroux, I, Jacques, C (1998) Winning on the horses: how much strategy and knowledge are needed?. J Psychol 132: pp. 133-142 CrossRef
- Nelson, TF, LaBrie, RA, LaPlante, DA, Stanton, M, Shaffer, HJ, Wechsler, H (2007) Sports betting and other gambling in athletes, fans, and other college students. Res Q Exerc Sport 78: pp. 271-283 CrossRef
- Weinstock, J, Whelan, JP, Meyers, AW, Watson, JM (2007) Gambling behavior of student-athletes and a student cohort: what are the odds?. J Gambl Stud 23: pp. 13-24 CrossRef
- Sierra, J, Hyman, M (2009) In search of value: a model of wagering intentions. J Marketing Theory Pract 17: pp. 235-249 CrossRef
- Effects of expertise on football betting
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
- Online Date
- May 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Sport betting
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Geneva University Hospitals, Grand-pré 70 C, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland
- 2. Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
- 3. Addiction Division, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada