Effects of expertise on football betting
Football (soccer) is one of the most popular sports in the world, including Europe. It is associated with important betting activities. A common belief, widely spread among those who participate in gambling activities, is that knowledge and expertise on football lead to better prediction skills for match outcomes. If unfounded, however, this belief should be considered as a form of “illusion of control.” The aim of this study was to examine whether football experts are better than nonexperts at predicting football match scores.
Two hundred and fifty-eight persons took part in the study: 21.3% as football experts, 54.3% as laypersons (non-initiated to football), and 24.4% as football amateurs. They predicted the scores of the first 10 matches of the 2008 UEFA European Football Championship. Logistic regressions were carried out to assess the link between the accuracy of the forecasted scores and the expertise of the participants (expert, amateur, layperson), controlling for age and gender.
The variables assessed did not predict the accuracy of scoring prognosis (R2 ranged from 1% to 6%).
Expertise, age, and gender did not appear to have an impact on the accuracy of the football match prognoses. Therefore, the belief that football expertise improves betting skills is no more than a cognitive distortion called the “illusion of control.” Gamblers may benefit from psychological interventions that target the illusion of control related to their believed links between betting skills and football expertise. Public health policies may need to consider the phenomenon in order to prevent problem gambling related to football betting.
- Maher A, Wilson N, Signal L, Thomson G: Patterns of sports sponsorship by gambling, alcohol and food companies: an Internet survey. BMC Publ Health 2006, 6:95. CrossRef
- Peltzer K, Mabilu MG, Mathoho SF, Nekhwevha AP, Sikhwivhilu T, Sinthumule TS: Trauma history and severity of gambling involvement among horse-race gamblers in a South African gambling setting. Psychol Rep 2006, 99:472–476. CrossRef
- Labrie RA, Laplante DA, Nelson SE, Schumann A, Shaffer HJ: Assessing the playing field: a prospective longitudinal study of Internet sports gambling behavior. J Gambl Stud 2007, 23:347–362. CrossRef
- Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Cochand S, Jermann F, Osiek C, Bondolfi G, Zullino D: Quality of web-based information on pathological gambling. J Gambl Stud 2008, 24:357–366. CrossRef
- Coquard O, Fernandez S, Zullino D, Khazaal Y: A follow-up study on the quality of alcohol dependence-related information on the web. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2011, 6:13. CrossRef
- Langer E: The illusion of control. J Pers Soc Psychol 1975, 32:311–328. CrossRef
- Toneatto T, Blitz-Miller T, Calderwood K, Dragonetti R, Tsanos A: Cognitive distortions in heavy gambling. J Gambl Stud 1997, 13:253–266. CrossRef
- Tavares H, Martins SS, Lobo DS, Silveira CM, Gentil V, Hodgins DC: Factors at play in faster progression for female pathological gamblers: an exploratory analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 2003, 64:433–438. CrossRef
- Cantinotti M, Ladouceur R, Jacques C: Sports betting: can gamblers beat randomness? Psychol Addict Behav 2004, 18:143–147. CrossRef
- Boulier BL, Stekler HL: Are sports seedings good predictors?: an evaluation. International J Forecasting 1999, 15:83–91. CrossRef
- Vergin RC, Sosik JJ: No place like home: an examination of the home field advantage in gambling strategies in NFL football. J Econ Bus 1999, 51:21–31. CrossRef
- Carron AV, Loughhead TM, Bray SR: The home advantage in sport competitions: Courneya and Carron's (1992) conceptual framework a decade later. J Sports Sci 2005,23(4):395–407. CrossRef
- Forrest D, Simmons R: Outcome uncertainty and attendance demand in sport: the case of English soccer. J Royal Stat Soc: Series D, Statistician 2002,51(2):229–241. CrossRef
- Forrest D, Beaumont J, Goddard J, Simmons R: Home advantage and the debate about competitive balance in professional sports leagues. J Sports Sci 2005,23(4):439–445. CrossRef
- Rogers P: The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling: a theoretical review. J Gambl Stud 1998, 14:111–134. CrossRef
- Gilovich T: Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983, 44:1110–1126. CrossRef
- Ladouceur R, Giroux I, Jacques C: Winning on the horses: how much strategy and knowledge are needed? J Psychol 1998, 132:133–142. CrossRef
- Nelson TF, LaBrie RA, LaPlante DA, Stanton M, Shaffer HJ, Wechsler H: Sports betting and other gambling in athletes, fans, and other college students. Res Q Exerc Sport 2007, 78:271–283. CrossRef
- Weinstock J, Whelan JP, Meyers AW, Watson JM: Gambling behavior of student-athletes and a student cohort: what are the odds? J Gambl Stud 2007, 23:13–24. CrossRef
- Sierra J, Hyman M: In search of value: a model of wagering intentions. J Marketing Theory Pract 2009, 17:235–249. CrossRef
- Effects of expertise on football betting
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
- Online Date
- May 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Sport betting
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Geneva University Hospitals, Grand-pré 70 C, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland
- 2. Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
- 3. Addiction Division, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada