Micro ecosystems from feed industry surfaces: a survival and biofilm study of Salmonella versus host resident flora strains
The presence of Salmonella enterica serovars in feed ingredients, products and processing facilities is a well recognized problem worldwide. In Norwegian feed factories, strict control measures are implemented to avoid establishment and spreading of Salmonella throughout the processing chain. There is limited knowledge on the presence and survival of the resident microflora in feed production plants. Information on interactions between Salmonella and other bacteria in feed production plants and how they affect survival and biofilm formation of Salmonella is also limited. The aim of this study was to identify resident microbiota found in feed production environments, and to compare the survival of resident flora strains and Salmonella to stress factors typically found in feed processing environments. Moreover, the role of dominant resident flora strains in the biofilm development of Salmonella was determined.
Surface microflora characterization from two feed productions plants, by means of 16 S rDNA sequencing, revealed a wide diversity of bacteria. Survival, disinfection and biofilm formation experiments were conducted on selected dominant resident flora strains and Salmonella. Results showed higher survival properties by resident flora isolates for desiccation, and disinfection compared to Salmonella isolates. Dual-species biofilms favored Salmonella growth compared to Salmonella in mono-species biofilms, with biovolume increases of 2.8-fold and 3.2-fold in the presence of Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas, respectively.
These results offer an overview of the microflora composition found in feed industry processing environments, their survival under relevant stresses and their potential effect on biofilm formation in the presence of Salmonella. Eliminating the establishment of resident flora isolates in feed industry surfaces is therefore of interest for impeding conditions for Salmonella colonization and growth on feed industry surfaces. In-depth investigations are still needed to determine whether resident flora has a definite role in the persistence of Salmonella in feed processing environments.
- Davies RH, Wray C: Distribution of Salmonella contamination in ten animal feedmills. Vet Microbiol 1997, 57 (2–3) : 159–169. CrossRef
- Møretrø T, Midtgaard ES, Nesse LL, Langsrud S: Susceptibility of Salmonella isolated from fish feed factories to disinfectants and air-drying at surfaces. Vet Microbiol 2003, 94 (3) : 207–217. CrossRef
- Shapcott RC: Practical aspects of Salmonella control. Progress report on a programme in a large broiler integration. In Proceedings of the international Symposium on Salmonella. Edited by: Snoeyenbos GH. Kennett Square, PA, USA: American Association of Avian Pathology; 1984:109–114.
- Crump JA, Griffin PM, Angulo FJ: Bacterial contamination of animal feed and its relationship to human foodborne illness. Clin Infect Dis 2002, 35 (7) : 859–865. CrossRef
- Davis MA, Hancock DD, Rice DH, Call DR, DiGiacomo R, Samadpour M, Besser TE: Feedstuffs as a vehicle of cattle exposure to Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica . Vet Microbiol 2003, 95 (3) : 199–210. CrossRef
- Nesse LL, Nordby K, Heir E, Bergsjoe B, Vardund T, Nygaard H, Holstad G: Molecular analyses of Salmonella enterica isolates from fish feed factories and fish feed ingredients. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69 (2) : 1075–1081. CrossRef
- Nesse LL, Refsum T, Heir E, Nordby K, Vardund T, Holstad G: Molecular epidemiology of Salmonella spp. isolates from gulls, fish-meal factories, feed factories, animals and humans in Norway based on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Epidemiol Infect 2005, 133 (1) : 53–58. CrossRef
- Dargatz DA, Strohmeyer RA, Morley PS, Hyatt DR, Salman MD: Characterization of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica from cattle feed ingredients. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2005, 2 (4) : 341–347. CrossRef
- Davies PR, Scott Hurd H, Funk JA, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Jones FT: The role of contaminated feed in the epidemiology and control of Salmonella enterica in pork production. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2004, 1 (4) : 202–215. CrossRef
- Hacking WC, Mitchell WR, Carlson HC: Salmonella investigation in an Ontario feed mill. Can J Comp Med 1978, 42 (4) : 400–406.
- Jones FT, Axtell RC, Rives DV, Scheideler SE, Tarver JFR, Walker RL, Wineland MJ: A survey of Salmonella contamination in modern broiler production. J Food Prot 1991, 54: 502–507.
- Maciorowski KG, Herrera P, Jones FT, Pillai SD, Ricke SC: Cultural and Immunological Detection Methods for Salmonella spp. in Animal Feeds - A Review. Vet Res Commun 2006, 30 (2) : 127–137. CrossRef
- Møretrø T, Vestby LK, Nesse LL, Storheim SE, Kotlarz K, Langsrud S: Evaluation of efficacy of disinfectants against Salmonella from the feed industry. J Appl Microbiol 2009, 106 (3) : 1005–1012. CrossRef
- Vestby LK, Møretrø T, Langsrud S, Heir E, Nesse LL: Biofilm forming abilities of Salmonella are correlated with persistence in fish meal- and feed factories. BMC Vet Res 2009, 5: 20. CrossRef
- Vestby LK, Møretrø T, Ballance S, Langsrud S, Nesse LL: Survival potential of wild type cellulose deficient Salmonella from the feed industry. BMC Vet Res 2009, 5 (1) : 43. CrossRef
- Joseph B, Otta SK, Karunasagar I: Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. on food contact surfaces and their sensitivity to sanitizers. Int J Food Microbiol 2001, 64 (3) : 367–372. CrossRef
- Habimana O, Meyrand M, Meylheuc T, Kulakauskas S, Briandet R: Genetic features of resident biofilms determine attachment of Listeria monocytogenes . Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75 (24) : 7814–7821. CrossRef
- Habimana O, Heir E, Langsrud S, Asli AW, Møretrø T: Enhanced surface colonization of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in biofilms of an Acinetobacter calcoaceticus isolate from meat-processing environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76 (13) : 4557–4559. CrossRef
- Marouani-Gadri N, Augier G, Carpentier B: Characterization of bacterial strains isolated from a beef-processing plant following cleaning and disinfection - Influence of isolated strains on biofilm formation by Sakai and EDL 933 E. coli O157:H7. Int J Food Microbiol 2009, 133 (1–2) : 62–67. CrossRef
- Boqvist S, Hansson I, Nord Bjerselius U, Hamilton C, Wahlstrom H, Noll B, Tysen E, Engvall A: Salmonella isolated from animals and feed production in Sweden between 1993 and 1997. Acta Vet Scand 2003, 44 (3–4) : 181–197. CrossRef
- Sauli I, Danuser J, Geeraerd AH, Van Impe JF, Rufenacht J, Bissig-Choisat B, Wenk C, Stark KD: Estimating the probability and level of contamination with Salmonella of feed for finishing pigs produced in Switzerland--the impact of the production pathway. Int J Food Microbiol 2005, 100 (1–3) : 289–310. CrossRef
- Hanahan D, Jessee J, Bloom FR: Plasmid transformation of Escherichia coli and other bacteria. Methods Enzymol 1991, 204: 63–113. CrossRef
- Blackwood KS, Turenne CY, Harmsen D, Kabani AM: Reassessment of sequence-based targets for identification of bacillus species. J Clin Microbiol 2004, 42 (4) : 1626–1630. CrossRef
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990, 215 (3) : 403–410.
- Møretrø T, Heir E, Mo KR, Habimana O, Abdelgani A, Langsrud S: Factors affecting survival of Shigatoxin-producing Escherichia coli on abiotic surfaces. Int J Food Microbiol 2010, 138 (1–2) : 71–77. CrossRef
- Stewart PS, Rayner J, Roe F, Rees WM: Biofilm penetration and disinfection efficacy of alkaline hypochlorite and chlorosulfamates. J Appl Microbiol 2001, 91 (3) : 525–532. CrossRef
- Xavier JB, White DC, Almeida JS: Automated biofilm morphology quantification from confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging. Water Sci Technol 2003, 47 (5) : 31–37.
- Maciorowski KG, Herrera P, Kundinger MM, Ricke SC: Animal feed production and contamination by foodborne Salmonella . Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 2006, 1: 197–209.
- Fuster-Valls N, Hernández-Herrero M, Marín-de-Mateo M, Rodríguez-Jerez JJ: Effect of different environmental conditions on the bacteria survival on stainless steel surfaces. Food Control 2008, 19: 308–314. CrossRef
- Cucarella C, Solano C, Valle J, Amorena B, Lasa I, Penades JR: Bap, a Staphylococcus aureus surface protein involved in biofilm formation. J Bacteriol 2001, 183 (9) : 2888–2896. CrossRef
- Gross M, Cramton SE, Gotz F, Peschel A: Key role of teichoic acid net charge in Staphylococcus aureus colonization of artificial surfaces. Infect Immun 2001, 69 (5) : 3423–3426. CrossRef
- Herrera JJ, Cabo ML, Gonzalez A, Pazos I, Pastoriza L: Adhesion and detachment kinetics of several strains of Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus under three different experimental conditions. Food Microbiol 2007, 24 (6) : 585–591. CrossRef
- Mallidis CG, Scholefield J: Relation of the heat resistance of bacterial spores to chemical composition and structure. II. Relation to cortex and structure. J Appl Bacteriol 1987, 63 (3) : 207–215.
- Beaman TC, Gerhardt P: Heat resistance of bacterial spores correlated with protoplast dehydration, mineralization, and thermal adaptation. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986, 52 (6) : 1242–1246.
- Nakashio S, Gerhardt P: Protoplast dehydration correlated with heat resistance of bacterial spores. J Bacteriol 1985, 162 (2) : 571–578.
- Marquis RE, Bender GR: Mineralization and heat resistance of bacterial spores. J Bacteriol 1985, 161 (2) : 789–791.
- Soper CJ, Davies DJ: The heat resistance of bacterial spores after different vacuum drying treatments. J Pharm Pharmacol 1971, 23: 256S.
- Jones FT, Richardson KE: Salmonella in commercially manufactured feeds. Poult Sci 2004, 83 (3) : 384–391.
- Whyte P, McGill K, Collins JD: A survey of the prevalence of Salmonella and other enteric pathogens in a commercial poultry feed mill. Journal of Food Safety 2004, 23 (01) : 13–24. CrossRef
- Janning B, in 't Veld PH, Notermans S, Kramer J: Resistance of bacterial strains to dry conditions: use of anhydrous silica gel in a desiccation model system. J Appl Bacteriol 1994, 77 (3) : 319–324.
- Kramer A, Schwebke I, Kampf G: How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2006, 6: 130. CrossRef
- Prescott L, Harley JP, Klein DA: Microbiology. Sixth edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2004.
- Carpentier B, Cerf O: Biofilms and their consequences, with particular reference to hygiene in the food industry. J Appl Bacteriol 1993, 75 (6) : 499–511.
- Chmielewski RAN, Frank JF: Biofilm Formation and Control in Food Processing Facilities. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2003, 2: 22–32. CrossRef
- Leriche V, Chassaing D, Carpentier B: Behaviour of L. monocytogenes in an artificially made biofilm of a nisin-producing strain of Lactococcus lactis . Int J Food Microbiol 1999, 51 (2–3) : 169–182. CrossRef
- Carpentier B, Chassaing D: Interactions in biofilms between Listeria monocytogenes and resident microorganisms from food industry premises. Int J Food Microbiol 2004, 97 (2) : 111–122. CrossRef
- Jones K, Bradshaw SB: Synergism in biofilm formation between Salmonella enteritidis and a nitrogen-fixing strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae . J Appl Microbiol 1997, 82 (5) : 663–668.
- Micro ecosystems from feed industry surfaces: a survival and biofilm study of Salmonella versus host resident flora strains
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
BMC Veterinary Research
- Online Date
- November 2010
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links