Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot ARMin II in chronic stroke patients: four single-cases
Robot-assisted therapy offers a promising approach to neurorehabilitation, particularly for severely to moderately impaired stroke patients. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of intensive arm training on motor performance in four chronic stroke patients using the robot ARMin II.
ARMin II is an exoskeleton robot with six degrees of freedom (DOF) moving shoulder, elbow and wrist joints. Four volunteers with chronic (≥ 12 months post-stroke) left side hemi-paresis and different levels of motor severity were enrolled in the study. They received robot-assisted therapy over a period of eight weeks, three to four therapy sessions per week, each session of one hour.
Patients 1 and 4 had four one-hour training sessions per week and patients 2 and 3 had three one-hour training sessions per week. Primary outcome variable was the Fugl-Meyer Score of the upper extremity Assessment (FMA), secondary outcomes were the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS), the Maximal Voluntary Torques (MVTs) and a questionnaire about ADL-tasks, progress, changes, motivation etc.
Three out of four patients showed significant improvements (p < 0.05) in the main outcome. The improvements in the FMA scores were aligned with the objective results of MVTs. Most improvements were maintained or even increased from discharge to the six-month follow-up.
Data clearly indicate that intensive arm therapy with the robot ARMin II can significantly improve motor function of the paretic arm in some stroke patients, even those in a chronic state. The findings of the study provide a basis for a subsequent controlled randomized clinical trial.
- Thorvaldsen P, Asplund K, Kuulasmaa K, Rajakangas AM, Schroll M: Stroke incidence, case fatality, and mortality in the WHO MONICA project. World Health Organization Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease. Stroke 1995, 26:361–367.
- Brainin M, Bornstein N, Boysen G, Demarin V: Acute neurological stroke care in Europe: results of the European Stroke Care Inventory. Eur J Neurol 2000, 7:5–10. CrossRef
- Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, et al.: Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2007, 115:e69–171. CrossRef
- Maeurer HC, Diener HC: Der Schlaganfall Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag 1996.
- Rossini PM, Calautti C, Pauri F, Baron JC: Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain. Lancet Neurol 2003, 2:493–502. CrossRef
- Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS: Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994, 75:394–398. CrossRef
- Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, Dorsey L, Rundquist P, Ugurbil K: Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain 2002, 125:773–788. CrossRef
- Lee J, Wagenaar R, Lankhorst G, Vogelaar T, Deville W, Bouter L: Forced Use of the Upper Extremity in Chronic Stroke Patients: Results From a Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Stroke 1999, 30:2369–2375.
- Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC: Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke 1997, 28:1550–1556.
- Sunderland A, Tinson DJ, Bradley EL, Fletcher D, Langton Hewer R, Wade DT: Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992, 55:530–535. CrossRef
- Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH: Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995, 130:59–68. CrossRef
- Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood Dauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, Miller K, Lincoln N, Partridge C, Wellwood I, Langhorne P: Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004, 35:2529–2539. CrossRef
- Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A: Qualitative analysis of stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation. BMJ 2000, 321:1051–1054. CrossRef
- Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Loos M: Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83:952–959. CrossRef
- Reinkensmeyer DJ, Emken JL, Cramer SC: Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004, 6:497–525. CrossRef
- Riener R, Nef T, Colombo G: Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities. Med Biol Eng Comput 2005, 43:2–10. CrossRef
- Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens HJ, Ijzerman MJ: Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006, 43:171–184. CrossRef
- Nelles G: Cortical reorganization--effects of intensive therapy. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004, 22:239–244.
- Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI: Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008, 22:111–121.
- Wade DT: Evaluating outcome in stroke rehabilitation (quality control and clinical audit). Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 1992, 26:97–104.
- Nef T, Mihelj M, Riener R: ARMin: a robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007, 45:887–900. CrossRef
- Mihelj M, Nef T, Riener R: A novel paradigm for patient-cooperative control of upper limb rehabilitation robots. Advanced Robotics 2007, 21:843–867. CrossRef
- Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hughes R, Hogan N: Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004, 85:1106–1111. CrossRef
- Nef T, Guidali M, Riener R: ARMin III - Arm therapy exoskeleton with an ergonomic shoulder actuation. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 2009, 6:127–142. CrossRef
- Nef T, Quinter G, Muller R, Riener R: Effects of Arm Training with the Robotic Device ARMin I in Chronic Stroke: Three Single Cases. Neurodegener Dis 2009, in press.
- Bayona NA, Bitensky J, Salter K, Teasell R: The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies. Top Stroke Rehabil 2005, 12:58–65.
- Carey JR, Bhatt E, Nagpal A: Neuroplasticity promoted by task complexity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2005, 33:24–31.
- Carr JH, Shepherd RB: A motor learning model for rehabilitation. Movement science: foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation Rockville (MD): Aspen 1987, 31–91.
- Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S: The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975, 7:13–31.
- Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG: Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther 1983, 63:1606–1610.
- Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE: The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002, 16:232–240. CrossRef
- Amirabdollahian F, Loureiro R, Gradwell E, Collin C, Harwin W, Johnson G: Multivariate analysis of the Fugl-Meyer outcome measures assessing the effectiveness of GENTLE/S robot-mediated stroke therapy. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2007, 4:4. CrossRef
- Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A: Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001, 32:1635–1639.
- Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW, Taub E: The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001, 82:750–755. CrossRef
- Azouvi P, Olivier S, de Montety G, Samuel C, Louis-Dreyfus A, Tesio L: Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:51–57. CrossRef
- Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Wade DT: Visuospatial neglect: underlying factors and test sensitivity. Lancet 1989, 2:908–911. CrossRef
- Ditunno JF Jr, Young W, Donovan WH, Creasey G: The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Paraplegia 1994, 32:70–80.
- Parker RI: Increased reliability for single-case research results: is the bootstrap the answer? Behav Ther 2006, 37:326–338. CrossRef
- Volpe BT, Lynch D, Rykman-Berland A, Ferraro M, Galgano M, Hogan N, Krebs HI: Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008, 22:305–310. CrossRef
- Krebs HI, Mernoff S, Fasoli SE, Hughes R, Stein J, Hogan N: A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: a pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation 2008, 23:81–87.
- Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Williams D, Celestino J, Charles SK, Lynch D, Hogan N: Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: a robot for wrist rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007, 15:327–335. CrossRef
- Coote S, Murphy B, Harwin W, Stokes E: The effect of the GENTLE/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2008, 22:395–405. CrossRef
- McCombe Waller S, Whitall J: Hand dominance and side of stroke affect rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil 2005, 19:544–551. CrossRef
- Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, Weiller C: Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000, 31:1210–1216.
- Sullivan JE, Hedman LD: Sensory dysfunction following stroke: incidence, significance, examination, and intervention. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008, 15:200–217. CrossRef
- Cirstea MC, Ptito A, Levin MF: Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke. Exp Brain Res 2003, 152:476–488. CrossRef
- Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Aisen ML, Hogan N: Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000, 37:639–652.
- Reinkensmeyer DJ, Kahn LE, Averbuch M, McKenna-Cole A, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ: Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000, 37:653–662.
- Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C: Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:915–920. CrossRef
- Beer RF, Dewald JP, Rymer WZ: Deficits in the coordination of multijoint arm movements in patients with hemiparesis: evidence for disturbed control of limb dynamics. Exp Brain Res 2000, 131:305–319. CrossRef
- Dewald JP, Beer RF: Abnormal joint torque patterns in the paretic upper limb of subjects with hemiparesis. Muscle Nerve 2001, 24:273–283. CrossRef
- Ellis MD, Holubar BG, Acosta AM, Beer RF, Dewald JP: Modifiability of abnormal isometric elbow and shoulder joint torque coupling after stroke. Muscle Nerve 2005, 32:170–178. CrossRef
- Sukal TM, Ellis MD, Dewald JP: Source of work area reduction following hemiparetic stroke and preliminary intervention using the ACT3D system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006, 1:177–180. CrossRef
- Mehrholz J, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M: Electromechanical and Robot-Assisted Arm Training for Improving Arm Function and Activities of Daily Living After Stroke. Stroke 2009, 40:392–393. CrossRef
- Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot ARMin II in chronic stroke patients: four single-cases
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
- Online Date
- December 2009
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Sensory-Motor Systems Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
- 2. Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University Zurich, Switzerland
- 3. Department of Biology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
- 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, Washington D.C., USA
- 5. Center for Applied Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Research, National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington D.C., USA