Intrathoracic versus Cervical Anastomosis after Resection of Esophageal Cancer: A matched pair analysis of 72 patients in a single center study
The aim of this study was to analyze the early postoperative outcome of esophageal cancer treated by subtotal esophageal resection, gastric interposition and either intrathoracic or cervical anastomosis in a single center study.
72 patients who received either a cervical or intrathoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection for esophageal cancer were matched by age and tumor stage. Collected data from these patients were analyzed retrospectively regarding morbidity and mortality rates.
Anastomotic leakage rate was significantly lower in the intrathoracic anastomosis group than in the cervical anastomosis group (4 of 36 patients (11%) vs. 11 of 36 patients (31%); p = 0.040). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the intrathoracic anastomosis group compared to the cervical anastomosis group (14 (range 10–110) vs. 26 days (range 12 – 105); p = 0.012). Wound infection and temporary paresis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve occurred significantly more often in the cervical anastomosis group compared to the intrathoracic anastomosis group (28% vs. 0%; p = 0.002 and 11% vs. 0%; p = 0.046). The overall In-hospital mortality rate was 6% (4 of 72 patients) without any differences between the study groups.
The present data support the assumption that the transthoracic approach with an intrathoracic anastomosis compared to a cervical esophagogastrostomy is the safer and more beneficial procedure in patients with carcinoma of the lower and middle third of the esophagus due to a significant reduction of anastomotic leakage, wound infection, paresis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve and shorter hospital stay.
- Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ: Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis6. Ann Thorac Surg 2001, 72:306–313. CrossRef
- Chu KM, Law SY, Fok M, Wong J: A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma106. Am J Surg 1997, 174:320–324. CrossRef
- Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD: Transhiatal esophagectomy for treatment of benign and malignant esophageal disease6. World J Surg 2001, 25:196–203. CrossRef
- Gockel I, Heckhoff S, Messow CM, et al.: Transhiatal and transthoracic resection in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: does the operative approach have an influence on the long-term prognosis?2. World J Surg Oncol 2005, 3:40. CrossRef
- Dewar L, Gelfand G, Finley RJ, et al.: Factors affecting cervical anastomotic leak and stricture formation following esophagogastrectomy and gastric tube interposition. Am J Surg 1992, 163:484–489. CrossRef
- Johansson J, Demeester TR, Hagen JA, et al.: En bloc vs transhiatal esophagectomy for stage T3 N1 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus6. Arch Surg 2004, 139:627–631. CrossRef
- Siewert JR, Stein HJ, Bartels H: Anastomotic leaks in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Chirurg 2004, 75:1063–1070. CrossRef
- Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al.: Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer3. N Engl J Med 2006, 355:11–20. CrossRef
- Walther B, Johansson J, Johnsson F, et al.: Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. Ann Surg 2003, 238:803–812. CrossRef
- Tilanus HW, Hop WC, Langenhorst BL, van Lanschot JJ: Esophagectomy with or without thoracotomy. Is there any difference? 8. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993, 105:898–903.
- Horstmann O, Verreet PR, Becker H, et al.: Transhiatal oesophagectomy compared with transthoracic resection and systematic lymphadenectomy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer4. Eur J Surg 1995, 161:557–567.
- Putnam JB, Suell DM, McMurtrey MJ, et al.: Comparison of three techniques of esophagectomy within a residency training program2. Ann Thorac Surg 1994, 57:319–325. CrossRef
- Jauch KW, Bacha EA, Denecke H, et al.: Esophageal carcinoma: prognostic features and comparison between blunt transhiatal dissection and transthoracic resection1. Eur J Surg Oncol 1992, 18:553–562.
- Biere SS, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL: Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg 2011, 28:29–35. CrossRef
- Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al.: Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus1. N Engl J Med 2002, 347:1662–1669. CrossRef
- Rentz J, Bull D, Harpole D, et al.: Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003, 125:1114–1120. CrossRef
- Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J: Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 1997, 226:169–173. CrossRef
- Hsu HH, Chen JS, Huang PM, et al.: Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004, 25:1097–1101. CrossRef
- Okuyama M, Motoyama S, Suzuki H, et al.: Hand-sewn cervical anastomosis versus stapled intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for middle or lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Today 2007, 37:947–952. CrossRef
- Kim RH, Takabe K: Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review. J Surg Oncol 2010, 101:527–533. CrossRef
- Boyle MJ, Franceschi D, Livingstone AS: Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy: complication and survival rates2. Am Surg 1999, 65:1137–1141.
- Rindani R, Martin CJ, Cox MR: Transhiatal versus Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: is there a difference?1. Aust N Z J Surg 1999, 69:187–194. CrossRef
- Chasseray VM, Kiroff GK, Buard JL, Launois B: Cervical or thoracic anastomosis for esophagectomy for carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989, 169:55–62.
- Morgan MA, Lewis WG, Hopper AN, et al.: Prospective comparison of transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer3. Dis Esophagus 2007, 20:225–231. CrossRef
- Siewert JR, Stein HJ: Lymph-node dissection in squamous cell esophageal cancer – who benefits?5. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1999, 384:141–148. CrossRef
- Tsurumaru M, Kajiyama Y, Udagawa H, Akiyama H: Outcomes of extended lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus1. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001, 7:325–329.
- Ribet M, Debrueres B, Lecomte-Houcke M: Resection for advanced cancer of the thoracic esophagus: cervical or thoracic anastomosis? Late results of a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992, 103:784–789.
- Kayani B, Jarral OA, Athanasiou T, Zacharakis E: Should oesophagectomy be performed with cervical or intrathoracic anastomosis? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012,14(6):821–826. CrossRef
- Intrathoracic versus Cervical Anastomosis after Resection of Esophageal Cancer: A matched pair analysis of 72 patients in a single center study
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Online Date
- August 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Esophageal cancer
- Esophageal resection
- Cervical anastomosis
- Intrathoracic anastomosis
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Aachen, Germany
- 4. Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- 2. Department of Medical Statistics, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
- 3. Department of General, Visceral and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Helios Hospital Emil von Behring, Berlin, Germany