Patients undergoing subacute rehabilitation have accurate expectations of their health-related quality of life at discharge
Expectations held by patients and health professionals may affect treatment choices and participation (by both patients and health professionals) in therapeutic interventions in contemporary patient-centered healthcare environments. If patients in rehabilitation settings overestimate their discharge health-related quality of life, they may become despondent as their progress falls short of their expectations. On the other hand, underestimating their discharge health-related quality of life may lead to a lack of motivation to participate in therapies if they do not perceive likely benefit. There is a scarcity of empirical evidence evaluating whether patients’ expectations of future health states are accurate. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy with which older patients admitted for subacute in-hospital rehabilitation can anticipate their discharge health-related quality of life.
A prospective longitudinal cohort investigation of agreement between patients’ anticipated discharge health-related quality of life (as reported on the EQ-5D instrument at admission to a rehabilitation unit) and their actual self-reported health-related quality of life at the time of discharge from this unit was undertaken. The mini-mental state examination was used as an indicator of patients’ cognitive ability.
Overall, 232(85%) patients had all assessment data completed and were included in analysis. Kappa scores ranged from 0.42-0.68 across the five EQ-5D domains and two patient cognition groups. The percentage of exact correct matches within each domain ranged from 69% to 85% across domains and cognition groups. Overall 40% of participants in each cognition group correctly anticipated all of their self-reported discharge EQ-5D domain responses.
Patients admitted for subacute in-hospital rehabilitation were able to anticipate their discharge health-related quality of life on the EQ-5D instrument with a moderate level of accuracy. This finding adds to the foundational empirical work supporting joint treatment decision making and patient-centered models of care during rehabilitation following acute illness or injury. Accurate patient expectations of the impact of treatment (or disease progression) on future health-related related quality of life is likely to allow patients and health professionals to successfully target interventions to priority areas where meaningful gains can be achieved.
- Kelly-Powell ML: Personalizing choices: patients' experiences with making treatment decisions. Res Nurs Health 1997,20(3):219–227. CrossRef
- van der Eijk M, Faber MJ, Al Shamma S, Munneke M, Bloem BR: Moving towards patient-centered healthcare for patients with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2011,17(5):360–364. CrossRef
- Sandman L, Munthe C: Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Health Care Anal 2010,18(1):60–84. CrossRef
- McPhail S, Comans T, Haines T: Evidence of disagreement between patient-perceived change and conventional longitudinal evaluation of change in health-related quality of life among older adults. Clin Rehabil 2010,24(11):1036–1044. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20702509 CrossRef
- McPhail S, Haines T: Response shift, recall bias and their effect on measuring change in health-related quality of life amongst older hospital patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010,8(1):65. CrossRef
- Berk ML, Monheit AC: The concentration of health care expenditures, revisited. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 2001,20(2):9–18. CrossRef
- Ashworth NL, Chad KE, Harrison EL, Reeder BA, Marshall SC: Home versus center based physical activity programs in older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005, (1):Art. No: CD004017. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15674925
- Bourdeau I, Desrosiers J, Gosselin S: Predictors of reintegration to normal living in older adults discharged from an intensive rehabilitation program. Int J Rehabil Res 2008,31(4):267–274. CrossRef
- Haines T, Kuys SS, Morrison G, Clarke J, Bew P, McPhail S: Development and validation of the balance outcome measure for elder rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007,88(12):1614–1621. CrossRef
- Blickem C, Priyadharshini E: Patient narratives: the potential for "patient-centred" interprofessional learning? J Interprof Care 2007,21(6):619–632. CrossRef
- Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Ford G: Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke. Stroke 2000,31(8):2004–2010. CrossRef
- Carr AJ, Higginson IJ: Are quality of life measures patient centred? BMJ 2001,322(7298):1357–1360. CrossRef
- Clarke S, Hickey A, O'Boyle C, Hardiman O: Assessing individual quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Qual Life Res 2001,10(2):149–158. CrossRef
- Conboy LA, Macklin E, Kelley J, Kokkotou E, Lembo A, Kaptchuk T: Which patients improve: Characteristics increasing sensitivity to a supportive patient-practitioner relationship. Soc Sci Med 2009.
- Richards S, Cristian A: The role of the physical therapist in the care of the older adult. Clin Geriatr Med 2006,22(2):269–279. viii CrossRef
- Schwartz CE, Cole BF, Gelber RD: Measuring patient-centered outcomes in neurologic disease. Extending the Q-TWiST method. Arch Neurol 1995,52(8):754–762. CrossRef
- Schwartzberg J: Low health literacy: what do your patients really understand? Nurs Econ 2002, 20:145–147.
- Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levasseur M: 'Optimal' participation: a reflective look. Disabil Rehabil 2006,28(19):1231–1235. CrossRef
- Rabin R, de Charro F: EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001,33(5):337–343. CrossRef
- Dolan P, Roberts J: Modelling valuations for Eq-5d health states: an alternative model using differences in valuations. Med Care 2002,40(5):442–446. CrossRef
- Ankri J, Beaufils B, Novella JL, Morrone I, Guillemin F, Jolly D, Ploton L, Blanchard F: Use of the EQ-5D among patients suffering from dementia. J Clin Epidemiol 2003,56(11):1055–1063. CrossRef
- Fransen M, Edmonds J: Reliability and validity of the EuroQol in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 1999,38(9):807–813. CrossRef
- Ghislandi S, Apolone G, Garattini L, Ghislandi I: Is EQ-5D a valid measure of HRQoL in patients with movement disorders? A comparison with SF-36 and FIM questionnaires. Eur J Health Econ 2002,3(2):125–130. CrossRef
- Lang HC, Chuang L, Shun SC, Hsieh CL, Lan CF: Validation of EQ-5D in patients with cervical cancer in Taiwan. Support Care Cancer 2010,18(10):1279–1286. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19941008 CrossRef
- Nowels D, McGloin J, Westfall JM, Holcomb S: Validation of the EQ-5D quality of life instrument in patients after myocardial infarction. Qual Life Res 2005,14(1):95–105. CrossRef
- Schweikert B, Hahmann H, Leidl R: Validation of the EuroQol questionnaire in cardiac rehabilitation. Heart 2006,92(1):62–67. CrossRef
- McPhail S, Lane P, Russell T, Brauer SG, Urry S, Jasiewicz J, Condie P, Haines T: Telephone reliability of the Frenchay Activity Index and EQ-5D amongst older adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009, 7:48. CrossRef
- Chang TJ, Tarn YH, Hsieh CL, Liou WS, Shaw JW, Chiou XG: Taiwanese version of the EQ-5D: validation in a representative sample of the Taiwanese population. J Formos Med Assoc 2007,106(12):1023–1031. CrossRef
- Cleemput I, Kesteloot K, Moons P, Vanrenterghem Y, Van Hooff JP, Squifflet JP, De Geest S: The construct and concurrent validity of the EQ-5D in a renal transplant population. Value Health 2004,7(4):499–509. CrossRef
- Hoeks SE, Smolderen KG, Scholte Op Reimer WJ, Verhagen HJ, Spertus JA, Poldermans D: Clinical validity of a disease-specific health status questionnaire: the peripheral artery questionnaire. J Vasc Surg 2009,49(2):371–377. CrossRef
- Hurst NP, Kind P, Ruta D, Hunter M, Stubbings A: Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D). Br J Rheumatol 1997,36(5):551–559. CrossRef
- Luo N, Chew LH, Fong KY, Koh DR, Ng SC, Yoon KH, Vasoo S, Li SC, Thumboo J: Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D self-report questionnaire in English-speaking Asian patients with rheumatic diseases in Singapore. Qual Life Res 2003,12(1):87–92. CrossRef
- Russell RT, Feurer ID, Wisawatapnimit P, Pinson CW: The validity of EQ-5D US preference weights in liver transplant candidates and recipients. Liver Transpl 2009,15(1):88–95. CrossRef
- Linde L, Sorensen J, Ostergaard M, Horslev-Petersen K, Hetland ML: Health-related quality of life: validity, reliability, and responsiveness of SF-36, 15D, EQ-5D [corrected] RAQoL, and HAQ in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2008,35(8):1528–1537.
- Krabbe PF, Peerenboom L, Langenhoff BS, Ruers TJ: Responsiveness of the generic EQ-5D summary measure compared to the disease-specific EORTC QLQ C-30. Qual Life Res 2004,13(7):1247–1253. CrossRef
- Holland R, Smith RD, Harvey I, Swift L, Lenaghan E: Assessing quality of life in the elderly: a direct comparison of the EQ-5D and AQoL. Health Econ 2004,13(8):793–805. CrossRef
- Xia G, Hwang S, Chang V, Osenenko P, Alejandro Y, Yan H, Toomey K, Srinivas S: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of Euroqol (EQ5D) in patients (Pts) receiving palliative care (PC). J Clin Oncol 2005,23(16S):8082.
- Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Feeny DH: Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke. Qual Life Res 2005,14(1):207–219. CrossRef
- Glasziou P, Alexander J, Beller E, Clarke P: Which health-related quality of life score? A comparison of alternative utility measures in patients with Type 2 diabetes in the ADVANCE trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007, 5:21. CrossRef
- Walters SJ, Brazier JE: Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res 2005,14(6):1523–1532. CrossRef
- Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P: Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975, 12:189–198. CrossRef
- Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ: The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992,40(9):922–935.
- Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975,12(3):189–198. CrossRef
- Anthony C, LaResche L, Niaz U, VonKorff M, Folstein M: Limits of the Mini-Mental State as a screening test for dementia and delerium among hospital patients. Psychol Med 1982, 12:397–408. CrossRef
- Feher E, Mahurin R, Doody R, Cooke N, Sims J, Pirozzolo F: Establishing the limits of the Mini-Mental State. Arch Neurol 1992, 49:87–92. CrossRef
- Lopez MN, Charter RA, Mostafavi B, Nibut LP, Smith WE: Psychometric Properties of the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination. Assessment 2005,12(2):137–144. CrossRef
- Efron B, Tibshirani R: An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York; 1993.
- Lee J, Fung KP: Confidence interval of the kappa coefficient by bootstrap resampling. Psychiatry Res 1993,49(1):97–98. CrossRef
- Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986,1(8476):307–310. CrossRef
- Coteur G, Feagan B, Keininger DL, Kosinski M: Evaluation of the meaningfulness of health-related quality of life improvements as assessed by the SF-36 and the EQ-5D VAS in patients with active Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009,29(9):1032–1041. CrossRef
- Luo N, Chew L-H, Fong K-Y, Koh D-R, Ng S-C, Yoon K-H, Vasoo S, Li S-C, Thumboo J: Do English and Chinese EQ-5D versions demonstrate measurement equivalence? an exploratory study. Health Quality Life Outcomes 2003,1(1):7. CrossRef
- Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D: Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007, 5:70. CrossRef
- Lutz BJ, Bowers BJ: Patient-centered care: understanding its interpretation and implementation in health care. Sch Inq Nurs Pract 2000,14(2):165–183. discussion 183–167
- Hickman LD, Rolley JX, Davidson PM: Can principles of the Chronic Care Model be used to improve care of the older person in the acute care sector? Collegian 2010,17(2):63–69. CrossRef
- LeRouge C, Ma J, De Leo G, Flaherty J: Patient-centered design: conceptually modeling the health care consumer. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008, 1035. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
- Gzil F, Lefeve C, Cammelli M, Pachoud B, Ravaud JF, Leplege A: Why is rehabilitation not yet fully person-centred and should it be more person-centred? Disabil Rehabil 2007,29(20–21):1616–1624. CrossRef
- Ushikubo M: A study of factors facilitating and inhibiting the willingness of the institutionalized disabled elderly for rehabilitation: a United States-Japanese comparison. J Cross Cult Gerontol 1998,13(2):127–157. CrossRef
- Carroll DL: The importance of self-efficacy expectations in elderly patients recovering from coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Lung 1995,24(1):50–59. CrossRef
- Stull DE, Leidy NK, Parasuraman B, Chassany O: Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: challenges and potential solutions. Curr Med Res Opin 2009,25(4):929–942. CrossRef
- McPhail S, Beller E, Haines T: Reference bias: presentation of extreme health states prior to EQ-VAS improves health-related quality of life scores. a randomised cross-over trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010, 8:146. CrossRef
- Patients undergoing subacute rehabilitation have accurate expectations of their health-related quality of life at discharge
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Online Date
- August 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Buranda Plaza, Corner Ipswich Road and Cornwall Street, Buranda, Brisbane, Australia
- 2. Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Public Health & Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Australia
- 3. Southern Health, Allied Health Research Unit, Kingston Centre, Cnr Warrigal and Kingston Roads, Cheltenham, Victoria, Australia
- 4. Physiotherapy Department, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Monash University Peninsular Campus, Victoria, Australia