Comparing virtual consults to traditional consults using an electronic health record: an observational case–control study
Patients have typically received health care through face-to-face encounters. However, expansion of electronic communication and electronic health records (EHRs) provide alternative means for patient and physicians to interact. Electronic consultations may complement regular healthcare by providing “better, faster, cheaper” processes for diagnosing, treating, and monitoring health conditions. Virtual consultation between physicians may provide a method of streamlining care, potentially saving patients the time and expense of added visits. The purpose of this study was to compare physician usage and patient satisfaction with virtual consultations (VCs) with traditional consultations (TCs) facilitated within an EHR.
We conducted an observational case–control survey study within Kaiser Permanente, Colorado. A sample of patients who had VCs requested by physicians (N = 270) were matched with patients who had TCs requested by physicians (N = 270), by patient age, gender, reason for the consult, and specialty department. These patients (VC and TC), were invited to participate in a satisfaction survey. In addition, 205 primary care physicians who submitted a VC or TC were surveyed.
During the study period, 58,146 VC or TC were requested (TC = 96.3%). Patients who completed a satisfaction survey (267 out of 540 patients, 49.4% response rate) indicated they were satisfied with their care, irrespective of the kind of consult (mean 10-point Likert score of 8.5). 88 of 205 primary care physicians surveyed (42.9%) returned at least one survey; VC and TC survey response rates and consulted departments were comparable (p = 0.13). More TCs than VCs requested transfer of patient care (p = 0.03), assistance with diagnosis (p = 0.04) or initiating treatment (p =0.04). Within 3 weeks of the consultation request, 72.1% of respondents reported receiving information from VCs, compared with 33.9% of the TCs (p < 0.001). Utility of information provided by consultants and satisfaction with consultations did not differ between VCs and TCs.
Referring physicians received information from consultants more quickly from VCs compared with TCs, but the value and application of information from both types of consultations were similar. VCs may decrease the need for face-to-face specialty encounters without a decrease in the patient’s perception of care.
- DiMatteo MR, DiMatteo MR: Variations in patients' adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research. Medical Care 2004, 42:200–209. CrossRef
- Vickery DM, Kalmer H, Lowry D, Constantine M, Wright E, Loren W, et al.: Effect of a self-care education program on medical visits. JAMA 1983, 250:2952–2956. CrossRef
- Hersh W, Miller R, Olson D, Sacherek L, Cross P: Professional's Information Link (PiL): a web-based asynchronous consultation service. In Proceedings AMIA 2002 Symposium: 9–13 September 2002. Edited by: Kohane IS. Texas: Hanley and Belfus; 2002:325–329.
- MacFarlane A, Harrison R, Murray E, Berlin A, Wallace P: A qualitative study of the educational potential of joint teleconsultations at the primary-secondary care interface. J Telemed Telecare 2006,12(Suppl 1):22–24. CrossRef
- Wan AC, Gul Y, Darzi A: Realtime remote consultation in the outpatient clinic–experience at a teaching hospital. J Telemed Telecare 1999,5(Suppl 5):70–71. CrossRef
- Umefjord G, Hamberg K, Malker H, Petersson G: The use of an Internet-based Ask the Doctor Service involving family physicians: evaluation by a web survey. Fam Pract 2006, 23:159–166. CrossRef
- Umefjord G, Malker H, Olofsson N, Hensjo LO, Petersson G: Primary care physicians' experiences of carrying out consultations on the internet. Inform Prim Care 2004, 12:85–90.
- Coile RC Jr: "Virtual medicine": the future of American health care. Russ Coiles Health Trends 1999, 11:2–3.
- Gorman P: Information needs in primary care: a survey of rural and nonrural primary care physicians. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001, 84:1–42.
- Gorman P, Yao P, Shshadri V: Finding the answers in primary care: information seeking by rural and nonrural clnicians. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004,107(Pt 2):1133–1137.
- Coumou HC, Meijman FJ: How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. J Med Libr Assoc 2006, 94:55–60.
- Gonzalez-Gonzalez AI, Dawes M, Sanchez-Mateos J, Riesgo-Fuertes R, Escortell-Mayor E, Sanz-Cuesta T, et al.: Information needs and information-seeking behavior of primary care physicians. Ann Fam Med 2007, 5:345–352. CrossRef
- Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss ML, Ebell MH, Rosenbaum ME: Answering physicians' clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005, 12:217–224. CrossRef
- Bennet N, Casebeer L, Zheng S, Kristofco R: Information-seeking behaviors and reflective practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006, 26:120–127. CrossRef
- Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR: Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med 1985, 103:596–599.
- Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, Bergus GR, Levy BT, Chambliss ML, et al.: Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care. BMJ 1999, 319:358–361. CrossRef
- Ramos K, Linscheid R, Schafer S: Real-time information-seeking behavior of residency physicians. Fam Med 2003, 35:257–260.
- Osheroff JA, Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Bankowitz RA, Blumenfeld BH, Miller RA: Physicians' information needs: analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching. Ann Intern Med 1991, 114:576–581.
- Angstman KB, Adamson SC, Furst JW, Houston MS, Rohrer JE: Provider satisfaction with virtual specialist consultations in a family medicine department. Health Care Manag 2009, 28:14–18.
- Howe N, Strauss W: The next 20 years: how customer and workforce attitudes will evolve. Harv Bus Rev 2007, 85:41–52.
- Shershneva MB, Carnes M, Bakken LL: A model of teaching-learning transactions in generalist-specialist consultations. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006, 26:222–229. CrossRef
- Price D: Point of Care Learning: The Ultimate in Meeting CME Need [education session]. Alliance for Continuing Medical Education Annual Meeting. CA: San Francisco; 2005. http://www.acehp.org/imis15/aCME/PDFs/Abstracts/05abs.pdf
- Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Staniszewski A, Steciwko A, Puchala E, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Staniszewski A, et al.: System of telemedicine services designed for family doctors' practices. Telemedicine Journal & E-Health 2000, 6:449–452. CrossRef
- Maass MC, Asikainen P, Maenpaa T, Wanne O, Suominen T, Maass MC, et al.: Usefulness of a Regional Health Care Information System in primary care: a case study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2008, 91:175–181. CrossRef
- Moorman PW, Branger PJ, Van der WJ K, Van der LJ, Moorman PW, Branger PJ, et al.: Electronic messaging between primary and secondary care: a four-year case report. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001, 8:372–378. CrossRef
- Branger PJ, Van't HA, Van der Wouden JC, Moorman PW, Van Bemmel JH, Branger PJ, et al.: Shared care for diabetes: supporting communication between primary and secondary care. Int J Med Inform 1999, 53:133–142. CrossRef
- Hansagi H, Olsson M, Hussain A, Ohlen G, Hansagi H, Olsson M, et al.: Is information sharing between the emergency department and primary care useful to the care of frequent emergency department users? Eur J Emerg Med 2008, 15:34–39. CrossRef
- Whited JD, Hall RP, Foy ME, Marbrey LE, Grambow SC, Dudley TK, et al.: Teledermatology's impact on time to intervention among referrals to a dermatology consult service. Telemedicine Journal & E-Health 2002, 8:313–321. CrossRef
- Biermann E, Rihl J, Schenker M, Standl E, Biermann E, Rihl J, et al.: Semi-automatic generation of medical tele-expert opinion for primary care physician. Methods Inf Med 2003, 42:212–219.
- Foy R, Hempel S, Rubenstein L, Suttorp M, Seelig M, Shanman R, et al.: Meta-analysis: effect of interactive communication between collaborating primary care physicians and specialists. Ann Intern Med 2010, 152:247–258.
- Centering on the Patient: How Electronic Health Records Enable Care Coordination. eHealth Initiative. Washington, D.C; 2011:1–94. http://www.ehealthinitiative.org/resources/finish/73-general/160-centering-on-the-patient-how-electronic-health-records-enable-care-coordination.html
- Adult Ambulatory Care CAHPS survey. 2007. https://www.cahps.ahrq.gov/quality-improvement/~/media/files/quality%20improvement/cahps_amb_pg_041310.pdf
- Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Gorman PN, Ebell MH, Chambliss ML, Pifer EA, et al.: A taxonomy of generic clinical questions: classification study. BMJ 2000, 321:429–432. CrossRef
- Cummings P, McKnight B: Analysis of matched cohort data. The Stata Journal 2004, 4:274–281.
- Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education Updated Accreditation Criteria. 2009. http://www.accme.org/requirements/accreditation-requirements-cme-providers/accreditation-criteria
- Dolcourt JL: Commitment to change: a strategy for promoting educational effectiveness. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2000, 20:156–163. CrossRef
- Wakefield JG: Commitment to change: exploring its role in changing physician behavior through continuing education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2004, 24:197–204. CrossRef
- Wakefield JG, Herbert CP, Maclure M, Dormuth C, Wright JM, Legare J, et al.: Commitment to change statements can predict actual change in practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2003, 23:81–93. CrossRef
- Hussainy SY, Beattie J, Nation RL, Dooley MJ, Fleming J, Wein S, et al.: Palliative care for patients with cancer: what are the educational needs of community pharmacists? Support Care Cancer 2006, 14:177–184. CrossRef
- Price D, Overton C, Duncan J, Wamsley D, Steinbruegge J, Francis L, et al.: Results of the first national Kaiser Permanente continuing medical education needs assessment survey. Permanente Journal 2002, 6:76–84.
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/12/65/prepub
- Comparing virtual consults to traditional consults using an electronic health record: an observational case–control study
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Online Date
- July 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Electronic medical record
- Value of information
- Physician satisfaction
- Patient satisfaction
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Colorado Permanente Medical Group, Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, CO, USA
- 2. Department of Education, Colorado Permanente Medical Group, Institute for Health Research, Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA
- 3. Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Health Plan Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
- 4. Knowledge Management and Implementation, Support, Kaiser Health Plan Colorado, Denver, CO, USA