Visual Aids for Multimodal Treatment Options to Support Decision Making of Patients with Colorectal Cancer
A variety of multimodal treatment options are available for colorectal cancer and many patients want to be involved in decisions about their therapies. However, their desire for autonomy is limited by lack of disease-specific knowledge. Visual aids may be helpful tools to present complex data in an easy-to-understand, graphic form to lay persons. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the treatment preferences of healthy persons and patients using visual aids depicting multimodal treatment options for colorectal cancer.
We designed visual aids for treatment scenarios based on four key studies concerning multimodal treatment of colorectal cancer. The visual aids were composed of diagrams depicting outcome parameters and side effects of two treatment options. They were presented to healthy persons (n = 265) and to patients with colorectal cancer (n = 102).
Most patients and healthy persons could make immediate decisions after seeing the diagrams (range: 88% – 100%). Patients (79%) chose the intensive-treatment option in the scenario with a clear survival benefit. In scenarios without survival benefit, all groups clearly preferred the milder treatment option (range: 78% - 90%). No preference was seen in the scenario depicting equally intense treatment options with different timing (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant) but without survival benefit.
Healthy persons’ and patients’ decisions using visual aids seem to be influenced by quality-of-life aspects rather than recurrence rates especially in situations without survival benefit. In the future visual aids may help to improve the management of patients with colorectal cancer.
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012, 62:10-29. CrossRef
- Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A: What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ 1999, 319:780-782. CrossRef
- Frosch DL, Kaplan RM: Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. Am J Prev Med 1999, 17:285-294. CrossRef
- Whelan T, Sawka C, Levine M, et al.: Helping Patients make informed choices: a randomized Trial of a Decision Aid for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Lymph node-negative Breast Cancer. J Nat C Inst 2003, 95:581-587. CrossRef
- Auvinen A, Hakama M, Ala-Opas M, et al.: A randomized trial of choice of treatment in prostate cancer: the effect of intervention on the treatment chosen. BJU Int 2004, 93:52-56. CrossRef
- Stacey D, Samant R, Bennet C: Decision making in oncology: a review of patient decision aids to support patient participation. CA Cancer J Clin 2008, 58:293-304. CrossRef
- Miller DP, Spangler JG, Case LD, et al.: Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: a randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy population. Am J Prev Med 2011, 40:608-615. CrossRef
- Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, et al.: Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, 10:CD001431.
- Leighl NB, Shepherd HL, Butow PN, et al.: Supporting treatment decision making in advanced cancer: a randomized trial of a decision aid for patients with advanced colorectal cancer considering chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29:2077-2084. CrossRef
- Kornmann M, Henne-Bruns D, Porzsolt F: Neoadjuvant treatment of rectal carcinoma: assessment of health care services by physicians and lay persons. J Clin Oncol 2008, 26:4866-4868. CrossRef
- Kornmann M, Porzsolt F, Henne-Bruns D: Vergleichende Bewertung von Gesundheitsleistungen durch Laien am Beispiel der Therapie des Rektumkarzinoms. Zentralbl Chir 2008, 133:1-8.
- Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Macdonald JS, et al.: Levamisole and fluorouracil for adjuvant therapy of resected colon carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1990, 322:352-358. CrossRef
- Moertel CG, Laurie JA, Fleming TR, et al.: Fluorouracil plus levamisole as effective adjuvant therapy after resection of stage 3 colon cancer carcinoma: a final report. Ann Intern Med 1995, 122:321-326.
- André T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L, et al.: Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004, 350:2343-2351. CrossRef
- Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al.: Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group: Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:638-646. CrossRef
- Marijnen CAM, van de Velde CJH, Putter H, et al.: Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:1847-1858. CrossRef
- Peeters KCMJ, van de Velde CJH, Leer JWH, et al.: Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients - A dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:6199-6206. CrossRef
- Peeters KCMJ, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group, et al.: The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with respectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 2007, 246:693-701. CrossRef
- Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, German Rectal Cancer Study Group, et al.: Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004, 351:1731-1740. CrossRef
- O’Conner H, Llewelyn-Thomas H, Stacey D: IPDAS (International Patient Decision Aids Standards) Collaboration Background Document. Presenting probabilities 2005. Ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS_Background.pdf
- Lipkus IM: Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Med Decis Making 2007, 27:696-713. CrossRef
- Peters E: Beyond comprehension: the role of numeracy in judgments and decisions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2012, 21:31-35. CrossRef
- Cheung YB, Wee HL, Thumboo J, et al.: Risk communication in clinical trials: a cognitive experiment and a survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2010, 10:55. CrossRef
- Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, et al.: International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006, 333:417. CrossRef
- Schmiegel W, Pox C, Reinacher-Schick A, et al.: S3 guidelines for colorectal carcinoma: results of an evidence-based consensus conference on February 6/7, 2004 and June 8/9, 2007 (for the topics IV, VI and VII). Z Gastroenterol 2010, 48:65-136. CrossRef
- Wachter C, Porzsolt F, Henne-Bruns D, Kornmann M: Bewertung von Gesundheitsleistungen durch Laien am Beispiel der multimodalen Therapie des Kolonkarzinoms. Viszeralmedizin 2010, 26:131-138. CrossRef
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/12/118/prepub
- Visual Aids for Multimodal Treatment Options to Support Decision Making of Patients with Colorectal Cancer
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Online Date
- October 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Visual aids
- Colorectal cancer
- Quality of life
- Side effects
- Shared decision-making
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
- 2. Study Group of Health Services Research at the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany