Evidence-based ethics? On evidence-based practice and the "empirical turn" from normative bioethics
- Maya J Goldenberg
- … show all 1 hide
The increase in empirical methods of research in bioethics over the last two decades is typically perceived as a welcomed broadening of the discipline, with increased integration of social and life scientists into the field and ethics consultants into the clinical setting, however it also represents a loss of confidence in the typical normative and analytic methods of bioethics.
The recent incipiency of "Evidence-Based Ethics" attests to this phenomenon and should be rejected as a solution to the current ambivalence toward the normative resolution of moral problems in a pluralistic society. While "evidence-based" is typically read in medicine and other life and social sciences as the empirically-adequate standard of reasonable practice and a means for increasing certainty, I propose that the evidence-based movement in fact gains consensus by displacing normative discourse with aggregate or statistically-derived empirical evidence as the "bottom line". Therefore, along with wavering on the fact/value distinction, evidence-based ethics threatens bioethics' normative mandate. The appeal of the evidence-based approach is that it offers a means of negotiating the demands of moral pluralism. Rather than appealing to explicit values that are likely not shared by all, "the evidence" is proposed to adjudicate between competing claims. Quantified measures are notably more "neutral" and democratic than liberal markers like "species normal functioning". Yet the positivist notion that claims stand or fall in light of the evidence is untenable; furthermore, the legacy of positivism entails the quieting of empirically non-verifiable (or at least non-falsifiable) considerations like moral claims and judgments. As a result, evidence-based ethics proposes to operate with the implicit normativity that accompanies the production and presentation of all biomedical and scientific facts unchecked.
The "empirical turn" in bioethics signals a need for reconsideration of the methods used for moral evaluation and resolution, however the options should not include obscuring normative content by seemingly neutral technical measure.
- Borry P, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K: The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics. Bioethics 2005, 19:49–71. CrossRef
- Sugarman J, Faden R, Weinstein J: A decade of empirical research in bioethics. Methods in Medical Ethics (Edited by: Sugarman J, Sulmasy DR). Washington: Georgetown University Press 2001, 19–33.
- Hoffmaster B: Can ethnography save the life of medical ethics? Soc Sci Med 1992, 35:1421–1431. CrossRef
- Sugarman J: The future of empirical research in bioethics. J Law Med Ethics 2004, 32:226–231. CrossRef
- Nelson JL: Moral teachings from unexpected quarters. Hastings Cent Rep 2000, 30:12–17.
- The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group: Evidence-based medicine. JAMA 1992, 268:2420–2425. CrossRef
- Davidoff F, Haynes B, Sackett D, Smith R: Evidence based medicine. BMJ 1995, 310:1085–1086.
- Sackett D, Rosenberg W, Gray JAM, Haynes B, Richardson WS: Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. Br Med J 1996, 312:71–72.
- Sackett DL: A science for the art of consensus. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997, 89:1003–1005. CrossRef
- Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg WMC, Haynes RB: Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM London: Chirchill Livingstone 1997.
- Sackett DL, Hanes RB: On the need for evidence-based medicine. Evidence-Based Medicine 1995, 1:5–6.
- Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations[http://cebm.net.levels-of-evidence.asp]Oxford University
- Canadian Medical Association: Canadian task force on the periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J 1994., 150:
- Zussman R: The contributions of sociology to medical ethics. Hastings Cent Rep 2000, 30:7–11.
- Ashcroft RE: Teaching patient centred ethics. Med Health Care Philos 2000, 3:287–295. CrossRef
- Hedgecoe A: For example, Critical bioethics: Beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics 2004, 18:120–143. CrossRef
- Major-Kincade T, Tyson J, Kennedy K: Training pediatric house staff in evidence-based ethics: An explanatory controlled trial. J Perinatology 2001, 21:161–166. CrossRef
- Sugarman J: Determining the appropriateness of including children in clinical research: How thick is the ice? JAMA 2004, 291:494–496. CrossRef
- Jansen R: Evidence-based ethics and the regulation of reproduction. Hum Reprod 1997, 12:2068–2075. CrossRef
- This is not to say, however, that this "informational" model, where empirical data informs moral deliberation, is without certain difficulties. While the failings of the qualitative tendencies in empirical ethics are beyond the scope of this paper, I refer readers to Richard Ashcroft's thoughtful analysis of how social research evidence plays a part in the construction of the social order. See Ashcroft RE: Constructing empirical bioethics: Foucauldian reflections on the empirical turn in bioethics research Health Care Anal 2003, 11:3–13.
- An exhaustive account of the difficulties with this division of labour along "fact" and "value" or "empirical" and "normative" lines is beyond the scope of this paper
- Tyson J: Evidence-based ethics and the care of premature infants. Future Child 1995, 161–166.
- Gray JAM: Evidence-Based Health Care New York: Churchill Livingstone 1997.
- Despite defenders of evidence-based medicine's considerable attempts to deflect accusations of offering "cook book medicine", that is, treating patients strictly according to a formula or algorithm derived from a research study, even Brian Haynes, one of the movement's founders, admits that much of the programmatic literature regarding evidence-based medicine does not "clearly emphasise that evidence from research can be no more than one component of any clinical decision" Op cit 25
- Haynes RB: What kind of evidence is it that evidence-based medicine advocates want health care providers and consumers to pay attention to? BMC Health Services Research 2002, 2:3. CrossRef
- Kerridge I, Lowe M, Henry D: Ethics and evidence based medicine. British Medical Journal 1998, 316:1151–1153.
- Molewijk AC, Stiggelbout AM, Otten W, Dupuis HM, Kievit J: Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: A plea for integrated empirical ethics research. Health Care Anal 2003, 11:69–92. CrossRef
- Thanks to an audience member at a presentation of an earlier draft of this paper at the Canadian Society for the Study of Practical Ethics for this suggestion
- Goldenberg MJ: On evidence and evidence-based medicine: Lessons from the philosophy of science. Soc Sci Med, in press.
- Quine WVO: Word and Object Cambridge: MIT Press 1960.
- Longino H: Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry Princeton: Princeton University Press 1990.
- Nelson LH: Epistemological communities. Feminist Epistemologies (Edited by: Alcoff L, Potter E). New York: Routledge 1993, 121–160.
- Denny K: Evidence-based medicine and medical authority. J Med Humanities 1999, 20:247–263. CrossRef
- Galison P: The context of disunity. The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power (Edited by: Galison P, Stump D). Stanford: Stanford University Press 1996, 1–33.
- Belkin G: The technocratic wish: Making sense and finding power in the "managed" medical marketplace. J Health Politics Policy Law 1997, 22:509–532.
- Frankford DM: Scientism and economism: Regulating health care. J Health Politics Policy Law 1994, 19:773–799. CrossRef
- Belkin G: Shifting the focus: The historical meaning of managed care and the search for ethics in mental health. Rationing Sanity: Ethical Issues in Managed Mental Health Care (Edited by: Nelson JL). Washington: Georgetown University Press 2003, 9–27.
- Tanenbaum SJ: Getting from there to here: Evidentiary quandaries of the US outcomes movement. J Eval Clin Prac 1995, 1:97–103. CrossRef
- Habermas J: Technology and science as ideology. Jurgen Habermas on Society and Politics: A Reader (Edited by: Seidman S). Boston: Beacon Press 1989, 237–265.
- Upshur REG, VanDenKerkhof EG, Goel V: Meaning and measurement: An inclusive model of evidence in health care. J Eval Clin Prac 2001, 7:91–96. CrossRef
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/6/11/prepub
- Evidence-based ethics? On evidence-based practice and the "empirical turn" from normative bioethics
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
BMC Medical Ethics
- Online Date
- November 2005
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University, 503 South Kedzie Hall, East Lansing, Michigan, USA