The unique ethical challenges of conducting research in the rehabilitation medicine population
- Jeff Blackmer
- … show all 1 hide
The broad topic of research ethics is one which has been relatively well-investigated and discussed. Unique ethical issues have been identified for such populations as pediatrics, where the issues of consent and assent have received much attention, and obstetrics, with concerns such as the potential for research to cause harm to the fetus. However, little has been written about ethical concerns which are relatively unique to the population of patients seen by the practitioner of rehabilitation medicine.
This paper reviews unique ethical concerns in conducting research in this population, including decision-making capacity, communication, the potential for subject overuse, the timing of recruitment, hope for a cure and therapeutic misconception and the nature of the health care provider-research subject relationship.
Researchers in the area of rehabilitation medicine should be aware of some of the unique ethical challenges posed by this patient population and should take steps to address any potential concerns in order to optimize subject safety and ensure that studies meet current ethical guidelines and standards.
- Harrison C, Kenny NP, Sidarous M, Rowell M: Involving children in medical decisions. CMAJ 1997, 156:825–828.
- Annas GJ: Protecting the liberty of pregnant patients. NEJM 1987, 316:1213–14. CrossRef
- Kolder VEB, Gallagher J, Parsons MT: Court-ordered obstetrical interventions. NEJM 1987, 316:1192–1196. CrossRef
- Lippman A: Prenatal diagnosis: Reproductive choice? Reproductive control? In: The future of human reproduction (Edited by: Overall C). Toronto, The Women's Press 1989, 182–194.
- Burgess MM, Laberge CM, Knoppers BM: Ethics and genetics in medicine. CMAJ 1998, 158:1309–1313.
- Etchells E, Sharpe G, Walsh P, Williams JR, Singer PA: Consent. CMAJ 1996, 155:177–180.
- Roth EJ, Harvey RL: Rehabilitation of stroke syndromes. In: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2 Edition (Edited by: Braddom RL). Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co 2000, 1118.
- Filley CM, Heaton RK, Nelson LM, Burks JS, Franklin GM: A comparison of dementia in Alzheimer's disease and multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 1989, 46:157–161.
- Mortimer JA, Pirozzolo FJ, Hansch EC, Webster DD: Relationship of motor symptoms to intellectual deficits in Parkinson's disease. Neurology 1982, 32:133–137.
- DeVivo MJ, Fine PR, Maetz HM, Stover SL: Prevalence of spinal cord injury: re-estimation employing life table techniques. Arch Neurol 1980, 37:707–8.
- Wolf PA, Kannez WB, Venter J: Current status of risk factors for stroke. Neurol Clin 1983, 1:317–343.
- Shapiro RT: Medications used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 1999, 10:437–446.
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/4/2/prepub
- The unique ethical challenges of conducting research in the rehabilitation medicine population
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
BMC Medical Ethics
- Online Date
- June 2003
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- rehabilitation medicine
- Jeff Blackmer (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa The Rehabilitation Centre, 505 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M2, Canada