Appropriate use of indwelling urethra catheters in hospitalized patients: results of a multicentre prevalence study
Although indwelling urethra catheterization is a medical intervention with well-defined risks, studies show that approximately 14–38% of the indwelling urethra catheters (IUCs) are placed without a specific medical indication. In this paper we describe the prevalence of IUCs, including their inappropriate use in the Netherlands. We also determine factors associated with inappropriate use of IUCs in hospitalized patients.
In 28 Dutch hospitals, prevalence surveys were performed biannually in 2009 and 2010 within the PREZIES-network. All patients admitted to a participating hospital and who had an IUC in place at the day of the survey were included. Pre-determined criteria were used to categorize the indication for catheterization as appropriate or inappropriate.
A total of 14,252 patients was included and 3020 (21.2%) of them had an IUC (range hospitals 13.4-27.3). Initial catheter placement was inappropriate in 5.2% of patients and 7.5% patients had an inappropriate indication at the day of the survey. In multivariate analyses inappropriate catheter use at the time of placement was associated with female sex, older age, admission on a non-intensive care ward, and not having had surgery. Inappropriate catheter use at the time of survey showed comparable associated factors.
Although lower than in many other countries, inappropriate use of IUC is present in Dutch hospitals. To reduce the inappropriate use of IUCs, recommended components of care (bundle for UTI), including daily revision and registration of the indication for catheterization, should be introduced for all patients with an IUC. Additionally, an education and awareness campaign about appropriate indications for IUC should be available.
- Holroyd-Leduc, JM, Sen, S, Bertenthal, D, Sands, LP, Palmer, RM, Kresevic, DM, Covinsky, KE, Seth Landefeld, C (2007) The relationship of indwelling urinary catheters to death, length of hospital stay, functional decline, and nursing home admission in hospitalized older medical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 55: pp. 227-33 CrossRef
- Apisarnthanarak, A, Rutjanawech, S, Wichansawakun, S, Ratanabunjerdkul, H, Patthranitima, P, Thongphubeth, K, Suwannakin, A, Warren, DK, Fraser, VJ (2007) Initial inappropriate urinary catheters use in a tertiary-care center: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Am J Infect Control 35: pp. 594-9 CrossRef
- Jain, P, Parada, JP, David, A, Smith, LG (1995) Overuse of the indwelling urinary tract catheter in hospitalized medical patients. Arch Intern Med 155: pp. 1425-9 CrossRef
- Munasinghe, RL, Yazdani, H, Siddique, M, Hafeez, W (2001) Appropriateness of use of indwelling urinary catheters in patients admitted to the medical service. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 22: pp. 647-9 CrossRef
- Saint, S, Lipsky, BA, Baker, PD, McDonald, LL, Ossenkop, K (1999) Urinary catheters: what type do men and their nurses prefer?. J Am Geriatr Soc 47: pp. 1453-7
- Emori, TG, Banerjee, SN, Culver, DH, Gaynes, RP, Horan, TC, Edwards, JR, Jarvis, WR, Tolson, JS, Henderson, TS, Martone, WJ (1991) Nosocomial infections in elderly patients in the United States, 1986–1990. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 91: pp. 289S-93S CrossRef
- Stamm, W (1991) Catheter-associated urinary tract infections, epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention. Am J Med 91: pp. 6
- Gokula, RR, Hickner, JA, Smith, MA (2004) Inappropriate use of urinary catheters in elderly patients at a midwestern community teaching hospital. Am J Infect Control 32: pp. 196-9 CrossRef
- Tambyah, PA, Knasinski, V, Maki, DG (2002) The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 23: pp. 27-31 CrossRef
- Green, MS, Rubinstein, E, Amit, P (1982) Estimating the effects of nosocomial infections on the length of hospitalization. J Infect Dis 145: pp. 667-72 CrossRef
- Saint, S (2000) Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria. Am J Infect Control 28: pp. 68-75 CrossRef
- Prevention of infections as a result of urinary catheterization via the urethra. The Netherlands, Leiden
- Gould CU, CA, Agarwal, R, Kuntz, G, Pegues, D (2009) Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009.
- Prevent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Warren, JW (2001) Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 17: pp. 299-303 CrossRef
- Nicolle, LE (2005) Catheter-related urinary tract infection. Drugs Aging 22: pp. 627-39 CrossRef
- Tambyah, PA, Maki, DG (2000) Catheter-associated urinary tract infection is rarely symptomatic: a prospective study of 1,497 catheterized patients. Arch Intern Med 160: pp. 678-82 CrossRef
- Saint, S, Wiese, J, Amory, JK, Bernstein, ML, Patel, UD, Zemencuk, JK, Bernstein, SJ, Lipsky, BA, Hofer, TP (2000) Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters?. Am J Med 109: pp. 476-80 CrossRef
- van den Broek, PJ, Wille, JC, van Benthem, BHB, Perenboom, RJM, van den Akker-van Marle, ME, Niël-Weise, BS (2011) Urethral catheters: can we reduce use?. BMC Urology 11: pp. 10 CrossRef
- Holroyd-Leduc, JM, Sands, LP, Counsell, SR, Palmer, RM, Kresevic, DM, Landefeld, CS (2005) Risk factors for indwelling urinary catheterization among older hospitalized patient without a specific medical indication for catheterization. Journal of Patient Safety 1: pp. 201-207 CrossRef
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2490/12/25/prepub
- Appropriate use of indwelling urethra catheters in hospitalized patients: results of a multicentre prevalence study
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
- Online Date
- September 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Hospitalized patients
- Inappropriate use
- Prevalence study
- Urethra catheters.
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO box 1 (postbak 75), 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- 2. Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands