August 2012, 12:124,
Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Date: 23 Aug 2012
Spatial clusters of suicide in the municipality of São Paulo 1996–2005: an ecological study
In a classical study, Durkheim mapped suicide rates, wealth, and low family density and realized that they clustered in northern France. Assessing others variables, such as religious society, he constructed a framework for the analysis of the suicide, which still allows international comparisons using the same basic methodology. The present study aims to identify possible significantly clusters of suicide in the city of São Paulo, and then, verify their statistical associations with socio-economic and cultural characteristics.
A spatial scan statistical test was performed to analyze the geographical pattern of suicide deaths of residents in the city of São Paulo by Administrative District, from 1996 to 2005. Relative risks and high and/or low clusters were calculated accounting for gender and age as co-variates, were analyzed using spatial scan statistics to identify geographical patterns. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations with socioeconomic variables, considering, the spatial cluster of high suicide rates as the response variable. Drawing from Durkheim’s original work, current World Health Organization (WHO) reports and recent reviews, the following independent variables were considered: marital status, income, education, religion, and migration.
The mean suicide rate was 4.1/100,000 inhabitant-years. Against this baseline, two clusters were identified: the first, of increased risk (RR = 1.66), comprising 18 districts in the central region; the second, of decreased risk (RR = 0.78), including 14 districts in the southern region. The downtown area toward the southwestern region of the city displayed the highest risk for suicide, and though the overall risk may be considered low, the rate climbs up to an intermediate level in this region. One logistic regression analysis contrasted the risk cluster (18 districts) against the other remaining 78 districts, testing the effects of socioeconomic-cultural variables. The following categories of proportion of persons within the clusters were identified as risk factors: singles (OR = 2.36), migrants (OR = 1.50), Catholics (OR = 1.37) and higher income (OR = 1.06). In a second logistic model, likewise conceived, the following categories of proportion of persons were identified as protective factors: married (OR = 0.49) and Evangelical (OR = 0.60).
This risk/ protection profile is in accordance with the interpretation that, as a social phenomenon, suicide is related to social isolation. Thus, the classical framework put forward by Durkheim seems to still hold, even though its categorical expression requires re-interpretation.
World Health Organization: World report on violence and health. In Self-directed violence. Geneva; 2002. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/global_campaign/en/chap7.pdf
World Health Organization: Suicide Prevention (SUPRE). Geneva; 2002. http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suicideprevent/en/
Bertolote JM, Fleischmann A: A global perspective in the epidemiology of suicide. Suicidologi 2002, 7:6–8.
Lovisi GM, Santos SA, Legay L, Abelha L, Valencia E: Epidemiological analysis of suicide in Brazil from 1980 to 2006. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2009, 31:86–94.CrossRef
Morselli EA: Suicide: an essay on comparative moral statistics. New York: Appleton; 1882.
Durkheim E: Suicide. London: Routledge; 1897. 1951
Baller RD, Richardson KK: Social integration, imitation, and the geographic patterning of suicide. Am Sociol Rev 2002, 67:873–888.CrossRef
Lester D, Charles C Thomas: Suicide from a sociological perspective. Springfield: Charles C Thomas; 1989.
Iga M: The Thorn in the Chrysanthemum: Suicide and Economic Success in Modern Japan. Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1986.
Gunnel D, Wheeler B, Chang S-S, Thomas B, Sterne JAC, Dorling D: Changes in the geography of suicide in young men: England and Wales 1981–2005. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012, 66:536–543.CrossRef
Halbwachs M: The causes of suicide. New York: Free Press; 1978.
Baudelot C, Establet R: Suicide: The hidden side of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2008.
Gunnell DJ, Peters TJ, Kammerling RM, Brooks J: Relation between parasuicide, suicide, psychiatric admissions, and socioeconomic deprivation. Br Med J 1995, 311:226–230.CrossRef
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística: Síntese de indicadores sociais confirma as desigualdades da sociedade brasileira. 2002.
Sposati A: Mapa de exclusão/inclusão social na cidade de São Paulo – Brasil - 2000. São Paulo: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo; 2000.
IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística): Brasil tem 183,9 milhões de habitantes segundo Contagem da População do IBGE. 2007. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/noticia_visualiza.php?id_noticia=1028&id_pagina=1
Kulldorff M: Information Management Services Inc: SaTScanTM v7.0: Software for the spatial and space-time scan statistics. 2007.
Pan American Health Organization: World Health Organization, Ministério da Saúde do Brasil, Universidade Estadual de Campinas: Prevenção do suicídio: Manual dirigido a profissionais das equipes de saúde mental. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2006.
Stack S: Suicide: a 15-year review of the sociological literature Part II: modernization and social integration perspectives. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2000, 30:163–176.PubMed
Diekstra RFW, Gulbinat W: The epidemiology of suicidal behaviour: a review of three continents. World Health Stat Q 1993, 46:52–68.PubMed
Bando DH, Brunoni AR, Fernandes TG, Benseñor IM, Lotufo PA: Suicide rates and trends in São Paulo, Brazil according to gender, age and demographic aspects: a joinpoint regression analysis. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2012, 34:237–244.
Stack S: Gender, marriage, and suicide acceptability: a comparative approach. Sex Roles 1998, 38:501–520.CrossRef
Kapusta ND, Gernot S: Suicides of men in Austria: an epidemiological analysis over a 30-year period. J Of Men’s Health 2004, 1:197–202.
Yamasaki A, Araki S, Sakai R, Yokoyama K, Voorhees AS: Suicide mortality of young, middle-aged and elderly males and females in Japan for the years 1953–96: time series analysis for the effects of unemployment, female labour force, young and aged population, primary industry and population density. Ind Health 2008, 46:541–549.PubMedCrossRef
Jung H, Matei DB, Hecser L: Biostatistical study of suicide features in Mures County (Romania). Leg Med 2009, 11:S95-S97.CrossRef
Almeida R: Religião na metrópole paulista. Braz J CiencSociais 2004, 56:15–27.
Camurça PA: A realidade das religiões no Brasil no Censo do IBGE-2000. In As religiões no Brasil. Edited by: Teixeira F, Menezes R. Petrópolis: Vozes;
Prandi R, Góes RCT, Justo JA: A renovação carismática e o pentecostalismo: proximidade e diferença. Edited by: Prandi R. São Paulo: Edusp; 1998:123–142.
Taylor R, Page A, Morrell S, Harrison J, Carter G: Mental health and socio-economic variations in Australian suicide. Soc Sci &Med 2005, 61:1551–1559.CrossRef
Maki N, Martikainen PT: The role of socioeconomic indicators on non-alcohol and alcohol-associated suicide mortality among women in Finland. A register-based follow-up study of 12 million person-years. Soc Sciand Med 2009, 68:2161–2169.CrossRef
Martiello MA, Giacchi MV: Ecological study of isolation and suicide in Tuscany (Italy). Psychiatry Res 2012. in press
Paugam S: Desqualificação social – ensaio sobre a nova pobreza. São Paulo: Educ & Cortez; 2003.
Castel R: Metamorfoses da questão social. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes; 1998.
- Spatial clusters of suicide in the municipality of São Paulo 1996–2005: an ecological study
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
- Online Date
- August 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University Hospital, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
- 2. Department of Public Health, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health, Recife, Brazil
- 3. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- 4. Department of Geography, School of Philosophy, Literature and Human Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil