Early childhood development when second-trimester ultrasound dating disagrees with last menstrual period: a prospective cohort study
When an ultrasound-based estimate of gestational age (GA) is less (greater) than an estimate based on a definite last menstrual period, the fetus may grow slower (faster) than average. While the association between these discrepancies in GA estimates and adverse perinatal outcomes has been examined extensively, there is scant evidence about long-term effects, such as child neurodevelopment.
Using data from a prospective cohort study titled, NICHD Study of Successive Small-for-Gestational Age Births, we examined if GA discrepancies in early second trimester of pregnancy (17 weeks’ gestation) are associated with: (1) impaired motor and mental function at 13 months (measured using Bayley Scales of Infant Development (Bayley)), and (2) impaired cognitive development at five years (assessed by Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence – Revised Intelligence Quotient (WPPSI-R)) in the infant. The study population consisted of 572 (30% of the overall sample of 1,945) women who presented for prenatal care in Norway and Sweden between 1986 and 1988.
Our results showed that GA discrepancies in early second trimester are significantly associated with birthweight. We found no significant relationship, however, with the Bayley development scores at 13 months and with the WPPSI-R IQ measures at five years.
GA discrepancies at 17 weeks’ gestation are not associated child neurodevelopment. These discrepancies do, however, relate to birthweights, providing a basis for detecting fetal growth patterns early in the second trimester of pregnancy. Our study, however, was unable to evaluate the impact of first-trimester discrepancies on impaired neurodevelopment in the infant.
- Kramer MS, McLean FH, Boyd ME, Usher RH: The validity of gestational age estimation by menstrual dating in term, preterm, and postterm gestations. JAMA 1988, 260:3306–3308. CrossRef
- Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Gardosi J: Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996, 174:278–281. CrossRef
- Goldenberg RL, Davis RO, Cutter GR, Hoffman HJ, Brumfield CG, Foster JM: Prematurity, postdates, and growth retardation: the influence of use of ultrasonography on reported gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989, 160:462–470.
- Høgberg U, Larsson N: Early dating by ultrasound and perinatal outcome. A cohort study. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 1997, 76:907–912. CrossRef
- Yang H, Kramer MS, Platt RW, et al.: How does early ultrasound scan estimation of gestational age lead to higher rates of preterm birth? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 186:433–437. CrossRef
- Berg AT: Menstrual cycle length and the calculation of gestational age. Am J Epidemiol 1991, 133:585–589.
- Gardosi J, Vanner T, Francis A: Gestational age and induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997, 104:792–797. CrossRef
- Nguyen T, Larsen T, Engholm G, Møller H: A discrepancy between gestational age estimated by last menstrual period and biparietal diameter may indicate an increased risk of fetal death and adverse pregnancy outcome. BJOG 2000, 107:1122–1129. CrossRef
- Larsen T, Nguyen TH, Greisen G, Engholm G, Moller H: Does a discrepancy between gestational age determined by biparietal diameter and last menstrual period sometimes signify early intrauterine growth retardation? BJOG 2000, 107:238–244. CrossRef
- Nakling J, Backe B: Adverse obstetric outcome in fetuses that are smaller than expected at second trimester routine ultrasound examination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002, 81:846–851. CrossRef
- Kallen K: Increased risk of perinatal/neonatal death in infants who were smaller than expected at ultrasound fetometry in early pregnancy. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2004, 24:30–34. CrossRef
- Morin I, Morin L, Zhang X, Platt RW, Blondel B, Bréart G, Usher R, Kramer MS: Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates. BJOG 2005, 112:145–152. CrossRef
- Roth S, Chang TC, Robson S, Spencer JAD, Wyatt JS, Stewart AL: The neurodevelopmental outcome of term infants with different intrauterine growth characteristics. Early Human Development 1999, 55:39–50. CrossRef
- Fattal-Valevski A, Leitner Y, Kutai M, et al.: Neurodevelopmental outcome in children with intrauterine growth retardation: a 3-year follow-up. Journal of child neurology 1999, 14:724–727. CrossRef
- Leitner Y, Fattal-Valevski A, Geva R, et al.: Neurodevelopmental outcome of children with intrauterine growth retardation: a longitudinal, 10-year prospective study. Journal of child neurology 2007, 22:580–587. CrossRef
- Leonard H, Nassar N, Bourke J, et al.: Relation between intrauterine growth and subsequent intellectual disability in a ten-year population cohort of children in western Australia. Am J Epidemiol 2007, 167:103–111. CrossRef
- Hutton JL, Pharoah PO, Cooke RW, Stevenson RC: Differential effects of preterm birth and small gestational age on cognitive and motor development. Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 1997, 76:F75-F81. CrossRef
- Sommerfelt K, Andersson HW, Sonnander K, et al.: Cognitive development of term small for gestational age children at five years of age. Arch Dis Child 2000, 83:25–30. CrossRef
- Gortner L, van Husen M, Thyen U, Gembruch U, Friedrich HJ, Landmann E: Outcome in preterm small for gestational age infants compared to appropriate for gestational age preterms at the age of 2 years: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003,110(Suppl 1):S93-S97. CrossRef
- Bakketeig LS, Jacobsen G, Hoffman HJ, et al.: Pre-pregnancy risk factors of small-for-gestational age births among parous women in Scandinavia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993, 72:273–279. CrossRef
- Bayley N: Bayley scales of infant development. New York: The Psychological Corporation; 1969.
- Deter RL, Karmel BZ, Gardner JM, Flory MJ: Predicting 2nd year Bayley raw scores in normal infants: Individualized assessment of early developmental trajectories using Rossavik modeling. Infant Behavior and Development 2001, 24:57–82. CrossRef
- Wechsle D The Psychological Corporation; 1989.
- Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK: Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology 1984, 152:497–501.
- Smith GC, Smith MF, McNay MB, Fleming JE: First-trimester growth and the risk of low birth weight. N Engl J Med 1998, 339:1817–1822. CrossRef
- Lundgren EM, Cnattingius S, Jonsson B, Tuvemo T: Intellectual and psychological performance in males born small for gestational age with and without catch-up growth. Pediatr Res 2001, 50:91–96. CrossRef
- Latal-Hajnal B, von Siebenthal K, Kovari H, Bucher HU, Largo RH: Postnatal growth in VLBW infants: significant association with neurodevelopmental outcome. J Pediatr 2003, 143:163–170.
- Harvey D, Prince J, Bunton J, Parkinson C, Campbell S: Abilities of children who were small-for-gestational-age babies. Pediatrics 1982, 69:296–300.
- Ounsted MK, Moar VA, Scott A: Large-for-dates babies at the age of four years: health, handicap and developmental status. Early Human Development 1983, 9:9–19. CrossRef
- Mook-Kanamori DO, Steegers EA, Eilers PH, Raat H, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW: Risk factors and outcomes associated with first-trimester fetal growth restriction. JAMA 2010, 303:527–534. CrossRef
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/12/32/prepub
- Early childhood development when second-trimester ultrasound dating disagrees with last menstrual period: a prospective cohort study
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Online Date
- April 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Gestational age discrepancy
- Childhood development
- Cognitive functioning
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 7B03G, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA
- 2. Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 7B03G, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA
- 3. MOE and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children’s Environmental Health, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1665 Kong Jiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, P R China