The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010
Governmental funding support is seen as a prerequisite for the growth of research in general practice. Several funding programs in the amount of € 13.2 Mio were introduced in Germany from 2002 to February 2012. We aim to provide an overview of publications reporting original data and systematic reviews from German academic family medicine published between 2000 and 2010.
Publications were identified by searching the database Scopus and screening publication lists of family medicine divisions or institutes. Papers had to report original primary research studies or systematic reviews; at least one of the authors had to be affiliated to a German academic family medicine division or institute.
794 articles were included. The number of publications increased steadily starting from 107 in the period from 2000 to 2003, to 273 from 2004 to 2007, and finally to 414 from 2008 to 2010. Less than 25% were published in English in the first period. This proportion increased to 60.6% from 2008 to 2010. Articles published in a journal without impact factor decreased from 59.8% to 31.9%. Nevertheless, even in the most recent period only 31.6% of all articles were published in a journal with an impact factor above 2. The median impact factor increased from 0 in the first period to 1.2 in the last.
The output of original research publications from academic research divisions and institutes for general practice in Germany greatly increased during the last decade. However, professionalism of German primary care research still needs to be developed.
- Glanville J, Kendrick T, McNally R, Campbell J, Hobbs FD: Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis. BMJ 2011, 342:d1028. CrossRef
- Hummers-Pradier E: 40 Years DEGAM: research in general practice in Germany - development and current situation. Z Allg Med 2006, 82:409–414. CrossRef
- Starfield B: Is primary care essential? Lancet 1994, 344:1129–1133. CrossRef
- Starfield B: Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs. New York, NY: Services and Technology; 1998.
- Kruschinski C, Lange M, Lionis C, Van WC, Hummers-Pradier E: Themes and methods of research presented at European General Practice Research Network conferences. Fam Pract 2010, 27:459–467. CrossRef
- van Weel C, Rosser WW: Improving health care globally: a critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity. Ann Fam Med 2004,2(Suppl 2):S5-S16. CrossRef
- 2012. http://leitlinien.degam.de/. 2012.
- Kopp IB: From clinical practice guidelines towards quality assurance. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2011, 54:160–165. CrossRef
- 2012. http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de.
- European General Practitioner Research Network (EGPRN): Research Agenda 2009. 2012. http://www.egprn.org/web/research-agenda
- Koch K, Miksch A, Schurmann C, Joos S, Sawicki PT: The German health care system in international comparison: the primary care physicians' perspective. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011, 108:255–261.
- http://stats.oecd.org/INdex.aspx?userontext=sourceoecd; 2012. last access 16/05/2012.
- Borgers D: Germany's academic family medicine reflected in its publications (1998–2007). Z Allg Med 2012, 84:44–50. CrossRef
- Borgers D: The publications of Germany's academic family medicine departments in 2008. Z Allg Med 2012, 86:407–411.
- Borgers D: The publications of Germany's academic family medicine departments in 2009. Z Allg Med 2012, 87:187–190.
- Seglen PO: Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997, 314:498–502. CrossRef
- Smith R: Commentary: the power of the unrelenting impact factor–is it a force for good or harm? Int J Epidemiol 2006, 35:1129–1130. CrossRef
- van Weel C: The impact of research in primary care and family medicine: the Thomson Reuters Web of Science Subject Category 'Primary Health Care'. Fam Pract 2011, 28:239–240. CrossRef
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/13/58/prepub
- The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
BMC Family Practice
- Online Date
- June 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Research articles
- Primary care
- General practice
- Academic performance
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Antonius Schneider Institute of General Practice, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München Orleansstrasse 47, 81667, Munich, Germany