Qualitative evaluation of a local coronary heart disease treatment pathway: practical implications and theoretical framework
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a common medical problem in general practice. Due to its chronic character, shared care of the patient between general practitioner (GP) and cardiologist (C) is required. In order to improve the cooperation between both medical specialists for patients with CHD, a local treatment pathway was developed. The objective of this study was first to evaluate GPs’ opinions regarding the pathway and its practical implications, and secondly to suggest a theoretical framework of the findings by feeding the identified key factors influencing the pathway implementation into a multi-dimensional model.
The evaluation of the pathway was conducted in a qualitative design on a sample of 12 pathway developers (8 GPs and 4 cardiologists) and 4 pathway users (GPs). Face-to face interviews, which were aligned with previously conducted studies of the department and assumptions of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), were performed following a semi-structured interview guideline. These were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed according to the standards of qualitative content analysis.
We identified 10 frequently mentioned key factors having an impact on the implementation success of the CHD treatment pathway. We thereby differentiated between pathway related (pathway content, effort, individual flexibility, ownership), behaviour related (previous behaviour, support), interaction related (patient, shared care/colleagues), and system related factors (context, health care system). The overall evaluation of the CHD pathway was positive, but did not automatically lead to a change of clinical behaviour as some GPs felt to have already acted as the pathway recommends.
By providing an account of our experience creating and implementing an intersectoral care pathway for CHD, this study contributes to our knowledge of factors that may influence physicians’ decisions regarding the use of a local treatment pathway. An improved adaptation of the pathway in daily practice might be best achieved by a combined implementation strategy addressing internal and external factors. A simple, direct adaptation regards the design of the pathway material (e.g. layout, PC version), or the embedding of the pathway in another programme, like a Disease Management Programme (DMP). In addition to these practical implications, we propose a theoretical framework to understand the key factors’ influence on the pathway implementation, with the identified factors along the microlevel (pathway related factors), the mesolevel (interaction related factors), and system- related factors along the macrolevel.
- Levi F, Lucchini F, Negri E, La Vecchia C: Trends in mortality from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in Europe and other areas of the world. Heart 2002, 88:119–124. CrossRef
- Kesteloot H, Sans S, Kromhout D: Dynamics of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in Western and Eastern Europe between 1970 and 2000. Eur Heart J 2006, 27:107–113. CrossRef
- Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ: Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 2006, 367:1747–1757. CrossRef
- Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, et al.: Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011, 123:e18-e209. CrossRef
- Lange C, Ziese T: Daten und Fakten: Ergebnisse der Studie "Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell 2009". Berlin: Robert Koch Institut; 2010.
- Löwel H: Koronare Herzkrankheit und akuter Myokardinfarkt. Berlin: Robert-Koch-Institut; 2006.
- Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R: Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003, 327:1219–1221. CrossRef
- Rosemann T, Wensing M, Rueter G, Szecsenyi J: Referrals from general practice to consultants in Germany: if the GP is the initiator, patients' experiences are more positive. BMC Health Serv Res 2006, 6:5. CrossRef
- Wagner EH: The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ 2000, 320:569–572. CrossRef
- Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Westert GP: Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on quality of care: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 2009, 18:385–392. CrossRef
- Ho PM, Magid DJ, Shetterly SM, Olson KL, Maddox TM, Peterson PN, et al.: Medication nonadherence is associated with a broad range of adverse outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2008, 155:772–779. CrossRef
- Grimshaw JM, Russell IT: Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993, 342:1317–1322. CrossRef
- Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Ramsay C, Fraser C, et al.: Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966–1998. J Gen Intern Med 2006,21(Suppl 2):S14-S20.
- Perkins MB, Jensen PS, Jaccard J, Gollwitzer P, Oettingen G, Pappadopulos E, et al.: Applying theory-driven approaches to understanding and modifying clinicians' behavior: what do we know? Psychiatr Serv 2007, 58:342–348. CrossRef
- Worrall G, Chaulk P, Freake D: The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1997, 156:1705–1712.
- Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, et al.: Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999, 282:1458–1465. CrossRef
- Grol R: Changing physicians' competence and performance: finding the balance between the individual and the organization. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002, 22:244–251. CrossRef
- Lugtenberg M, Zegers-van Schaick JM, Westert GP, Burgers JS: Why don't physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners. Implement Sci 2009, 4:54. CrossRef
- Harrison MB, Legare F, Graham ID, Fervers B: Adapting clinical practice guidelines to local context and assessing barriers to their use. CMAJ 2010, 182:E78-E84. CrossRef
- Kinsman L, Rotter T, James E, Snow P, Willis J: What is a clinical pathway? Development of a definition to inform the debate. BMC Med 2010, 8:31. CrossRef
- Vanhaecht K, Bollman M, Bower K, Gallagher C, Gardini A: Prevalence and use of clinical pathways in 23 countries - an international survey by the European Pathway Association. J Integr Care Pathw 2006, 10:28–34.
- Ovretveit J: The future for care pathways. J Integr Care Pathw 2010, 14:76–78. CrossRef
- Wood DA, Kotseva K, Connolly S, Jennings C, Mead A, Jones J, et al.: Nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary, family-based cardiovascular disease prevention programme (EUROACTION) for patients with coronary heart disease and asymptomatic individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a paired, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008, 371:1999–2012. CrossRef
- Lelgemann M, Ollenschlager G: [Evidence based guidelines and clinical pathways: complementation or contradiction?]. Internist (Berl) 2006,47(690):2–7.
- Silagy C, Weller D, Lapsely H, Middleton P, Shelby-James T, Fazekas B: The effectivenes of local adaptation of nationally produced clinical practice guidelines. Family Practice 2002, 19:223–230. CrossRef
- Sawicki PT, Bastian H: German health care: a bit of Bismarck plus more science. BMJ 2008, 337:a1997. CrossRef
- de Stampa M, Vedel I, Mauriat C, Bagaragaza E, Routelous C, Bergman H, et al.: Diagnostic study, design and implementation of an integrated model of care in France: a bottom-up process with continuous leadership. Int J Integr Care 2010, 10:e034.
- Bergert F, Braun M, Conrad D, Ehrenthal K, Feßler J, Gross J, et al.: Hausärztliche Leitlinie Stabile Angina pectoris und KHK. Köln: Leitliniengruppe Hessen; 2006.
- Nationale Versorgungsleitlinie Chronische KHK Köln: Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag; 2007.
- Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337:a1655. CrossRef
- Sandelowski M, Barroso J: Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qual Health Res 2003, 13:905–923. CrossRef
- Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, De Vries R, (Eds): Qualitative methods in health research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2010.
- Sandelowski M: Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health 1995, 18:179–183. CrossRef
- Hani MA, Keller H, Vandenesch J, Sonnichsen AC, Griffiths F, Donner-Banzhoff N: Different from what the textbooks say: how GPs diagnose coronary heart disease. Fam Pract 2007, 24:622–627. CrossRef
- Keller H, Kramer L, Krones T, Müller-Engelmann M, Baum E, Donner-Banzhoff N: Evaluation der Implementierung von Innovationen am Beispiel von arriba - eine Fokusgruppenstudie. Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin 2011, 87:35–41.
- Ajzen I: From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control: From cognition to behavior. Edited by: Kuhl J, Beckmann J. New York: Springer; 1985:11–39.
- Maxqda Berlin: VERBI: Software Consult Sozialforschung GmbH; 2007.
- Mayring P: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz; 2010.
- Hunter DJ, Fairfield G: Managed Care: Disease management. BMJ 1997, 315:50–53. CrossRef
- Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O: Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004, 82:581–629. CrossRef
- Ray-Coquard I, Philip T, de Laroche G, Froger X, Suchaud J, Voloch A, et al.: A controlled "before-after" study: impact of a clinical guidelines programme and regional cancer network organization on medical practice. Br J Cancer 2002, 86:313–321. CrossRef
- Formoso G, Liberati A, Magrini N: Practice guidelines: useful and "participative" method? Survey of Italian physicians by professional setting. Arch Intern Med 2001, 161:2037–2042. CrossRef
- Jones A: A modernized mental health service: the role of care pathways. J Nurs Manag 1999, 7:331–338. CrossRef
- De Allegri M, Schwarzbach M, Loerbroks A, Ronellenfitsch U: Which factors are important for the successful development and implementation of clinical pathways? A qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf 2011, 20:203–208. CrossRef
- Summerskill WS, Pope C: 'I saw the panic rise in her eyes, and evidence-based medicine went out of the door'. An exploratory qualitative study of the barriers to secondary prevention in the management of coronary heart disease. Fam Pract 2002, 19:605–610. CrossRef
- Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, et al.: Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med 2010, 8:63. CrossRef
- Lemmens KM, Nieboer AP, Rutten-Van Molken MP, van Schayck CP, Spreeuwenberg C, Asin JD, et al.: Bottom-up implementation of disease-management programmes: results of a multisite comparison. Qual Saf Health Care 2011, 20:76–86. CrossRef
- Braithwaite J, Runciman WB, Merry AF: Towards safer, better healthcare: harnessing the natural properties of complex sociotechnical systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2009, 18:37–41. CrossRef
- Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, et al.: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004, 8:1–72.
- Grol R, Grimshaw J: From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003, 362:1225–1230. CrossRef
- Bronfenbrenner U: The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.
- Sorensen G, Emmons K, Hunt MK, Barbeau E, Goldman R, Peterson K, et al.: Model for incorporating social context in health behavior interventions: applications for cancer prevention for working-class, multiethnic populations. Prev Med 2003, 37:188–197. CrossRef
- Vandenbroucke JP: Observational research, randomised trials, and two views of medical science. PLoS Med 2008, 5:e67. CrossRef
- Campbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J, Emery J, Farmer A, Griffiths F, et al.: Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ 2007, 334:455–459. CrossRef
- Lewin S, Glenton C, Oxman AD: Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ 2009, 339:b3496. CrossRef
- Paterson C, Baarts C, Launso L, Verhoef MJ: Evaluating complex health interventions: a critical analysis of the 'outcomes' concept. BMC Complement Altern Med 2009, 9:18. CrossRef
- Bandura A: Self efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
- Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S: A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci 2007, 2:40. CrossRef
- Hasson H: Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implement Sci 2010, 5:67. CrossRef
- Keith RE, Hopp FP, Subramanian U, Wiitala W, Lowery JC: Fidelity of implementation: development and testing of a measure. Implement Sci 2010, 5:99. CrossRef
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/13/36/prepub
- Qualitative evaluation of a local coronary heart disease treatment pathway: practical implications and theoretical framework
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
BMC Family Practice
- Online Date
- May 2012
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Primary health care
- Coronary artery disease
- Clinical pathways
- Qualitative research