Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of brand personality in charitable giving: An assessment and validation

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marketing concepts such as corporate identity, image, and branding are important strategies for nonprofit organizations. In particular, brand personality has been advocated by practitioners but has not been empirically investigated in the nonprofit context. According to social exchange theory and trust, the authors argue that nonprofit stakeholders perceive nonprofit organizations at an abstract level because of the organizations’ intangibility and social ideals. This study develops and refines a parsimonious measure of brand personality specifically for the nonprofit context. The authors conduct a series of six multimethod studies of nonprofit stakeholders to validate the role of brand personality in nonprofit organizations. The results yield four dimensions of brand personality for nonprofits: integrity, nurturance, sophistication, and ruggedness. Thus, current and potential donors ascribe personality traits to nonprofit organizations and differentiate between nonprofits on the basis of the organizations’ personality. Finally, nonprofit brand personality may influence potential donors’ likelihood to contribute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, David A. 1991.Managing Brand Equity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, Jennifer L. 1997. “Dimensions of Brand Personality.”Journal of Marketing Research 19 (August): 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999. “The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression in Persuasion.”Journal of Marketing Research 36 (February): 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000. “Accessibility or Diagnosticity? Disentangling the Influence of Culture on Persuasion Processes and Attitudes.”Journal of Consumer Research 26 (March): 340–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Vericona Benet-Martinez, and Jordi Garolera. 2001. “Consumption Symbols as Carriers of Culture: A Study of Japanese and Spanish Brand Personality Constructs.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (3): 492–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Fundraising Council. 2001.Giving USA: The Annual Report on Philanthropy. Indianapolis, IN: American Association of Fundraising Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. W. and J. C. Gerbing. 1988. “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (May): 186–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, Dennis B., Steve D. German, and Shelby D. Hunt. 2003. “The Identity Salience Model of Relationship Marketing Success: The Case of Nonprofit Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 67 (2): 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnould, Eric, Linda Price, and George Zinkhan. 2004.Consumers. 2d ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, Richard P. 1975. “Marketing as Exchange.”Journal of Marketing 39 (October): 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendapudi, N., S. N. Singh, and V. Bendapudi. 1996. “Enhancing Helping Behavior: An Integrative Framework for Promotion Planning.”Journal of Marketing 60 (July): 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Leonard. 2000. “Cultivating Service Brand Equity.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (1): 128–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and A. Parasuraman. 1991.Marketing Services. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M. 1964.Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. 1989.Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boris, Elizabeth T. 1999. “Nonprofit Organizations in a Democracy: Varied Roles and Responsibilities.” InNonprofit and Government. Eds. Elizabeth T. Boris and Eugene Steuerle. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, D. E. 2002. “Ties That Bind.”The Chronicle of Philanthropy 14 (11): 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, J. J. 1981. “Psychographic and Demographic Characteristics of Blood Donors.”Journal of Consumer Research 8 (June): 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and V. R. Wood. 1988. “A Proposed Model of the Donation Decision Process.”Research in Consumer Behavior 3:1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, K. 2002.Relationship Fundraising: A Donor Based Approach to the Business of Raising Money. 2d ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cermak, D. S. P., K. M. File, and R. A. Prince. 1994. “A Benefit Segmentation of the Major Donor Market.”Journal of Business Research 29:121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs.”Journal of Marketing Research 16 (February): 46–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. 1997. “Small and Medium Sized Charities Need a Strong Brand Too: Crisis Experience.”Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 2 (1): 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doney, Patricia M. and Joseph P. Cannon. 1997. “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships.Journal of Marketing 61 (2): 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. Robert, Paul H. Schurr, and Sejo Oh. 1987. “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 51 (April): 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrandi, J. M., P. Valette-Florence, and S. Fine-Falcy. 2000. “Aaker’s Brand Personality Scale in a French Context: A Replication and a Preliminary Test of Its Validity.” InProceedings of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 23. Ed. Charles H. Noble, 7–13.

  • Fornell, Claes and David F. Larker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grounds, J. and J. Harkness. 1998. “Developing a Brand From Within: Involving Employees and Volunteers When Developing a New Brand Position.”Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 3 (2): 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black. 1998.Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. H. 1990. “Benefit Segmentation for Fund Raisers.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18 (1): 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawks, J. K. 1997. “Charity American Style.” InFor a Good Cause? How Charitable Institutions Become Powerful Economic Bullies. Secaucus, NJ: Carol Publishing Group, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, George C. 1958. “Social Behavior and Exchange.”American Journal of Sociology 63 (May): 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P. 1990. “The ‘Big Five’ Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions of Personality in Natural Language and in Questionnaires.” InHandbook of Personality: Theory and Research. Ed. L. A. Pervin. New York: Guilford, 66–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Madeline and George M. Zinkhan. 1990. “Defining and Measuring Company Image.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17. Eds. M. Goldberg, G. Gorn, and R. W. Polly. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 110–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Jeff. 2002. “Nonprofit Times Top 100.”The Nonprofit Times, November 1, pp. 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. and S. J. Levy. 1969. “Broadening the Concept of Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 33 (1): 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, Domenica. 2003. “The Young and the Generous.”The Chronicle of Philanthropy, January 9, pp. 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. and Paul T. Costa. 1989. “The Structure of Interpersonal Traits: Wiggins’s Circumplex and Five-Factor Model.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (4): 586–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mindak, William A. and Malcolm H. Bybee. 1971. “Marketing’s Application to Fundraising.”Journal of Marketing 35 (3): 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C., R. Deshpande, and G. Zaltman. 1993. “Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 57 (January): 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 58 (3): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, E., E. Vinson, and H. P. Hatry. 2001. “Outcome Measurement in Nonprofit Organizations: Current Practices and Recommendations.” InIndependent Sector. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. E. 1991.Targeted Fund Raising. Chicago: Precept Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. “Developing Relationships With Donors.”Fund Raising Management 26 (6): 18–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, Warren T. 1963. “Toward an Adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attribute: Replicated Factor Structure in Peer Nomination Personality Ratings.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66: 574–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nucifora, Alf. 1998. “Smart Not-for-Profits Learn the Marketing Ropes.”Business News 11 (18): 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, Jum. 1979.Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy, J. A. and N. J. O’Shaughnessy. 2000. “Treating the Nation as a Brand: Some Neglected Issues.”Journal of Macromarketing 20 (1): 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltier, James, John Schibrowsky, and Don Schultz. 2002. “Leveraging Customer Information to Develop Sequential Communication Strategies: A Case Study of Charitable-Giving Behavior.”Journal of Advertising Research 42 (July/August): 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, Adrian. 1999. “Charitable Giving: Towards a Model of Donor Behaviour.”Journal of Marketing Management 15: 215–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. Brock and Donald W. Barclay. 1997. “The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 61 (1): 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Barbara, George M. Zinkhan, and Anupam Jaju. 2001. “Marketing Images: Construct Definition, Measurement Issues, and Theory Development.”Marketing Theory 1 (2): 201–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapp, A. 1996. “Charity Brands: A Qualitative Study of Current Practice.”Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 1 (4): 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tupes, Ernest C. and Raymond E. Christal. 1958. “Stability of Personality Trait Rating Factors Obtained Under Diverse Conditions.” USAF WADS Technical Report No. 58-61, U.S. Air Force, Lackland Air Force Base, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Institute. 2002.National Center for Charitable Statistics. Retrieved from http://nccsdataweb.urban.org/FAQ/index. php?category=73

  • Webb, D. J., C. L. Green, and T. G. Brashear. 2000. “Development and Validation of Scales to Measure Attitudes Influencing Monetary Donations to Charitable Organizations.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (2): 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, Murray S. and Nadine T. Jalandoni. 2001.The Nonprofit Almanac and Desk Reference (2001), Independent Sector. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wispe, L. 1978.Integrity, Sympathy and Helping. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, R. B. 1994. “Branding, Product Development and Positioning the Charity.”Journal of Brand Management 1 (6): 363–370.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Columbus State University, Columbus, USA

    Beverly T. Venable

  2. University of Washington, Tacoma

    Gregory M. Rose

  3. University of Mississippi, Mississippi, USA

    Victoria D. Bush

  4. Georgia College & State University, Georgia, USA

    Faye W. Gilbert

Authors
  1. Beverly T. Venable
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gregory M. Rose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Victoria D. Bush
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Faye W. Gilbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Beverly T. Venable (venable_beverly@colstate.edu; Ph.D., University of Mississippi) is an assistant professor of marketing at Columbus State University. Her research interests are in nonprofit marketing, branding, and ethics. She has published in theJournal of Business Ethics and several national and international proceedings.

Gregory M. Rose (rosegm@u.washington.edu; Ph.D., University of Oregon) is an associate professor of marketing at the University of Washington, Tacoma. His research interests include consumer socialization and cross-cultural consumer behavior. He has published articles in theJournal of Consumer Research, theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Business Research, theJournal of Advertising, and theJournal of Consumer Psychology, as well as other journals and proceedings.

Victoria D. Bush (vbush@bus.olemiss.edu; Ph.D., University of Memphis) is an associate professor of marketing at the University of Mississippi. Her research interests include cultural diversity in buyer-seller relationships, advertising ethics, and Internet marketing. Her research has been published in theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Advertising Research, theJournal of Advertising, theJournal of Public Policy and Marketing, andIndustrial Marketing Management, as well as other journals and proceedings.

Faye W. Gilbert (faye.gilbert@gcsu.edu; Ph.D., University of North Texas) is a professor of marketing and dean of the J. Whitney Bunting School of Business at Georgia College and State University. Her research interests are in customer relationship management, health care marketing, and sales management. She has published in theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Business Research, theJournal of Retailing, Psychology and Marketing, as well as other journals and proceedings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Venable, B.T., Rose, G.M., Bush, V.D. et al. The role of brand personality in charitable giving: An assessment and validation. JAMS 33, 295–312 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305276147

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305276147

Keywords

Search

Navigation