Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Price levels and price dispersion within and across multiple retailer types: Further evidence and extension

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, the authors develop hypotheses on how prices and price dispersion compare among pure-play Internet, bricks-and-mortar (traditional), and bricks-and-clicks (multichannel) retailers and test them through an empirical analysis of data on the book and compact disc categories in Italy during 2002. Their results, based on an analysis of 13,720 prkce quotes, show that when posted prices are considered, traditional retailers have the highest prices, followed by multichannel retailers, and pure-play e-tailers, in that order. However, when shipping costs are included, multichannel retailers have the highest prices, followed by pure-play e-tailers and traditional retailers, in that order. With regard to price dispersion, pure-play e-tailers have the highest range of prices, but the lowest standard deviation. Multichannel retailers have the highest standard deviation in prices with or without shipping costs. These findings suggest that online markets offer opportunities for retailers to differentiate within and across the retailer types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, J., J. Lynch, B. Weitz, C. Janiszewski, R. Lutz, A. Sawyer, and S. Wood. 1997. “Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces.”Journal of Marketing 61 (July): 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. P. 1998. “Electronic Commerce: Prices and Consumer Issues for Three Products: Books, Compact Discs, and Software.” Report OCDE/GD (98) 4. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development.

  • Bakos, J. Y. 1997. “Reducing Buyer Search Costs: Implications for Electronic Marketplaces.”Management Science 43 (12): 1676–1692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R. and A. Goolsbee. 2002. “Does the Internet Make Markets More Competitive? Evidence From the Life Insurance Industry.”Journal of Political Economy 110 (3): 481–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E. and M. Smith. 2000. “Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers.”Management Science 46 (4): 563–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay, K., R. Krishnan, E. Wolff, and D. Fernandes. 2002. “Retail Strategies on the Web: Price and Non-Price Competition in the Online Book Industry.”Journal of Industrial Economics 50 (3): 351–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, E. K., I. Hann, and L. M. Hitt. 2002. “The Nature of Competition in Electronic Markets: An Empirical Investigation of Online Travel Agent Offering.”Management Science 48 (4): 534–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degeratu, A. M., A. Rangaswamy, and J. Wu. 2000. “Consumer Choice Behavior in Online and Traditional Supermarkets: The Effect of Brand Name, Price, and Other Search Attributes.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 17 (1): 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erevelles, S., E. Rolland, and S. Srinivasan. 2001. “Are Prices Really Lower on the Internet?: An Analysis of the Vitamin Industry.” Working Paper. University of California. Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyanam, K. and S. McIntyre. 2002. “The E-Marketing Mix: A Contribution to the E-Tailing Wars.”Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 30 (4): 487–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. and M. Sarvary. 1999. “When and How Is the Internet Likely to Decrease Price Competition?.”Marketing Science 18 (4): 485–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. G. and D. Ariely. 2000. “Wine Online: Search Cost Affect Competition on Price, Quality and Distribution.”Marketing Science 19 (1): 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, F. S., F. Zettelmeyer, and J. S. Risso. 2001. “Internet Car Retailing.”Journal of Industrial Economics, 49 (4): 501–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, X., B. T. Ratchford, and V. Shankar. 2002. “Can Price Dispersion in Online Markets Be Explained by Differences in e-Tailer Service Quality?”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30 (4): 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, X., B. T. Ratchford, and V. Shankar. 2003a. “Price Dispersion on the Internet: A Review and Directions for Future Research.” Working Paper. Indiana University at Bloomington.

  • Pan, X., B. T. Ratchford, and V. Shankar. 2003b. “Why Aren’t the Prices of the Same Item the Same at Me.Com and You.Com? Drivers Of Prices Dispersion Among E-Tailers,” Working Paper. University of Maryland at College Park.

  • Pan, X., V. Shankar, and B. T. Ratchford. 2002. “Price Competition Between Pure-play vs. Bricks-and-Clicks E-Tailers: Analytical Model and Empirical Analysis.”Advances in Microeconomics: Economics of the Internet and e-Commerce 11: 29–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, X., V. Shankar, and B. T. Ratchford. 2003a. “The Evolution of Price Dispersion in Internet Markets.”Advances in Microeconomics: Economics of the Internet and e-Commerce 12.

  • —, and —. 2003b. “A Model of Retail Competition in Service and Price: Pure Play Internet vs Bricks-and-Mortar Retailers.” Working Paper. Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A. and G. M. Zinkhan. 2002. “Marketing to and Serving Customers Through the Internet: An Overview and Research Agenda.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30 (4): 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratchford, B., X. Pan, and V. Shankar. 2003. “On the Efficiency of Internet Markets for Consumer Goods.”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 22 (1): 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, P. S. and S. A. Smith. 2002. “Price Dispersion Then and Now: Evidence From Retail and E-Tail Markets.”Advances in Microeconomics: Economics of the Internet and e-Commerce 11: 63–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, V., X. Pan, and B. T. Ratchford. 2003. “Do Drivers of Online Price Dispersion Change Over Time?” Working Paper. University of Maryland at College Park.

  • Shankar, V., A. Rangaswamy, and M. Pusateri. 2001. “The Online Medium and Customer Price Sensitivity.” Working Paper, University of Maryland at College Park.

  • —, A. K. Smith, and A. Rangaswamy. 2003. “Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty in Online and Offline Environments.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 20 (2): 153–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, G. L. Urban, and F. Sultan. 2002. “Online Trust: A Stakeholder Perspective, Concepts, Implications and Future Directions.”Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11 (December): 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. D. 2002. “The Impact of Shopbots in Electronic Markets.”Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 30 (4): 446–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, F. and X. Xing. 2001. “Will the Growth of Multi-Channel Retailing Diminish the Pricing Efficiency of the Web?”Journal of Retailing 77: 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, R. P. and M. Yadav. 2002. “Marketing Strategy and the Internet: An Organizing Framework.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30 (4): 296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. T., P. Berthon, L. F. Pitt, and G. M. Zinkhan. 2000.Electronic Commerce: The Strategic Perspective. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zettelmeyer, F. 2000. “Expanding to the Internet: Pricing and Communication Strategies When Firms Compete on Multiple Channels.”Journal of Marketing Research 37 (3): 292–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, USA

    Venkatesh Shankar

Authors
  1. Fabio Ancarani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Venkatesh Shankar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

SDA Bocconi Graduate School of Management

Fabio Ancarani (fabio.ancarani@sdabocconi.it) is an assistant professor of marketing at SDA Bocconi University’s School of Management, Milan, Italy. He has been a visiting scholar at the Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland at College Park. His teaching and research interests are related to marketing strategies in the digital economy. His research has been published in journals such as the theJournal of Interactive Marketing and theEuropean Management Journal.

Venkatesh Shankar (vshankar@rhsmith.umd.edu) is a Ralph J. Tyser Fellow and an associate professor of marketing in the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland at College Park. His areas of reseach are e-business, competitive strategy, international marketing, pricing, new product management, and supply chain management. His research has been published or is forthcoming in theJournal of Marketing Research, Marketing Science, theJournal of Marketing, Strategic Management Journal, theJournal of Retailing, theInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, theJournal of Public Policy and Marketing, andMarketing Letters. He is co-editor of theJournal of Interactive Marketing; associate editor ofManagement Science; and serves on the editorial boards ofMarketing Science, theJournal of Marketing, theInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, theJournal of Retailing, and theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science. He is a three-time winner of the Krowe Award for Outstanding Teaching and teaches Marketing Management, Digital Business Strategy, Competitive Marketing Strategy, and International Marketing (http://www.venkyshankar.com).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ancarani, F., Shankar, V. Price levels and price dispersion within and across multiple retailer types: Further evidence and extension. JAMS 32, 176–187 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303261464

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303261464

Keywords

Search

Navigation