Skip to main content
Log in

Identity, identification, and relationship through social alliances

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors studied social alliances, a type of corporate societal marketing initiative. Their research finds that social alliances are an important means whereby employees identify more closely with their organizations while gaining a greater sense of being whole, integrated persons. Furthermore, this integration allows both organizations and their members to align their commercial identities with their moral and social identities. As organizational members struggled to resolve conflicts within their own identities, they were aided by social alliances, which in turn led them to identify more with their organizations. Unlike previous research, the findings suggest that the kind of connections referred to by the informants went well beyond the cold, rational associations described in previous research to emotional attachments that appear to be critical to organizational identification. The results also suggest that participation in social alliances may result in multiple forms of identification: intra- and interorganiza-tion identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, James E. and James Quinn 2005. “Timberland and Community Involvement (Abridged Version).” Harvard Business School Case #9-304-086, February 17.

  • Berger, Ida E., Peggy H. Cunningham, and Minette Drumwright. 1999. “Social Alliances: Company/Nonprofit Collaboration.”Social Marketing Quarterly 5 (3): 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, and —. 2004. “Social Alliances: Company-Nonprofit Collaboration.”California Management Review 47 (Fall): 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., Hayagreeva Rao, and Mary Ann Glynn. 1995. “Understanding the Bond of Identification: An Investigation of Its Correlates Among Art Museum Members.”Journal of Marketing 59 (October): 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bost, Brent. 2003.The Harried Woman Syndrome. New York: Vantage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Tom J. and Peter A. Dacin. 1997. “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Reponses.”Journal of Marketing 61 (January): 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, Michael G. Pratt, and David A. Whetten. 2006. “Identity, Intended Image, Construed Image, and Reputation: An Interdisciplinary Framework and Suggested Terminology.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(2): 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, Jennifer A. 1991. “Matching People and Organizations: Selection and Socialization in Public Accounting Firms.”Science Quarterly 36 (September): 459–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, Lewis Anthony. 1970.Elite and Specialized Interviewing. Evan-ston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumwright, Minette E. 1994. “Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996. “Company Advertising With a Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria.”Journal of Marketing 60 (October): 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Patrick E. Murphy. 2001. “Corporate Societal Marketing.” InHandbook of Marketing and Society. Eds. Paul Bloom and Gregory Gundlach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 162–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, Jane E., Janet M. Dukerich, and Celia V. Harquail. 1994. “Organizational Images and Member Identification.”Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (June): 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, Kimberly D. 1999. “An Expanded Model of Organizational Identification.”Research in Organizational Behavior 21: 163–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilly, Mary C. and Mary Wolfinbarger. 1998. “Advertising’s Internal Audience.”Journal of Marketing 61 (January): 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josselson, Ruthellen. 1992.The Space Between Us. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, Robert V. 2001. “Utopian Enterprise: Articulating the Meanings of Star Trek’s Culture of Consumption.”Journal of Consumer Research 28 (June): 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, Donald R., Minette E. Drumwright, and Bridgette M. Braig. 2004. “The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-Supported Nonprofits.”Journal of Marketing 68 (4): 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacRae-Campbell, Linda. 1988. “Whole Person Education: Nurturing the Compassionate Genius in Each of Us.”In Context 18 (Winter): 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, Grant. 1988.The Long Interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.”American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, Charles and Jennifer Chatman. 1986. “Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior.”Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (August): 492–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, and David F. Caldwell. 1991. “People, and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-Organization Fit.”Academy of Management Journal 34 (September): 487–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Sankar and C. B. Bhattcharya. 2001. “Does Dong Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility.”Journal of Marketing Research 38 (May): 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiggle, Susan. 1994. “Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 21 (December): 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahilevitz, Michal and John Myers. 1998. “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell.”Journal of Consumer Research 24 (March): 434–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. 1990.Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. 1982.Social Identity and Intergroup Behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lee, Reggie, Lisa Fabish, and Nancy McGraw. 2005. “The Value of Corporate Values.” Strategy+Business Magazine, Reprint #05206, Summer.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Ida E. Berger (bergeri@ryerson.ca) is the associate director of faculty affairs and a professor of marketing in the School of Business Management at Ryerson University. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Toronto. Her articles have appeared in leading marketing journals, including theJournal of Consumer Research, Public Policy and Marketing, theJournal of Consumer Psychology, andCalifornia Management Review. Her current research interests include social alliances, voluntary and nonprofit sector studies, diversity, and the value of sports in social inclusion. Her teaching interests include marketing theory, consumer behavior, and marketing communications.

Peggy H. Cunningham (pcunningham@business.queensu.ca) is the Marie Shantz Teaching Associate Professor of Marketing, School of Business, in the Queen’s University. She completed her Ph.D. at Texas A&M University. Dr. Cunningham’s research interests revolve around two related themes: marketing ethics and marketing partnerships (international strategic alliances, partnerships between for-profit and not-for-profit organizations, relationships between firms and their customers). These areas of study are linked by their focus on the concepts of trust, integrity, and commitment. She is the coauthor of the Canadian editions of a number of marketing textbooks (Marketing Management; Principles of Marketing; and Marketing: An Introduction). Her work is published in a number of journals, including theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, the Journal of International Marketing, and California Management Review.

Minette E. Drumwright (mdrum@mail.utexas.edu) is an associate professor with a joint appointment in the College of Communication (Department of Advertising) and the College of Liberal Arts at The University of Texas at Austin. Previously, Dr. Drumwright was on the marketing faculties of Harvard Business School and the University of Texas Business School. She currently is the faculty chair of the Bridging Disciplines Program in Ethics and Leadership at the University of Texas. She has a Ph.D. in business administration (marketing) from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Dr. Drumwright’s current research is in the areas of corporate social responsibility, marketing for nonprofit organizations, and business ethics. Her focus is on understanding how managers and consumers integrate noneco-nomic criteria related to society into their decision making. Dr. Drumwright has studied noneconomic criteria in various contexts, including cause-related marketing, partnerships between companies and nonprofit organizations, socially responsible buying behavior, and corporate volunteerism. Her articles and cases have been published in various books and journals, includingCalifornia Management Review, theJournal of Advertising, and theJournal of Marketing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berger, I.E., Cunningham, P.H. & Drumwright, M.E. Identity, identification, and relationship through social alliances. JAMS 34, 128–137 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284973

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284973

Keywords

Navigation