Skip to main content
Log in

Implications of loyalty program membership and service experiences for customer retention and value

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Companies that offer loyalty reward programs believe that their programs have a long-run positive effect on customer evaluations and behavior. However, if loyalty rewards programs increase relationship durations and usage levels, customers will be increasingly exposed to the complete spectrum of service experiences, including experiences that may cause customers to switch to another service provider. Using cross-sectional, time-series data from a worldwide financial services company that offers a loyalty reward program, this article investigates the conditions under which a loyalty rewards program will have a positive effect on customer evaluations, behavior, and repeat purchase intentions. The results show that members in the loyalty reward program overlook or discount negative evaluations of the company vis-à-vis competion. One possible reason could be that members of the loyalty rewards program perceive that they are getting better quality and service for their price or, in other words, “good value.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. Stacy. 1965. “Inequity in Social Exchange.” InAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Ed. Leonard Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press, 267–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Eugene W., Claes Fornell, and Donald R. Lehmann. 1994. “Customer Satisfaction, Market Share and Profitability: Findings From Sweden.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearden, William O. and Jesse E. Teel. 1983. “Selected Determinants of Customer Satisfaction and Complaint Reports.”Journal of Marketing Research 20 (February): 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, David E. 1982. “Regret in Decision Making Under Uncertainty.”Operations Research 30:961–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendapudi, Neeli and Leonard L. Berry. 1997. “Customers' Motivations for Maintaining Relationships With Service Providers.”Journal of Retailing 73 (1): 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, James R. and Mita Sujan. 1987. “Effects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Expert and Novice Customers.”Journal of Customer Research 14 (September): 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Ruth N. 1998. “A Dynamic Model of the Duration of the Customer's Relationship With a Continuous Service Provider: The Role of Satisfaction.”Marketing Science 17 (1): 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Katherine N. Lemon. 1999. “A Dynamic Model of Customers' Usage of Services: Usage as an Antecedent and Consequence of Satisfaction.”Journal of Marketing Research 36 (2): 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, William, Richard Staelin, Ajay Kalra, and Valarie Zeithaml. 1993. “A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (February): 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Ajay Kalra, and Richard Staelin. 1997. “The Quality Double Whammy: The Rich Stay Rich and the Poor Stay Poor.” Working paper. Duke University, Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, Douglas and Shilpa Lele-Pingle. 1997. “Buyer Behavior in Business-to-Business Services: The Case of Foreign Exchange.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 14 (5): 499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collopy, Fred. 1996. “Biases in Retrospective Self-Reports of Time Use: An Empirical Study of Computer Users.”Management Science 52 (5): 758–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, Lawrence A. and Nancy Stephens. 1987. “Effects of Relationship Marketing on Satisfaction, Retention, and Prices in the Life Insurance Industry.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (November): 404–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Alan S. and Kunal Basu. 1994. “Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22 (2): 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilly, Mary C. and Betsy D. Gelb. 1982. “Post-Purchase Customer Processes and the Complaining Customer.”Journal of Customer Research 9 (December): 323–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R. and H. Einhorn. 1992. “Order Effects in Belief Updating: The Belief-Adjustment Model.”Cognitive Psychology 24:1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman, J. Jeffrey, James S. Dyer, and Jianmin Jia. 1997. “A Generalized Utility Model of Disappointment and Regret Effects on Post-Choice Valuation.”Marketing Science 16 (2): 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Michael D. 1984. “Customer Choice Strategies for Comparing Noncomparable Alternatives.”Journal of Customer Research 11 (December): 741–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Michael D. and Seigyoung Auh. 1999. “Compatability Effects in Evaluations of Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 17 (4).

  • Jones, Thomas O. and W. Earl Sasser Jr. 1995. “Why Satisfied Customers Defect.”Harvard Business Review 73 (6): 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G. G., R. C. Hill, W. E. Griffiths, H. Lutkepohl, and T. C. Lee. 1988.Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keaveney, Susan M. 1995. “Customer Switching Behavior in Service Industries: An Exploratory Study.”Journal of Marketing 59 (April): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi, Lakshman, Tridib Mazumdar, and S. P. Raj. 1992. “Asymmetric Response to Price in Consumer Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Decisions.”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (December): 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBarbera, Priscilla A. and David Mazursky. 1983. “A Longitudinal Assessment of Customer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction: The Dynamic Aspect of the Cognitive Process.”Journal of Marketing Research 20 (November): 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, Graham and Robert Sugden. 1982. “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty.”The Economic Journal 92 (December): 805–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, Mary Frances. 1998. “Choosing to Avoid: Coping With Negatively Emotion-Laden Customer Decisions.”Journal of Customer Research 24 (March): 409–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, Tridib and Purushottam Papatla. 1995. “Loyalty Differences in the Use of Internal and External Reference Prices.”Marketing Letters 6 (March): 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morwitz, Vicki. 1997. “Why Customers Don't Always Accurately Predict Their Own Future Behavior.”Marketing Letters 8 (1): 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and David Schmittlein. 1992. “Using Segmentation to Improve Sales Forecasts Based on Purchase Intent: Which “Intenders' Actually Buy.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (November): 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowlis, S. M. and Itamar Simonson. 1997. “Attribute-Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Customer Preference Reversals.”Journal of Marketing Research 34:205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, Louise and Charles Jones. 1995. “Do Rewards Really Create Loyalty?”Harvard Business Review 73 (May–June): 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard. 1980. “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions.”Journal of Marketing Research 17:460–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, Fredrick F. and W. Earl Sasser. 1990. “Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services.”Harvard Business Review 14 (March): 495–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, F. Dall'Olmo, A.S.C. Ehrenberg, S.B. Castleberry, T.P. Barwise, and N. R. Barnard. 1997. “The Variability of Attitudinal Repeat-Rates.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 14 (5): 437–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, Roland T., Jeffrey Inman, and Anthony Zahorik. 1995. “A Bayesian Model of Quality and Customer Retention.” Working Paper. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Richard Metters. 1996. “Mathematical Models of Service.”European Journal of Operational Research 91 (June): 427–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmittlein, David C., Donald G. Morrison, and Richard Colombo. 1987. “Counting Your Customers: Who Are They and What Will They Do Next.”Management Science 33 (January): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Robert A. Peterson. 1994. “Customer Base Analysis: An Industrial Purchase Process Application.”Marketing Science 13 (Winter): 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schul, Yaacov and Miriam Schiff. 1993. “Measuring Satisfaction With Organizations.”Public Opinion Quarterly 57 (4): 536–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, Itamar. 1992. “The Influence of Anticipating Regret and Responsibility on Purchase Decisions.”Journal of Customer Research 19:105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Amos Tversky. 1992. “Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (August): 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solnick, Sara J. and David Hemenway. 1992. “Complaints and Disenrollment at a Health Maintenance Organization.”Journal of Customer Affairs 26 (1): 90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard. 1985. “Mental Accounting and Customer Choice.”Marketing Science 4 (Summer): 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, James. 1958. “Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables.”Econometrica 31:24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, Mark and Gilles Laurent. 1997. “Editorial, Special Issue on Loyalty.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 14: 399–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahorik, Anthony J. and Roland T. Rust. 1992. “Modeling the Impact of Service Quality on Profitability: A Review.” InAdvances in Services Marketing. Vol 1. Eds. T. Swartz and R. Oliver. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 247–276.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Ruth N. Bolton is Ruby K. Powell Professor of Marketing in the Michael F. Price College of Business at the University of Oklahoma. Her current research is concerned with high-technology services sold to business-to-business customers. Her most recent work in this area studies how organizations can grow the value of their customer base through customer service and support. She previously held positions at the University of Maryland, GTE Laboratories Incorporated, the University of Alberta, Carnegie-Mellon University, and the University of British Columbia. Her business experience involves a variety of consulting projects addressing services marketing, customer satisfaction, and quality management issues in the telecommunications and information services industries. Her earlier published research investigates how organizations' customer service and pricing strategies influence customer satisfaction and loyalty. She received her B.Comm. with honors from Queen's University at Kingston and her M.Sc. and Ph.D. from Carnegie-Mellon University. She currently serves on the editorial boards of theJournal of Retailing, theJournal of Marketing, Marketing Science, Marketing Letters, theJournal of Marketing Research, and theJournal of Service Research. She has published articles in these and other journals.

P. K. Kannan is Safeway Fellow and Associate Professor of Marketing in the Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland. He received his Ph.D. from Purdue University. His research and teaching interests are in electronic commerce, and marketing research and modeling. His research on competitive market structures, consumers' loyalty, variety seeking, and reinforcement behaviors, and the effects of promotions on competition have appeared inMarketing Science, Management Science, Journal of Business Research, andInternational Journal of Research in Marketing. His current interests center on the marketing of information products such as market research, software, and data products using electronic channels such as the Internet covering issues of strategy, pricing, and product reliability. Articles focusing on these issues have appeared or are forthcoming inCommunications of the ACM, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, and theHandbook of Electronic Commerce. He is a member of the American Marketing Association, the Institute of Management Science, and the American Statistical Association. He has corporate experience with Tata Engineering and Ingersoll-Rand and has consulted for companies such as Frito-Lay, Pepsi Co, SAIC, and Fannie Mae. Prior to joining the University of Maryland, he was on the faculty of the University of Arizona, Tucson.

Matthew D. Bramlett is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Sociology and a faculty research assistant in the Department of Marketing at the University of Maryland, College Park. His dissertation is an event history analysis of the effects of children on the stability of marriages and cohabitations. His current research focuses on high-technology services sold to business-to-business customers. His other research interests include the commodification of sports and the exploitation of the consumer in professional sports, and the fertility effects of family planning programs in developing countries over time. He is a member of the Population Association of America and a member of the Family, Sociology of Population, and Race, Gender, and Class sections of the American Sociological Association. His work on the exploitation of the consumer in the National Football League will be published as a chapter in the forthcoming bookConsumers, Commodification and Media Culture: Perspectives on the New Forms of Consumption, edited by Mark Gottdiener, University of New York at Buffalo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolton, R.N., Kannan, P.K. & Bramlett, M.D. Implications of loyalty program membership and service experiences for customer retention and value. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 28, 95–108 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281009

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281009

Keywords

Navigation