Skip to main content
Log in

Psychiatry Morbidity and Mortality Rounds: Implementation and Impact

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study assessed the implementation of psychiatry morbidity and mortality rounds (M&Ms) on the clinical and educational practice in a children’s hospital.

Methods

Attendees to monthly M&Ms between July 2005 and May 2007 included staff and trainees from psychiatry, psychology, nursing, and social work. Cases were selected based on a priori risk criteria and each rated on the hospital’s four-level risk management scale. M&Ms were reviewed for recurrent patterns that contributed to adverse patient care. Attendees completed a survey at the end of each year, evaluating the educational value of the rounds.

Results

Possible opportunities for patient care improvement were found in 80% of the cases and fell into four overlapping areas: diagnostic/formulation errors, communication problems, system-based problems, and class/culture misunderstandings. Identifying these problems led to corrective actions and positive changes in patient care.

Conclusion

M&Ms appear to be a potentially productive venue for self-appraisal and case review to aid psychiatry programs in patient safety efforts and clinician education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kohn KT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds): To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC, Academy Press, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  2. Orlander JD, Fincke BG: Morbidity and mortality conference: a survey of academic internal medicine departments. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 656–658

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart M: Core Competencies: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education 2008. Available at www.acgme.org/acWebsite/home/home.asp

  4. Gordon LA: Can Cedars-Sinai’s “M+M matrix” save surgical education? Bull Am Coll Surg 2004; 89: 16–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kravet SJ, Howell E, Wright SM: Morbidity and mortality conference, grand rounds, and the ACGME’s core competencies. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: 1192–1194

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Biddle C, Oaster TR: Investigating the nature of the morbidity and mortality conference. Acad Med 1990; 65: 420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Orlander JD, Barber TW, Fincke BG: The morbidity and mortality conference: the delicate nature of learning from error. Acad Med 2002; 77: 1001–1006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murayama KM, Derossis AM, DaRosa DA, et al: A critical evaluation of the morbidity and mortality conference. Am J Surg 2002; 183: 246–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pierluissi E, Fischer MA, Campbell AR, et al: Discussion of medical errors in morbidity and mortality conferences. JAMA 2003; 290: 2838–2842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leape LL, Berwick DM: Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned? JAMA 2005; 293: 2384–2390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kinzie JD, Maricle RA, Bloom JD, et al: Improving quality assurance through psychiatric mortality and morbidity conferences in a university hospital. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1992; 43: 470–474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Coleman RL, Hunter DE: Contemporary quality management in mental health. Am J Med Qual 1995; 10: 120–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fauman MA: Quality assurance monitoring in psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 1989; 146: 1121–1130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Balla M, Knothe B, Lancaster J, et al: Group peer review in psychiatry: the relationship to quality improvement and quality care. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1996; 30: 653–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Berwick DM, Leape LL: Reducing errors in medicine. Qual Health Care 1999; 8: 145–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gillig PM, Barr A: A model for multidisciplinary peer review and supervision of behavioral health clinicians. Community Ment Health J: 1999; 35: 361–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goh J, Singh B: The national health performance framework: an evaluation model for use by psychiatrists. Australas Psychiatry 2005; 13: 111–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hollanda J: A role for morbidity and mortality conferences in psychiatry. Australas Psychiatry 2007; 15: 338–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel M, Hardy DW, Chand R: Peer review for residents. Acad Psychiatry 2005; 29: 490–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart Goldman M.D..

Additional information

At the time of submission, the authors declared no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldman, S., Demaso, D.R. & Kemler, B. Psychiatry Morbidity and Mortality Rounds: Implementation and Impact. Acad Psychiatry 33, 383–388 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.33.5.383

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.33.5.383

Keywords

Navigation