Abstract
Objective
The authors describe the complexity of social processes for implementing technological change. Once a new technology is available, information about its availability and benefits must be made available to the community of users with opportunities to try the innovations and find them worthwhile, despite organizational resistances.
Method
The authors reviewed the literature from psychiatry, psychology sociology business and technology to distill common denominators for success and failure related to implementing technology.
Results
Beneficial technological innovations that are simple to use and obviously save everyone time and effort are easy to inaugurate. However, innovations that primarily serve management rather than subordinates or front-line utilizers may fail despite considerable institutional effort. This article reviews and outlines several of the more prominent theoretical models governing successful institutional change.
Conclusions
Successful implementation of difficult technological changes requires visionary leadership that has carefully considered the benefits, consulted with influence leaders at all organizational levels to spot unintended consequences and sources of resistance, and developed a detailed plan and continuous quality assurance process to foster implementation over time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tang PC, Larosa MP, Gorden SM: Use of computer-based records, completeness of documentation, and appropriateness of documented clinical decisions. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1999; 6: 245–251
Cascardo DC: Are Electronic Medical Records Right for Your Practice? Medscape Money & Medicine. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/450653. Accessed July 21, 2006
Aydin CE, Forsythe DE: Implementing Computers in Ambulatory Care: Implications of Physician Practice Patterns for System Design. Proceedings of 1997 AMIA Fall Symposium, 1997, pp 677–681
Terry K: Electronic medical records make sense—at last. Med Econ 1999; 76: 134–153
Mohr DN, Carpenter PC, Claus PL, et al: Implementing an EMR: Paper’s Last Hurrah. JAMA Proceedings of the 19th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 1995, pp 157–161
Rogers EM: Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York, Free Press, 1995
Miller WR, Rollnick S: Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change, 2nd ed. New York, Guilford, 2002
Backer TE: Managing the human side of change in VA’s transformation. Hosp Health Serv Adm 1997; 42: 431–459
Armenakis AA, Harris SG, Mossholder KW: Creating readiness for organizational change. Hum Relat 1993; 46: 681–703
Steward TA: Rate your readiness to change. Fortune 1994; Feb 7: 106–107, 110
Marshall J, Conner DR: Another Reason Why Companies Resist Change. Strategy & Business, 1996. Available at http://www.strategy-business.com/press/article/8614?pg=0. Last accessed July 21, 2006
Diamond MA: Organizational Change as Human Process, Not Technique. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph. Reviewing the Behavioral Science Knowledge Base on Technology Transfer 1995, pp 119–131
Carr DK, Hard KJ, Trahant WJ: Managing the Change Process: A Field Book for Change Agents, Consultants, Team Leaders, and Reengineering Managers. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1996, pp 115–140
Deming WE: Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, 1982
Walton M: The Deming Management Method. New York, Perigee Trade, 1988
Nadler G, Hibino S, Farrell J: Creative Solution Finding: The Triumph of Breakthrough Thinking Over Conventional Problem Solving. Rocklin, Calif, Prima Publications, 1999
Kotter JP: Leading Change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harv Bus Rev, 1995, pp 59–67
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, J.S., Hilty, D.M., Worley, L.L. et al. Considerations in Change Management Related to Technology. Acad Psychiatry 30, 465–469 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.30.6.465
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.30.6.465