Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Media Violence Research and Youth Violence Data: Why Do They Conflict?

  • Media Column
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Contrary to media headlines and public perceptions, there is little evidence of a substantial link between exposure to violent interactive games and serious real-life violence or crime. Conclusion: Further research is needed on whether violent games may affect less dramatic but real concerns such as bullying, fighting, or attitudes and beliefs that support aggression, as well as how effects may vary by child characteristics and types of games. There is also a need for research on the potential benefits of violent games for some children and adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Springhall J: Youth, Popular Culture and Moral Panics: Penny Gaffs to Gangsta Rap, 1830–1996. New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare: Television and Growing Up: The Impact of Televised Violence. A Report to the Surgeon General. Washington, DC, HEW, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson CA, Dill KE: Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000; 78: 772–790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller SA: Malvo team cites role of violent media: Movie, video games seen brainwashing defendant. The Washington Times, 2003, p B01

  5. Vossekuil B et al.: The Final Report and Findings of the Safe School Initiative: Implications for the Prevention of School Attacks in the United States. Washington, D.C., United States Secret Service and United States Department of Education, 2002 (http://www.secretservice.gov/ntac_ssi.shtml)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shaffer D, Scott M, Wilcox H, Maslow C, Hicks R, Lucas CP, Garfinkel R, Greenwald S: The Columbia Suicide Screen: validity and reliability of a screen for youth suicide and depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004; 43: 71–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reddy M, et al.: Evaluating risk for targeted violence in schools: comparing risk assessment, threat assessment and other approaches. Psychology in the Schools 2001; 38: 157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Donohue E, Schiraldi V, Zeidenberg J: School House Hype: The School Shootings, and the Real Risks Kids Face in America. San Francisco, Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, 1998 (www.cjcj.org)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Romer D, Jamieson KH, Aday, S: Television news and the cultivation of fear of crime. J Communication 2003; 53: 88–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowry DT, Nio TCJ, Leitner DW: Setting the public fear agenda: a longitudinal analysis of network TV crime reporting, public perceptions of crime, and FBI crime statistics. J Communication 2003; 53: 61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grossman D, Degaetano G: Stop Teaching Our Kids to Kill: A Call to Action Against TV, Movie and Video Game Violence. New York, Crown, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  12. Snyder HN: Juvenile arrests 2001, in Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  13. Snyder HN, Sickmund M: Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report. Washington, DC, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blumstein A, Rosenfeld R: Trends in rates of violence in the USA. Studies on Crime & Crime Prevention 1999; 8: 139–167

    Google Scholar 

  15. Buka SL, Stichick TL, Birdthistle I, Earls FJ: Youth exposure to violence: prevalence, risks and consequences. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2001; 71: 298–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roberts DF et al.: Kids & Media @ the New Millennium. Menlo Park, Calif, Kaiser Family Foundation, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  17. Interactive Digital Software Association: Video Games and Youth Violence: Examining the Facts. Washington, DC, IDSA, 2001, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  18. Federal Trade Commission: Marketing Violent Entertainment to Children: A Review of Self-Regulation in Industry Practices in the Motion Picture, Music Recording & Electronic Game Industries. Washington, DC, FTC, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  19. Protect Children from Video Game Sex and Violence Act of 2003.

  20. Engrossed substitute House Bill 1009 (Act related to video and computer games depicting violence against public law enforcement officers) 2003

  21. Whittier S: The recent school shootings: Are video game manufacturers liable? New York Law Journal 1999

  22. Anderson CA, Bushman BJ: The effects of media violence on society. Science 2002; 295: 2377–2379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Irwin A, Gross AM: Cognitive tempo, violent video games, and aggressive behavior in young boys. J Family Violence 1995; 10: 337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Silvern SB, Williamson PA: The effects of video game play on young children’s aggression, fantasy, and prosocial behavior. J Appl Dev Psychol 1987; 8: 453–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson CA: An update on the effects of playing violent video games. J Adolesc 2004; 27: 113–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. US Department of Health and Human Services: Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC, HHS, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  27. Uhlmann E, Swanson J: Exposure to violent video games increases automatic aggressiveness. J Adolesc 2004; 27: 41–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Griffiths M: Video games and aggression. Psychologist 1997; 10: 397–401

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sherry JL: The effects of violent video games on aggression: a meta-analysis. Human Communication Research 2001; 27: 409–431

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roe K, Muijs D: Children and computer games: a profile of the heavy user. Eur J Communication 1998; 13: 181–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Light RJ, Pillemer DB: Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gliner JA, Morgan GA, Harmon RJ: Meta-analysis: formulation and interpretation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003; 42: 1376–1379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Funk JB: Impact of interactive violence on children, in Senate Commerce Committee, 2000

  34. Bensley L, Van Eenwyk J: Video games and real-life aggression: review of the literature. J Adolesc Health 2001; 29: 244–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nansel TR, Overpeck M, Pilla RS, Ruan WJ, Simons-Morton B, Scheidt P: Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA 2001; 285: 2094–2100

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. DeVoe JF, et al: Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2003. Washington, DC, National Center for Education Statistics, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  37. Grunbaum JA, et al.: Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States, 2001. Centers for Disease Control—Surveillance Summaries, 51(SS-4). Atlanta, CDC, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  38. Funk JB, et al., Playing violent video games, desensitization, and moral evaluation in children. Appl Dev Psychol 2003; 24: 413–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Earls FJ: Violence and today’s youth, in The Future of Children 1994; 4(3): 4–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Thadhani R, Camargo CA Jr, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB: Prospective study of moderate alcohol consumption and risk of hypertension in young women. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 569–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Madden M: America’s online pursuits: the changing picture of who’s online and what they do, in Pew Internet & American Life Project. Edited by Rainie L. Washington, DC, Pew, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  42. Marriott M: Making high-tech play less work. The New York Times. 2004

  43. Kushner D: With a nudge or vibration, game reality reverberates. The New York Times, 2003

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School Center for Mental Health and Media, 271 Waverley Oaks Rd., Waltham, Massachussetts, 02452-8403, USA

    Cheryl K. Olson M.P.H., S.D. (Professor of Psychiatry)

Authors
  1. Cheryl K. Olson M.P.H., S.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheryl K. Olson M.P.H., S.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olson, C.K. Media Violence Research and Youth Violence Data: Why Do They Conflict?. Acad Psychiatry 28, 144–150 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.28.2.144

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.28.2.144

Keywords

Search

Navigation