Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 76–81

Residents’ Perception of Effectiveness of Twelve Evaluation Methods for Measuring Competency

Authors

  • Kay K. Cogbill
    • College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Office of Educational DevelopmentUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    • College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Office of Educational DevelopmentUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  • James Clardy
    • College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Office of Educational DevelopmentUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Original Article

DOI: 10.1176/appi.ap.29.1.76

Cite this article as:
Cogbill, K.K., O’Sullivan, P.S. & Clardy, J. Acad Psychiatry (2005) 29: 76. doi:10.1176/appi.ap.29.1.76

Abstract

Objective: The authors assessed residents’ perceptions of techniques used to evaluate competency. Methods: Psychiatry residents from a single program rated 12 evaluation techniques for their effectiveness to measure resident competency. They rated each method for 25 selected skills reflecting the six general competencies. Results: Sixteen residents (70%) completed the survey. Responses indicated that different methods were effective for different competencies. Residents saw objective structured clinical examinations and standardized patients as equally effective. They favored the 360° evaluation method for all competencies except medical knowledge. Resident perception of the effective techniques differed from preferred techniques identified by measurement experts. Conclusions: Residency program directors using guidelines from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to select preferred evaluations may find that residents do not have the same perceptions.

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2005