How Competent Are We to Assess Psychotherapeutic Competence in Psychiatric Residents?
- Joel YagerAffiliated withDepartment of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico School of MedicineDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles School of MedicineAmerican Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education (APIRE) Email author
- , David BienenfeldAffiliated withDepartment of Psychiatry, Wright State University
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Background: The Residency Review Committee (RRC) for Psychiatry has mandated that training programs “must demonstrate that residents have achieved competency in at least the following forms of treatment: brief therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, combined psychotherapy and psychopharmacology, psychodynamic therapy, and supportive therapy.” Aim: To analyze the extent to which programs can realistically demonstrate that residents have achieved summative competency in these modalities. Method: We briefly review methods from other fields for assuring procedural competence, review methods available to psychiatric educators for assuring competencies in psychotherapy, and assess these methods for their adequacy. Results: Available and foreseeable assessment methods are incapable of demonstrating that residents achieve summative competency in the five specified psychotherapies or of definitively distinguishing potentially dangerous practitioners from safe practitioners. At best, educators may be able to assure formative competencies, including mastery of core knowledge of the psychotherapies, actual undertaking of these psychotherapies, and adequate performance in selected elements of these psychotherapies. Conclusions: Since it is unrealistic to assume that training programs will ever be able to confirm summative competencies in these psychotherapies, we advise programs to define precisely the levels of formative competence they expect, and design curriculum and measures accordingly. Further, we urge the RRC to revise their requirements to address expectations more honestly, and to re-state the expected competencies more modestly. We believe that the RRC can expect programs to show that all residents can demonstrate knowledge about the evidence base, theories and rules of practice supporting at least the following forms of treatment: brief therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, combined psychotherapy and psychopharmacology, psychodynamic therapy, and supportive therapy. We also believe that programs might be asked to demonstrate by means of patient logs and other forms of documentation that all residents have at least conducted such types of psychotherapy under qualified supervision.
- How Competent Are We to Assess Psychotherapeutic Competence in Psychiatric Residents?
Volume 27, Issue 3 , pp 174-181
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, 2400 Tucker NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131-5326, USA
- 2. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 3. American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education (APIRE), Arlington, USA
- 4. Department of Psychiatry, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA