Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reflections on the four facets of symmetry: how physics exemplifies rational thinking

  • Published:
The European Physical Journal H Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In contemporary theoretical physics, the powerful notion of symmetry stands for a web of intricate meanings among which I identify four clusters associated with the notion of transformation, comprehension, invariance and projection. While their interrelations are examined closely these four facets of symmetry are scrutinised one after the other in great detail. This decomposition allows us to carefully examine the multiple different roles symmetry plays in many places in physics. Furthermore, some connections with other disciplines like neurobiology, epistemology, cognitive sciences and, not least, philosophy are proposed in an attempt to show that symmetry can be an organising principle also in these fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle 1938. Categories. On interpretation. Prior analytics. Loeb classical library, Harvard university press, Cambridge. Bilingual edition commented an translated from the Greek by Harold P. Cooke and Hugh Tredennick.

  • Arnold, V.I. 1984. Catastrophe Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York.

  • Auger, P. 1952. L’homme microscopique. Flammarion, Paris. 1966 for the 2nd edition.

  • Auletta, G. 2006. The controversial relationships between science and philosophy: a critical assessment. Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Vatican City.

  • Avramides, A. 2001. Other minds. The problems of philosophy, Routledge, New York.

  • Baars, B.J. and N.M. Gage. 2010. Cognition, brain, and consciousness. Introduction to cognitive neuroscience. Academic Press, Burlington. 2nd edition.

  • Barchielli, A. and M. Gregoratti. 2009. Quantum Trajectories and Measurements in Continuous Time. The diffusive Case. Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 782. Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Batterman, R.W. 2011. Emergence, singularities, and symmetry breaking. Found. Phys. 41(6): 1031–1050.

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bedau, M.A. and P. Humphreys. 2008. Emergence: Contemporary readings in philosophy and science. a Bradford book, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

  • Belot, G. 2003. Notes on symmetries, in: Brading/Castellani03a. pp. 393–412. Chap. 24.

  • Binétruy, P. 2006. Supersymmetry. Theory, experiment, and cosmology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Birkhoff, G.D. 1933. Aesthetic measure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. See also Birkhoff56a.

  • Birkhoff, G.D. 1956. Mathematics of aesthetics, in: Newman, J.R. (Ed.), The world of mathematics, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, Vol. 4, part XXI. pp. 2185–2195.

  • Bokulich, A. and P. Bokulich (Eds.) 2010. Scientific structuralism. volume 281, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Borges, J.L. 1942. Ficciones. Grove Press, New York. Translated from the original Spanish by Anthony Bonner and edited by Anthony Kerrigan (1962).

  • Born, M. 1953. Physical reality. Philos. Quart. 3: 139–149. Reproduced as chap. 9 of Castellani98a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N. 2002. Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy (Studies in Philosophy). Routledge, New York.

  • Boswell, J. 1791/2008. The Life of Samuel Johnson. Penguin Classics, Penguin Books, London. Edited by David Womersley.

  • Bourbaki, N. 1968. Theory of sets. Elements of mathematics, Hermann, Paris. Translated from the French original edition Théorie des ensembles.

  • Boussinesq, J. 1877. Sur la conciliation de la liberté morale avec le déterminisme scientifique. C. R. Acad. Sci. 84: 362–364. Note by Adhémar-Jean-Claude Barré de Saint-Venant on the work reedited in Boussinesq22a. Available on http://gallica.bnf.fr.

    URL  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boussinesq, J. 1922. Cours de physique mathématiques de la faculté des sciences. Complément au tome III, Conciliation du véritable déterminisme mécanique avec l’existence de la vie et de la liberté morale. Gauthier-Villars, Paris. Available on http://gallica.bnf.fr.

  • Brading, K. and H.R. Brown. 2004. Are gauge symmetry transformations observable? British J. Philos. Sci. 55: 645–665.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brading, K. and E. Castellani. 2003. Symmetries in physics. Philosophical reflections. Cambridge University Press.

  • Breuer, H.P. and F. Petruccione. 2002. The theory of open quantum systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Bricmont, J. and A.P. Sokal. 2001. Defense of a modest scientific realism, in: Knowledge and the world. Challenges beyond the science wars, Springer, Berlin. pp. 17–45.

  • Brink, D.M. 1965. Nuclear forces. The Commonwealth and international library. Selected readings in physics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, Vol. 354.

  • Brown, J.H. and G.B. West. 2000. Scaling in Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Bruno, G. 1584/1995. La cena de le ceneri – The ash wednesday supper. Renaissance Society of America. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Vol. 4. Translated from the original Italian by Edward A. Gosselin and Lawrence S. Lerner.

  • Butterfield, J. 2005. On the persistence of particles. Found. Phys. 35: 233–269.

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, J. 2011. Less is different: Emergence and reduction reconciled. Found. Phys. 41 (6): 1065–1135.

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. 1999. The mathematical brain. Macmillan, London. US edition (Free Press) is entitled: What counts. How every brain is hardwired for math.

  • Campbell, D.T. 1959. Methodological suggestions from a comparative psychology of knowledge processes. Inquiry 2: 152–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. 1960. Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review 67: 380–400. Reprinted as chap. III of Radnitzky/Bartley87a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. 1974. Evolutionary epistemology, in: Schilpp P.A. (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois. pp. 413–463. Reprinted as chap. II of Radnitzky/Bartley87a. For an updated account of Campbell’s influence see Heyes/Hull01a.

  • Carnap, R. 1966. Philosophical foundations of physics. An introduction to the philosophy of science. Basic Books Inc., New York.

  • Cassirer, E. 1938. Le concept de groupe et la théorie de la perception. Journal de Psychologie normale et Pathologique 35: 368–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. 1944. The concept of group and the theory of perception. Philosophy and phenomenological research V, 1–36. Translated by Aron Gurwitsch from the original French Cassirer38a.

  • Castellani, E. (Ed.). 1998. Interpreting bodies. Classical and quantum objects in modern physics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

  • Castellani, E. 2002. Reductionism, emergence and effective field theories. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 33: 251–267.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Castellani, E. 2003. Symmetry and equivalence, in: Brading/Castellani03a. pp. 425–436. Chap. 26.

  • Chandrasekhar, S. 1987. Truth and beauty. Aesthetics and motivations in science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Changeux, J.P. 1985. Neuronal man. The biology of mind. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Translation by Laurence Garey from the French original edition L’homme neuronal (1983, Fayard).

  • Changeux, J.P. 2002. The physiology of truth. Neuroscience and human knowledge (mind/brain/behaviour initiative). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Translation by M. B. DeBevoise from the French original edition L’homme de vérité (Odile Jacob).

  • Changeux, J.P. 2012. The Good, the True, and the Beautiful: A Neuronal Approach. Yale University Press, New haven and London. Translated and revised by Laurence Garey from the French original edition Du vrai, du beau, du bien: une nouvelle approche neuronale (2008, Odile Jacob).

  • Changeux, J.P., P. Courrège and A. Danchin. 1973. A theory of the epigenesis of neuronal networks by selective stabilization of synapses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70: 2974–2978.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Choquet-Bruhat, Y. and C. DeWitt-Morette. 1982. Analysis, manifolds and physics. Elsevier science, Amsterdam. Revised Edition (Part I).

  • Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the mind. Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Cornwell, J.F. 1984. Group theory in physics. Academic Press, London, Vol. 2.

  • Cournot, A.A. 1851/1956. An Essay on the foundations of our knowledge. The Liberal Arts Press, New York. Translated by Merritt H. Moore from the original French Essai sur les fondements de nos connaissances et sur les caractères de la critique philosophique available on http://gallica.bnf.fr.

  • Cournot, A.A. 1861. Traité de l’enchaînement des idées fondamentales dans les sciences et dans l’histoire. Hachette, Paris. Available on http://gallica.bnf.fr.

  • Curie, P. 1894. Sur la symétrie dans les phénomènes physiques, symétrie d’un champ électrique et d’un champ magnétique. J. de Physique (3ème série) III: 393–415. Available on http://gallica.bnf.fr. English translation in [pp. 17–25]Rosen82a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, D.W. 1980. The aesthetic dimension of science. Nobel Conference, Philosophical library, New York.

  • Cusa, N. 1440/1985. On learned ignorance. A translation and an appraisal of De Docta Ignorantia. Arthur J. Banning Press, Minneapolis. Translated from the original Latin by Germain Heron.

  • Dawkins, R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Debs, T.A. and M. Redhead. 2007. Objectivity, invariance, and convention. Symmetry in physical science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

  • Dehaene, S. 1997. The number sense. How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Delahaye, J.P. 1999. Information, complexité et hasard. Hermès Science Publications, Paris.

  • Demazure, M. 2000. Bifurcations and catastrophes. Geometry of solutions to nonlinear problems, Universitext, Springer, Berlin. Translated by David Chillingworth from the French edition Catastrophes et bifurcations (Ellipses, 1989).

  • Dennett, D.C. 1996. Kinds of minds. Toward an understanding of consciousness. Science Masters Series, Basic Books, New York.

  • Dirac, P.A.M. 1926. On the theory of quantum mechanics. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 112: 661–677.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P.A.M. 1930. A theory of electrons and protons. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 126: 360–365.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P.A.M. 1963. The evolution of the physicist’s picture of nature. Sci. Amer. 208: 45–53.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P.A.M. 1982. Pretty mathematics. Int. J. Theoret. Phys. 21: 603–605.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duck, I. and E.C.G. Sudarshan. 1997. Pauli and the spin-statistics theorem. World Scientific, Singapore.

  • Duhem, P. 1906/1954. The aim and structure of physical theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Translated by Philip P. Wiener from the French original edition La théorie physique, son objet, sa structure (Chevalier et Rivière, 1906).

  • Edelman, G.M. 1978. Group selection and phasic reentrant signalling: a theory of higher brain function, in: Edelman, G.M. and V.B. Mountcastle (Eds.), Mindful brain. Cortical organization and the group-selective theory of higher brain function, The MIT Press, Cambridge. p. 51.

  • Edelman, G.M. 1987. Neural darwinism. The theory of neuronal group selection. Basic Books, New York.

  • Edelman, G.M. 1992. Bright air, brilliant fire. On the matter of the mind. BasicBooks, New York.

  • Edelman, G.M. 2006. Second nature. Brain science and human knowledge. Yale University Press, New Haven.

  • Einstein, A. 1936. Physics and reality. J. Franklin Inst. 221: 349–382. Translated by Jean Piccard from the original german text, pp. 313–347.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. 1949. Reply to criticisms, in: Schilpp, P.A. (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher scientist, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois. pp. 665–688.

  • Esfeld, M. 2006. Scientific realism and the history of science, in: Auletta06a. pp. 251–275.

  • Everett III, H. 1957. “Relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29: 454–462. Reproduced as Section II.3 of Wheeler/Zurek83a.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, H. and G. Maxwell (Eds.). 1962. Scientific explanation, space, and time. volume III of Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota press, Minneapolis. http://www.mcps.umn.edu/philosophy/complete.html.

  • Feigl, H. and M. Scriven (Eds.) 1956. Foundations of science and the concepts of psychology and psychoanalysis. volume I of Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota press, Minneapolis. http://www.mcps.umn.edu/philosophy/complete.html.

  • Feynman, R.P., R.B. Leighton and M. Sands. 1970. The Feynman lectures on physics. Addison Wesley publishing company, Reading, Massachusetts.

  • Fine, A. 1996. The shaky game. Einstein realism and the quantum theory. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 2nd edn.

  • Fonda, L. and G.C. Ghirardi. 1970. Symmetry principles in quantum physics. Theoretical Physics, vol. 1, Marcel Dekker, New York.

  • van Fraassen, B.C. 1989. Laws and symmetry. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Fresnel, A. 1818. Mémoire sur la diffraction de la lumière. Mem. Ac. sc. Inst. Fr. T5: 339–475, available at http://www.academie-sciences.fr/activite/archive/dossiers/Fresnel/Fresnel˙publi.htm

    URL  Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, G. 1632. Dialogo sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo. Le opere di Galileo Galilei, Edizione Nazionale, vol. VII (1897) under the direction of Antonio Favaro, G. Barbera, Firenze.

  • Galilei, G. 1632/1981. Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems: Ptolemaic and Copernican. The Modern Library, New York. Translated from the original Italian by Stillman Drake.

  • Gibbs, J.W. 1902/2010. Elementary principles in statistical mechanics: developed with especial reference to the rational foundation of thermodynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Reprint of original 1902 edition.

  • Giedymin, J. 1982. Science and Convention. Essays on Henri Poincaré’s Philosophy of Science and the Conventionalist Tradition. Foundations & Philosophy of Science & Technology, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

  • Giedymin, J. 1992. Conventionalism, the pluralist conception of theories and the nature of interpretation. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 23: 423–443.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Giulini, D., E. Joos, C. Kiefer, J. Kupsch, I.O. Stamatescu and H.D. Zeh. 2003. Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. (2nd edition).

  • Hacyan, S. 2009. Geometry as an object of experience: the missed debate between Poincaré and Einstein. Eur. J. Phys. 30: 337–343.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J. 1954. Essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Dover Publications, New York. Cambridge University Press (1945) for the original first edition.

  • Haldane, J.B.S. 1927. Possible worlds and other essays. Chatto and Windus, London.

  • Hamilton, W. 1861. Discussions on philosophy and literature. Harper and Brothers, New York.

  • Hanson, N.R. 1958. Patterns of discovery. An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Hardy, G.H. 1940. A mathematician’s apology. Cambridge: University Press, Cambridge. http://www.math.ualberta.ca/mss/.

  • Hartle, J.B. 2005. The physics of ‘Now’. Amer. J. Phys. 73: 101–109.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. 1926. The many-body problem and resonance in quantum mechanic. Zts. f. Phys. 38: 411–426. English translation in Duck/Sudarshan97a pp. 115–125.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. 1927. The many-body problem and resonance in quantum mechanic II. Zts. f. Phys. 40: 239–267.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. 1932. On the structure of atomic nuclei, I. Zts. f. Phys. 77: 1–11. English translation in Brink65a pp. 144–154.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. 1958. Physics and philosophy. The revolution in modern science. volume 1958 of World perspectives. Harper and brothers, New York.

  • Heisenberg, W. 1974. Across the frontiers. volume 1974 of World perspectives. Harper and Rows, New York.

  • Henshilwood, C.S., F. d’Errico, R. Yates, Z. Jacobs, C. Tribolo, G.A.T. Duller, N. Mercier, J.C. Sealy, H. Valladas, I. Watts and A.G. Wintle. 2002. Emergence of modern human behavior: Middle stone age engravings from South Africa. Science 295: 1278–1280.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, C.M. and D.L. Hull (Eds.) 2001. Selection theory and social construction. The evolutionary naturalistic epistemology of Donald T. Campbell. Suny Series in Philosophy and Biology, State University of New York Press, New York.

  • Hon, G. and B.R. Goldstein. 2008. From summetria to symmetry: The making of a revolutionary scientific concept. Volume 20 of Archimedes. Springer.

  • Houtappel, R.M.F., H. Van Dam and E.P. Wigner. 1965. The conceptual basis and use of the geometric invariance principles. Rev. Modern Phys. 37: 595–632.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L. 2001. Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Hume, D. 1758/1999. An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford Philosophical Texts, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Edited by Tom L. Beauchamp.

  • Ismael, J. and B.C. van Fraassen. 2003. Symmetry as a guide to superfluous theoretical structure, in: Brading/Castellani03a. pp. 371–392. Chap. 23.

  • James, W. 1880. Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly 46: 441–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammer, M. 1994. Concepts of space. The history of theories of space in physics. Dover Publications, New York.

  • Jeffreys, H. 1931. Scientific inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Jones, H.F. 1998. Groups, representations and physics. Institute Of Physics Publishing, Bristol.

  • Kadanoff, L.P. 2000. Statistical physics. Statics, dynamics and renormalization. World Scientific, Singapore.

  • Kant, I. 1781/1998. Critique of pure reason. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood.

  • Klein, F. 1893. A comparative review of recent researches in geometry. Bull. New York Math. Soc. 2: 215–249. Translated by M.W. Haskell from the German original (1872).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmann-Schwarzbach, Y. 2010. The Noether theorems. Invariance and conservation laws in the twentieth century (sources and studies in the history of mathematics and physical sciences). Springer. Translated by Bertram E. Schwarzbach from theFrench original edition (Les Éditions de l’École Polytechnique, 2004).

  • Kosso, P. 2003. Symmetry, objectivity and design, in: Brading/Castellani03a. pp. 413–424. Chap 25.

  • Laertius, D. 1925. Lives of eminent philosophers (Vol. 2, books 6–10). Loeb classical library, Harvard university press, Cambridge. Bilingual edition commented and translated from the Greek by R.D. Hicks.

  • Landauer, R. 1967. Wanted: a physically possible theory of physics. IEEE Spectrum 4: 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, R. 1999. Information is a physical entity. Physica A 263: 63–67.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Langevin, P. 1923. La physique depuis vingt ans. Gaston Douin, Paris.

  • Laudan, L. 1981. A confutation of convergent realism. Philos. Sci. 48: 19–49. Reprinted as Chap. VI of Papineau96a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. 1984. Realism without the real. Philos. Sci. 51: 156–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. 1990. Demystifying underdetermination, in: Savage90a. pp. 267–297. http://www.mcps.umn.edu/philosophy/complete.html. reproduced as Chap. 2 of Laudan96a.

  • Laudan, L. 1996. Beyond positivism and relativism. Theory, method, and evidence. Westview Press, Boulder.

  • Leff, H.S. and A.F. Rex (Eds.). 2003. Maxwell’s demon 2. Entropy, classical and quantum information, computing, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol.

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. 1968. The savage mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Translated from the original French La pensée sauvage (Plon, 1962).

  • Lewis, P.J. 2001. Why the pessimistic induction is a fallacy. Synthese 129: 371–380.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M. and P. Vitányi. 2008. An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications. Texts in Computer Science, Springer, New York. 3rd edition.

  • Lipscomb, W.N. 1980. Aesthetic aspect of science, in: Curtin80a. pp. 1–24.

  • Llinás, R.R. 2001. I of the vortex. From neurons to self. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

  • Mach, E. 1906/1976. Knowledge and Error: Sketches on the Psychology of Enquiry. Vienna Circle Collection (Book 3) translated from the 5th edition of Erkenntnis und Irrtum from the German by T.J. McCormack and P. Foulkes. Reidel Publishing Compagny, Dordrecht.

  • Machery, É. 2009. Doing without concepts. Oxford University Press, New York.

  • Margolis, E. and S. Laurence. 2007. The ontology of concepts-abstract objects or mental representations? NOÛS 41: 561–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, G. 1962. The ontological status of theoretical entities, in: Feigl/Maxwell62a. pp. 3–27. http://www.mcps.umn.edu/philosophy/complete.html.

  • McAllister, J.W. 1996. Beauty and revolution in science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

  • Moriyasu, K. 1983. An elementary primer for gauge theory. World Scientific, Singapore.

  • Morrison, P. 1995. Nothing is too wonderful to be true. volume 11 of Masters of Modern Physics. American Institute of Physics Press, New York.

  • Mouchet, A. 2013a. An alternative proof of Wigner theorem on quantum transformations based on elementary complex analysis. Phys. Lett. A 377: 2709–2711.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Mouchet, A. 2013b. L’élégante efficacité des symétries. UniverSciences, Dunod, Paris.

  • Murphy, G.L. 2002. The big book of concepts. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

  • von Neumann, J. 1932/1955. Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Translated by Robert T. Beyer from the original German edition (1932).

  • Nozick, R. 2001. Invariances. The structure of the objective world. The Belknap Press of Harvard university press, Cambridge.

  • Papineau, D. 1996. The philosophy of science. Oxford Readings in Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Penrose, R. 1974. The rôle of aesthetics in pure and applied mathematical research. Bull. Inst. Math. Appl. 10: 266–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. 1980. On schwarzschild causality – a problem for “lorentz covariant” general relativity, in: Tipler, F.J. (Ed.), Essays in general relativity: a festschrift for Abraham Taub, Academic Press, New York. pp. 1–12.

  • Penrose, R. 1997. The large, the small and the human mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Platek, S.M., J.P. Keenan and T.K. Shackelford. 2007. Evolutionary cognitive neuroscience. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

  • Poincaré, H. 1891. Les géométries non euclidiennes. Rev. Gén. Sci. Pur. Appl 2: 769–774. Reproduced with modifications in chap. III of Poincare52a and the section Geometry and astronomy is reproduced in Chap. V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. 1895. L’espace et la géométrie. Revue de métaphysique et de morale 3: 631–646. Reproduced with modifications in Chap. IV of Poincare52a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. 1900a. Les relations entre la physique expérimentale et la physique mathématique. Rev. Gén. Sci. Pur. Appl. 11: 1163–1175. English translation in Poincare1900b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. 1900b. The relations between experimental and mathematical physics. Sci. Amer. 83: 282. Reproduced in chapters IX et X of Poincare52a.

  • Poincaré, H. 1902. Sur la valeur objective de la science. Revue de métaphysique et de morale 10: 263–293. Reproduced as chap. X and XI of Poincare58a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. 1903. L’espace et ses trois dimensions. Revue de métaphysique et de morale 11: 281–301. Reproduced as chap. III of Poincare58a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. 1908. L’invention mathématique. Bulletin de l’institut général psychologique 8ième anné e, mai-juin (3): 4–15. Reproduced as chap. III of Poincare59a.

  • Poincaré, H. 1911. L’Évolution des lois. Scientia (Rivista di Scienza) 9: 275–292, reproduced as Chap. I of (Poincaré, yearPoincare1913) without the Section on differential equations.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. 1913. Dernières pensées. Flammarion, Paris, available at www.ac-nancy-metz.fr/enseign/philo/textesph/#poinca

  • Poincaré, H. 1952. Science and hypothesis. Dover Publications, Inc., New York. Translated by W.J. Greenstreet from the French La science et l’hypothèse (Flammarion, 1902).

  • Poincaré, H. 1958. The Value of Science. Dover Publications, Inc., New York. Translated by George Bruce Halsted from the French La valeur de la science (Flammarion, 1905).

  • Poincaré, H. 1959. Science and method. Dover Publications, Inc., New York. Translated by Francis Maitland from the French Science et méthode (Flammarion, 1908).

  • Popper, K. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge, London.

  • Popper, K. 1969. Conjectures and refutations. The growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge, London. 3rd edition.

  • Popper, K. 1978. Natural selection and the emergence of mind. Dialectica 32: 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. 1979. Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Revised edition of the original edition (1972).

  • Poston, T. and I. Stewart. 1978. Catastrophe theory and its applications, Pitman, London, p. 5166.

  • Presilla, C., R. Onofrio and U. Tambini. 1996. Measurement quantum mechanics and experiments on quantum zeno effect. Ann. Physics 248: 95–121.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific realism. How science tracks truth. Routledge, London.

  • Putnam, H. 1975. Mathematics, matter and method. Philosophical Papers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2nd edn., Vol. 1.

  • Putnam, H. 1978. Meaning and the moral sciences. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

  • Radnitzky, G. and W.W. Bartley. 1987. Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge. Open Court Publishing Company, Peru.

  • Reichenbach, H. 1938. Experience and prediction. An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Rosch, E. 1978. Principles of categorization, in: Rosch, E. and B.L. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale. pp. 27–48.

  • Rosen, J. 1982. Symmetry in physics. Selected reprints. American Association of Physics Teachers, Melville.

  • Russell, B. 1917. Mysticism and logic, and other essays. George Allen and Unwin, London. Original publication in New Quaterly (November 1907).

  • Russell, B. 1919. Introduction to mathematical philosophy. George Allen and Unwin, London. Republished by Dover (1993).

  • Sankey, H. 2001. Scientific realism: An elaboration and a defence. Theoria 98: 35–54. Reproduced in Chap. 1 of Sankey08a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankey, H. 2008. Scientific Realism and the Rationality of Science. Ashgate, Burlington.

  • Savage, C.W. (Ed.). 1990. Scientific theories. volume XIV of Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota press, Minneapolis. http://www.mcps.umn.edu/philosophy/complete.html.

  • Schlosshauer, M. 2007. Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition. The frontiers collection, Springer, Berlin.

  • Schrödinger, E. 1944. What is life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Segerstråle, U. 2000. Defenders of the Truth. The battle for science in the sociobiology debate and beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Sellars, W. 1956. Empiricism and the philosophy of mind, in: Feigl/Scriven56a. pp. 253–329. http://www.mcps.umn.edu/philosophy/complete.html. reprinted as Chap. 5 of Sellars91a.

  • Sellars, W. 1991. Science, perception and reality. Ridgeview Publishing Compagny, Atascadero.

  • Seth, A.K. and B.J. Baars. 2005. Neural Darwinism and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 14: 140–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T. 2004. The evolution of Darwinism. Selection, adaptation, and progress in evolutionary biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Simon, R. N. Mukunda, S. Chaturvedi and V. Srinivasan. 2008. Two elementary proofs of the Wigner theorem on symmetry in quantum mechanics. Phys. Lett. A 372: 6847–6852.

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.E. 1998. Concepts and categorization, in: Smith/Osherson95a. pp. 3–33. Chap. 1.

  • Smith, E.E. and D.N. Osherson (Eds.). 1995. Thinking. An Invitation to Cognitive Science 2nd edn., Vol. 3:, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

  • Sokal, A.P. and J. Bricmont. 1998. Fashionable nonsense. Postmodern intellectuals’ abuse of science. Picador, New York.

  • Sternberg, S. 1994. Group theory and physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Stump, D. 1991. Poincaré’s thesis of the translatability of euclidean and non-euclidean geometries. NOÛS 25: 639–657.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Taine, H. 1872. On intelligence. Holt and Williams, New York. Translated by T.D. Haye from the French De l’intelligence (1870).

  • Tarasov, L. 1986. This Amazingly Symmetrical World. Symmetry around us, symmetry at the heart of everything. Mir Publishers, Moscow. Translated from Russian edition (1982) by Alexander Repyev.

  • Toulmin, S.E. 1967. The evolutionary development of natural science. Amer. Sci. 55: 456–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.E. 1972. Human understanding. The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

  • Ullmo, J. 1969. La pensée scientifique moderne. Flammarion, Paris.

  • Utiyama, R. 1956. Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction. Phys. Rev. 101: 1597–1607.

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, A. 1960. De la métaphysique aux mathématiques. Sciences, 52–56 Reproduced, pp. 408–412 in Weil79a.

  • Weil, A. 1979. Œuvres scientifiques. Collected papers, Vol. II: 1951–1964. Springer-Verlag, New York.

  • Weinberg, S. 1992. Dreams of a final theory. The scientist’s search for the ultimate laws of nature. Pantheon Books, New York.

  • Weinberg, S. 1995. The quantum theory of fields (Vol. I: Foundations). Cambridge University Press, New York.

  • Weinberg, S. 2000. The quantum theory of fields (Vol. III: Supersymmetry). Cambridge University Press, New York.

  • Weyl, H. 1949. Philosophy of mathematics and natural sciences. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Revised and augmented English edition translated by Olaf Helmer from the German.

  • Weyl, H. 1952. Symmetry. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Traduction française: Symétrie et mathématique moderne, 1964, Flammarion, Paris.

  • Wheeler, J.A. and W.H. Zurek (Eds.). 1983. Quantum theory and measurement, Princeton series in physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

  • Wigner, E.P. 1960. The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 13: 1–14.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, E.P. 1995. Philosophical reflections and syntheses. Springer, Berlin. Annoted by Gérard G. Emch.

  • Worrall, J. 1989. Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica 43: 99–124. Reprinted as Chap. VII of Papineau96a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C.N. 1980. Beauty and theoretical physics, in: Curtin80a. pp. 25–40.

  • Yang, C.N. 1994. Conceptual beginnings of various symmetries in twentieth century physics. Chinese J. Phys. 32: 1437–1446.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C.N. and R.L. Mills. 1954. Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance. Phys. Rev. 96: 191–195.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A., H.A. Keuzenkamp and M. McAleer (Eds.). 2001. Simplicity, inference and modelling. Keeping it sophisticatedly simple. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Mathématiques et de Physique Théorique, Université François Rabelais de Tours – CNRS (UMR 7350), Fédération Denis Poisson, Parc de Grandmont, 37200, Tours, France

    Amaury Mouchet

Authors
  1. Amaury Mouchet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amaury Mouchet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mouchet, A. Reflections on the four facets of symmetry: how physics exemplifies rational thinking. EPJ H 38, 661–702 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2013-40018-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2013-40018-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation