Skip to main content
Log in

Is superhydrophobicity robust with respect to disorder?

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal E Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider theoretically the Cassie-Baxter and Wenzel states describing the wetting contact angles for rough substrates. More precisely, we consider different types of periodic geometries such as square protrusions and disks in 2D, grooves and nanoparticles in 3D and derive explicitly the contact angle formulas. We also show how to introduce the concept of surface disorder within the problem and, inspired by biomimetism, study its effect on superhydrophobicity. Our results, quite generally, prove that introducing disorder, at fixed given roughness, will lower the contact angle: a disordered substrate will have a lower contact angle than a corresponding periodic substrate. We also show that there are some choices of disorder for which the loss of superhydrophobicity can be made small, making superhydrophobicity robust.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Roach, N.J. Shirtcliffe, M.I. Newton, Soft Matter 4, 224 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. X. Zhang, F. Shi, J. Niu, Y. Jiang, Z. Wang, Journal of Materials Chemistry 18, 621 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Genzer, K. Efimenko, Biofouling 22, 339 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Quéré, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 38, 71 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Yang, U. Tartaglino, B. Persson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 116103 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Sbragaglia, A.M. Peters, C. Pirat, B.M. Borkent, R.G.H. Lammertink, M. Wessling, D. Lohse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 156001 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Bhushan, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367, 1445 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Rioboo, M. Voué, A. Vaillant, D. Seveno, J. Conti, A.I. Bondar, D.A. Ivanov, J. De Coninck, Langmuir 24, 9508 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Desbief, B. Grignard, C. Detrembleur, R. Rioboo, A. Vaillant, D. Seveno, M. Voué, J. De Coninck, A.M. Jonas, C. Jérome, P. Damman, R. Lazzaroni, Langmuir 26, 2057 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Grignard, A. Vaillant, J. De Coninck, M. Piens, A.M. Jonas, C. Detrembleur, C. Jérome, Langmuir 27, 335 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. De Coninck, F. Dunlop, T. Huillet, J. Stat. Mech., P06013 (2011).

  12. P. Collet, J. De Coninck, F. Dunlop, A. Regnard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3704 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Collet, J. De Coninck, K. Drouiche, F. Dunlop, Colloid Polym. Sci. 291, 291 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Rioboo, B. Delattre, D. Duvivier, A. Vaillant, J. De Coninck, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 175, 1 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Barthlott, C. Neinhuis, Planta 202, 1 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P.S. Tsai, Y.M. Yang, Y.L. Lee, Nanotechnology 18, 465604 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Dunlop.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Coninck, J., Dunlop, F. & Huillet, T. Is superhydrophobicity robust with respect to disorder?. Eur. Phys. J. E 36, 104 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2013-13104-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2013-13104-2

Keywords

Navigation