Abstract
We study model locomotors on a substrate, which derive their propulsive capabilities from the tangential (viscous or frictional) resistance offered by the substrate. Our aim is to develop new tools and insight for future studies of cellular motility by crawling and of collective bacterial motion. The purely viscous case (worm) is relevant for cellular motility by crawling of individual cells. We re-examine some recent results on snail locomotion in order to assess the role of finely regulated adhesion mechanisms in crawling motility. Our main conclusion is that such regulation, although well documented in several biological systems, is not indispensable to accomplish locomotion driven by internal deformations, provided that the crawler may execute sufficiently large body deformations. Thus, there is no snail theorem. Namely, the crawling analog of the scallop theorem of low Reynolds number hydrodynamics does not hold for snail-like crawlers. The frictional case is obtained by assuming that the viscous coefficient governing tangential resistance forces, which act parallel and in the direction opposite to the velocity of the point to which they are applied, depends on the normal force acting at that point. We combine these surface interactions with inertial effects in order to investigate the mechanisms governing the motility of a bristle-robot. This model locomotor is easily manufactured and has been proposed as an effective tool to replicate and study collective bacterial motility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Di Leonardo et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 9541 (2010).
L. Mahadevan et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 23 (2004).
B. Chan, N.L. Balmforth, A.E. Hosoi, Phys. Fluids 17, 113101 (2005).
Z.V. Guo, L. Mahadevan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 3179 (2008).
D.L. Hu et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 10081 (2009).
E.D. Tytell et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 19832 (2010).
E.M. Purcell, Am. J. Phys. 45, 3 (1977).
F. Alouges, A. DeSimone, L. Heltai, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 21, 361 (2011).
F. Alouges, A. DeSimone, A. Lefebvre, J. Nonlinear Sci. 18, 277 (2008).
F. Alouges, A. DeSimone, A. Lefebvre, Eur. Phys. J. E 28, 279 (2009).
L. Giomi, N. Hawley-Weld, L. Mahadevan Bristle-Bots: a model system for locomotion and swarming. Paper presented at the APS March Meeting, Boston 2012.
G.I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A. 209, 447 (1951).
S. Childress Mechanics of Swimming and Flying, Cambridge Studies in Mathematical Biology, Vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981).
G. Gray, G.J. Hancock, J. Exp. Biol. 32, 802 (1955).
Y. Tanaka, K. Ito, T. Nakagaki, R. Kobayashi, J. Roy. Soc. Interface 9, 222 (2012).
F. Alouges, Optimally swimming stokesian robots, to be published in Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. B.
A. DeSimone in Natural Locomotion in Fluids and on Surfaces, edited by S. Childress, A. Hosoi, W.W. Schultz, Z.J. Wang, IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Application (Springer-Verlag, 2012), pp. 177-185.
G. Dal Maso, A. DeSimone, M. Morandotti, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 43, 1345 (2011).
A. Najafi, R. Golestanian, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, S1203 (2005).
J.H. Lai, J.C. del Alamo, J. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, J.C. Lasheras, J. Exp. Biol. 213, 3920 (2010).
M. Denny, Nature 285, 160 (1980).
E. Lauga, A.E. Hosoi, Phys. Fluids 18, 113102 (2006).
A. Tatone in Trends in Compuational Contact Mechanics, edited by G. Zavarise, P. Wriggers (Springer Verlag, 2011).
P. Wriggers Computational Contact Mechanics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2006).
B. Alberts Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th edition (Garland Science, New York, 2002).
L. Cardamone et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 13978 (2011).
T.D. Pollard, W.C. Earnshaw Cell Biology, 2nd edition (Saunders, Philadelphia, 2008).
E.L. Barnhart et al., Biophys. J. 98, 933 (2010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DeSimone, A., Tatone, A. Crawling motility through the analysis of model locomotors: Two case studies. Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 85 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2012-12085-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2012-12085-x