Abstract
In order to generate mass for an abelian spin-1 vector field while preserving gauge invariance we couple it to a symmetric tensor. The derivative coupling includes up to three derivatives. We show that unitarity, causality and absence of Stueckelberg (compensating) fields single out a unique model up to trivial field redefinitions. The model contains one massive and one massless spin-1 particle. It is shown by means of a master action to be dual to the direct sum of a Maxwell plus a Maxwell–Proca theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the rest of this section we always take f=m and d=m 2/4 for simplicity. No essential difference appears in the general case.
A similar master action can be defined to prove the duality between the TMBF model of [5, 11–13] and the Maxwell–Proca theory. Introducing an auxiliary vector field B μ in order to lower the order of the kinetic term for the antisymmetric field B μν we have
$$ \mathcal{L}_M = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu}^2(A) - \frac{1}{2} B^{\mu}B_{\mu} + \frac{1}{2} T_{\mu}\bigl(B^{\mu}+ m A^{\mu}\bigr) $$(61)where T μ=ϵ μναβ ∂ ν B αβ . Integrating over B μ we derive the TMBF model while integrating over B μν we have the Stueckelberg form of the Maxwell–Proca theory.
References
P. Higgs, Phys. Lett. 12, 132 (1964)
F. Englert, R. Brout, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 321 (1964)
P. Higgs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 508 (1964)
H. Ruegg, M. Ruiz-Altaba, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19, 3265–3348 (2004)
E. Cremmer, J. Scherk, Nucl. Phys. B 72, 117–124 (1974)
A. Aurilia, Y. Takahashi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 66, 693 (1981)
T.J. Allen, M.J. Bowick, A. Lahiri, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 559 (1991)
R. Amorim, J. Barcelos-Neto, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 10, 917–924 (1995)
D. Freedman, P.K. Townsend, Nucl. Phys. B 177, 282 (1981)
M. Henneaux, V.E.R. Lemes, C.A.G. Sasaki, S.P. Sorella, O.S. Ventura, L.C.Q. Vilar, Phys. Lett. B 410, 195–202 (1997)
A. Lahiri, Generating vector boson masses. hep-th/9301060 (1993)
A. Lahiri, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5045–5050 (1997)
A. Lahiri, Phys. Rev. D 63, 105002 (2001)
J. Barcelos-Neto, S. Rabello, Z. Phys. C 74, 715–719 (1997)
A. Khoudeir, R. Montemayor, L.F. Urrutia, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065041 (2008)
D. Dalmazi, E.L. Mendonça, Phys. Lett. B 707, 409–414 (2012)
J. Schwinger, Particles, Sources and Fields, vol. 1 (1998)
D.G. Boulware, S. Deser, Phys. Lett. B 40, 227–229 (1972)
P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Nucl. Phys. B 60, 478 (1973)
B. Podolsky, Phys. Rev. 62, 68 (1942)
D. Dalmazi, R.C. Santos, Phys. Rev. D 84, 045027 (2011)
S. Deser, R. Jackiw, Phys. Lett. B 139, 371 (1984)
M. Botta Cantcheff, J.A. Helayel-Neto, The doublet extension of tensor gauge potentials and a reassessment of the non-Abelian topological mass mechanism. arXiv:1112.4301 [hep-th]
P. Arias, Spin-2 in (2+1)-dimensions. Ph.D. thesis, Simon Bolivar U., 1994. gr-qc/9803083 (in Spanish)
Acknowledgements
We thank Alvaro de S. Dutra for helpful discussions. This work is partially supported by CNPq.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A
Following closely the notation of [24] we display here the rank-4 projection operators \(P_{JJ}^{(s)}\) and transition operators \(P_{WS}^{(0)},P_{SW}^{(0)}\) which appear in (14):
where the rank-2 spin-1 and spin-0 projection operators are given by
In order to check the operator G −1 given in (14) the reader can use the algebra
Appendix B
Assuming c 4≠0 here we show that the spin-2 pole of G −1 at c 4□−d=0 represents a ghost. The relevant piece of A(k) regarding the residue at k 2=−m 2=−d/c 4, see (14), (20), (19), and (29) is given by
Using the general decomposition of a symmetric tensor in momentum space: \(J_{\mu\nu} = k_{\mu}J_{\nu} + k_{\nu}J_{\mu} + J_{\mu\nu}^{T} \) with \(k^{\mu}J_{\mu\nu}^{T} = 0 = k^{\nu}J_{\mu\nu}^{T}\) we write
where \(J_{T} = (J_{T})^{\mu}_{\,\,\,\, \mu}\). Consequently, the imaginary part of the residue of A(k) at k 2=−m 2 is given by
It can be shown that \(J_{T}^{*}J_{T} > 0 \) at any dimension D>2 and \(J_{T}^{*}J_{T} = 0 \) at D=2. Since d>0, see (38), the absence of tachyons (m 2=d/c 4>0) requires c 4>0. Thus, R m <0 and we end up with a spin-2 ghost. Likewise one can check that spin-0 poles of G −1 at K=0 lead at least to one ghost.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dalmazi, D. Massive and massless spin-1 particles with gauge symmetry without Stueckelberg fields. Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2145 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2145-4
Received:
Revised:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2145-4