Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conceptual objections to the Bohr atomic theory — do electrons have a “free will” ?

  • Published:
The European Physical Journal H Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The atomic model introduced by Bohr in 1913 dominated the development of the old quantum theory. Its main features, such as the radiationless stationary states and the discontinuous quantum jumps between the states, were hard to swallow for contemporary physicists. While acknowledging the empirical power of the theory, many scientists criticized its foundation or looked for ways to reconcile it with classical physics. Among the chief critics were A. Crehore, J.J. Thomson, E. Gehrcke and J. Stark. This paper examines from a historical perspective the conceptual objections to Bohr’s atom, in particular the stationary states (where electrodynamics was annulled by fiat) and the mysterious, apparently teleological quantum jumps. Although few of the critics played a constructive role in the development of the old quantum theory, a history neglecting their presence would be incomplete and distorted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arabatzis, Theodore. 2006. Representing Electrons: A Biographical Approach to Theoretical Entities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

  • Benz, Ulrich. 1975. Arnold Sommerfeld: Lehrer und Forscher and der Schwelle zum Atomzeitalter. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftlicher Verlagsgesellschaft

  • Bohr, Niels. 1913. On the constitution of atoms and molecules. Philos. Mag. 26: 1–25; 476–502; 857–875

  • Bohr, Niels. 1915. On the quantum theory of radiation and the structure of the atom. Philos. Mag. 30: 394–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, Niels. 1918. On the quantum theory of line-spectra, Part I: On the general theory. Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Skrifter, Naturvidenskabelig og Mathematisk Afdeling, 8. Række IV.1

  • Bohr, Niels. 1922. The Theory of Spectra and Atomic Constitution, translated by A.D. Udden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Bohr, Niels. 1923a. The structure of the atom. Nature 112: 29–44

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, Niels 1923b. The effect of electric and magnetic fields on spectral lines. Proc. Phys. Soc. 25: 275–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, Niels 1924. On the application of the quantum theory to atomic structure. Part I: The fundamental postulates. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. (Suppl.) 22: 1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born, Max. 1971. The Born-Einstein Letters. London: Macmillan

  • Brillouin, Marcel. 1919. Actions mécaniques à hérédité discontinue par propagation; essai de théorie dynamique de l’atome à quanta. Comptes Rendus 168: 1318–1320

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Norman R. 1913. Modern Electrical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Crehore, Albert C. 1921. An atomic model based on electromagnetic theory. Philos. Mag. 42: 569–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrigol, Olivier. 1992. From c-Numbers to q-Numbers: The Classical Analogy in the History of Quantum Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press

  • Darrigol, Olivier. 1997. Classical concepts in Bohr’s atomic theory (1913–1925). Physis 34: 545–567

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, Michael and Karl Märker. 2000. Arnold Sommerfeld. Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, Vol. 1. Berlin: Verlag für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik

  • Eckert, Michael and Karl Märker. 2004. Arnold Sommerfeld. Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, Vol. 2. Berlin: Verlag für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik

  • Epstein, Paul S. 1918. Anwendungen der Quantenlehre in der Theorie der Serienspektren. Naturwissenschaften 17: 230–253

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Eve, Arthur S. 1939. Rutherford. Being the Life and Letters of the Rt Hon. Lord Rutherford, O.M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Favrholdt, David. 1999. Niels Bohr. Collected Works, Vol. 10. Amsterdam: North-Holland

  • Fujisaki, Chiyoko. 1982. P. Drude’s theory of dispersion of light and atom model (1900–1913). Hist. Scient. 22: 19–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrcke, Ernst. 1914. Über ein Modell zur Erklärung der Lichtemission. Phys. Zs. 15: 123–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrcke, Ernst. 1920. Über ein Modell zur Erklärung der Lichtemission, V. Phys. Zs. 21: 172–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbron, John L. and Thomas S. Kuhn. 1969. The genesis of the Bohr atom. Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 1: 211–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, William M. 1914. Discussion on the structure of atoms and molecules. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci., Report, 296–299

  • Holton, Gerald. 1970. The roots of complementarity. Dædalus 99: 1015–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer, Ulrich. 1981. Niels Bohr. Collected Works, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland

  • Jammer, Max. 1966. The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill

  • Jeans, James. 1913. Discussion on radiation. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci., Report, 376–386

  • Klein, Martin J. 1970. Paul Ehrenfest. Vol. 1: The Making of a Theoretical Physicist. Amsterdam: North-Holland

  • Kojima, Chieko. 2004. La physique Français avant Louis de Broglie. Ann. Fond. Louis de Broglie 29: 767–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Kragh, Helge. 1985. The fine structure of hydrogen and the gross structure of the physics community, 1916–26. Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 16: 67–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Kragh, Helge. 2011. Resisting the Bohr atom: The early British opposition. Phys. Persp. 13: 4–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramers, Hendrik A. and Helge Holst. 1923. The Atom and the Bohr Theory of its Structure: An Elementary Presentation. London: Gyldendal

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1978. Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894–1912. Oxford: Clarendon Press

  • Larmor, Joseph. 1897. On the theory of the magnetic influence on spectra; and on the radiation from moving ions. In Larmor, Mathematical and Physical Papers, Vol. 2, 1929, pp. 140–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Lewis, Gilbert N. 1916. The atom and the molecule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 38: 762–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Gilbert N. 1917. The static atom. Science 46: 297–302

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Gilbert N. 1923. Valence and the Structure of Atoms and Molecules. New York: Chemical Catalog Company

  • Lorentz, Hendrik A. 1922. On Whittaker’s quantum mechanism in the atom. Proc. Roy. Acad. Amsterdam 31: 414–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, Jagdish and Helmut Rechenberg. 1982. The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, Vol. 1. New York: Springer

  • Meyenn, Karl von. 2011. Eine Entdeckung von ganz Ausserordentlicher Tragweite: Schrödinger’s Briefwechsel zur Wellenmechanik und zum Katzenparadoxon. Heidelberg: Springer

  • Nisio, Sigeko. 1973. The formation of the Sommerfeld theory of 1916. Jap. Stud. Hist. Sci. 12: 39–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Oseen, Carl W. 1915. Das Bohrsche Atommodell und die Maxwellschen Gleichungen. Phys. Zs. 16: 395–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Leigh. 1922. Radiation from a group of electrons. Phys. Rev. 20: 18–25

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Page, Leigh. 1925. The Balmer law as an equation of motion. Phys. Rev. 23: 429–443

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Pais, Abraham. 1991. Niels Bohr’s Times, in Physics, Philosophy, and Polity. Oxford: Clarendon Press

  • Petruccioli, Sandro. 1993. Atoms, Metaphors and Paradoxes: Niels Bohr and the Construction of a New Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Planck, Max. 1915. Bemerkungen über die Emission von Spektrallinien. Sitzungsb. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 909–913

  • Reid, Constance. 1976. Courant in Göttingen and New York. The Story of an Improbable Mathematician. New York: Springer-Verlag

  • Riecke, Eduard. 1915. Bohrs Theorie der Serienspektren von Wasserstoff und Helium. Phys. Zs. 16: 222–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Peter. 1979. The Early Years: The Niels Bohr Institute 1921–1930. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag

  • Robotti, Nadia. 1983. The spectrum of ξ Puppis and the historical evolution of empirical data. Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 14: 123–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Rud Nielsen, Jens. 1972. Niels Bohr. Collected Works, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland

  • Rud Nielsen, Jens. 1976. Niels Bohr. Collected Works, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1923. The ABC of Atoms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul

  • Schott, George A. 1918. On Bohr’s hypothesis of stationary states of motion and the radiation from an accelerated electron. Philos. Mag. 36: 243–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberstein, Ludwik. 1920. Report on the Quantum Theory of Spectra. London: Adam Hilger

  • Smekal, Adolf. 1921. Über Stark’s Kritik der Bohrschen Theorie der Lichtemission. Verh. Deutsch. Phys. Gesells. 2: 20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, Arnold. 1921. Zur Kritik der Bohrschen Theorie der Licht-Emission. Jahrb. Rad. Elektr. 17: 417–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, Arnold. 1924. Grundlagen der Quantentheorie und des Bohrschen Atommodelles. Naturwissenschaften 12: 1047–1049

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Johannes. 1914. Elektrische Spektralanalyse Chemischer Atome. Leipzig: Hirzel

  • Stark, Johannes. 1916. Tatsachen und Folgerungen über Zahl und Koppelung von Elektronen im Wasserstoffatom. Ann. Phys. 50: 53–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Johannes. 1917. Erfahrung und Bohrsche Theorie der Wasserstoffspektren. Ann. Phys. 54: 111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Johannes. 1920. Zur Kritik der Bohrschen Theorie der Lichtemission. Jahrb. Rad. Elektr. 17: 161–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Johannes. 1922. Die Gegenwärtige Krisis in der Deutschen Physik. Leipzig: J. A. Barth

  • Stark, Johannes. 1930. Die Kausalität im Verhalten des Elektrons. Ann. Phys. 6: 681–699

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Johannes. 1945. Erinnerungen eines Deutschen Naturforschers, edited and annotated by Andreas Kleinert. Mannheim: Bionomica-Verlag

  • Stolzenburg, Klaus. 1984. Niels Bohr. Collected Works, Vol. 5. Amsterdam: North-Holland

  • Thomson, Joseph J. 1919. On the origin of spectra and Planck’s law. Philos. Mag. 37: 419–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, Richard C. 1922. Review of the present status of the two forms of quantum theory. J. Opt. Soc. Am. Rev. Sci. Instr. 6: 211–228

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, Emil. 1913. Bemerkungen zu der Aufspaltung der Spektrallinien im elektrischen Feld. Verh. Deutsch. Physik. Gesells. 15: 1259–1266

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, Andrew. 1993. Frequency, theorem and formula: Remembering Joseph Larmor in electromagnetic theory. Notes and Records Roy. Soc. 47: 49–60

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wereide, Thorstein. 1915. Statistical Theory of Energy and Matter. Oslo: Gyldendal

  • Wereide, Thorstein. 1917. Maxwells Gleichungen und die Atomstrahlung. Ann. Phys. 52: 276–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, Edmund T. 1922. On the quantum mechanism in the atom. Proc. Roy. Soc., Edinburgh 42: 129–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Wien, Wilhelm. 1915. Theorie der Wärmestrahlung. In Physik, Part 3.3.1 of Die Kultur der Gegenwart, edited by Emil Warburg, pp. 209–222. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Science Studies, Aarhus University, Building 1110, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark

    Helge Kragh

Authors
  1. Helge Kragh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helge Kragh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kragh, H. Conceptual objections to the Bohr atomic theory — do electrons have a “free will” ?. EPJ H 36, 327–352 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2011-20031-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2011-20031-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation