Skip to main content
Log in

Interactions of relativistic heavy ions in thick heavy element targets and some unresolved problems

  • Published:
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interactions of relativistic heavy ions with total energies above 30 GeV in thick Cu and Pb targets (≥ 2 cm) have been studied with various techniques. Radiochemical irradiation experiments using thick Cu targets, both in a compact form or as diluted “2π-Cu targets” have been carried out with several relativistic heavy ions, such as 44 GeV 12C (JINR, Dubna, Russia) and 72 GeV 40Ar (LBL, Berkeley, USA). Neutron measuring experiments using thick targets irradiated with various relativistic heavy ions up to 44 GeV 12C have been performed at the JINR. In addition, the number of “black prongs” in nuclear interactions (due to protons with energies less than 30 MeV and emitted from the target-like interaction partner at rest) produced with 72 GeV 22Ne ions in nuclear emulsion plates has been measured in the first nuclear interaction of the primary 22Ne ion and in the following second nuclear interaction of the secondary heavy (Z > 1) ion. Some essential results have been obtained. (1) Spallation products produced by relativistic secondary fragments in interactions ([44 GeV 12C or 72 GeV 40Ar] + Cu) within thick copper yield fewer products close to the target and many more products far away from the target as compared to primary beam interactions. This applies also to secondary particles emitted into large angles (Θ > 10°). (2) The neutron production of 44 GeV 12C within thick Cu and Pb targets is beyond the estimated yield as based on experiments with 12 GeV 12C. These rather independent experimental results cannot be understood within well-accepted nuclear reaction models. They appear to present unresolved problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Brandt, “Do We Really Understand Nuclear Reactions within Thick Targets Using GeV-Hadrons?,” Radiat. Meas. 36, 249–259 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Lerman, “On the Symmetry of Nuclear Identity between Relativistic Primary and Secondary Nuclei,” PhD Thesis (Philipps-Universität, 2002).

  3. M. Ochs, “Experiment on Neutron Emission in Fission Reaction in Massive Copper and Lead Targets,” PhD Thesis ISBN 3-89703-050-0 (Philipps-University, Marburg, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Brandt et al., “Search for New Phenomena in High-Energy Heavy Ion Interactions,” Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas. 15, 383–392 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Brandt et al., “Wide Angle Emission of Heavy Fragments in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions and Some Open Problems,” Nucl. Track Radiat. Meas. 22, 537–546 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Brandt et al., “Enhanced Production of 24Na by Wide-Angle Secondaries Produced in the Interaction of Relativistic Carbon Ions with Copper,” Phys. Rev. C 45, 1194–1208 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Heck, “Wide Angle Emission of High Energy Secondary Particles from Interaction of Relativistic Heavy Ions with Copper Targets,” PhD Thesis (Philipps-Universität, Marburg, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Pille, “Investigation of Behavior of Light Relativistic Projectiles,” PhD Thesis (Technische Hochschule Leipzig, 1989).

  9. R. Brandt et al., “Further Evidences for Enhanced Nuclear Cross-Sections Observed in 44 GeV Carbon Ion Interactions with Copper,” JINR Preprint El-95-502 (Dubna, 1995).

  10. R. G. Vassilkov et al., “Neutron Yields from Extended Lead Targets under Action of Relativistic Ions,” Atomic Energy 79, 257–264 (1995); R. G. Vassilkov et al., “On Electronuclear Breading,” Usp. Fiz. Nauk 139, 435 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Brandt, “Some Contributions from SSNTD towards Nuclear Science; from Multi-Fragmentation towards Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS),” Radiat. Meas. 34, 211–219 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Brandt et al., “Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS) for Transmutation and Energy Production: Their Challenges and Dangers,” Kerntechnik 69, 37–50 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. A. Ditlov et al., “Study of Number of Black Prongs for Two Generations After Nuclear-Nuclear Interactions of 72 GeV 22Ne in Nuclear Emulsion,” in Proc. of the 22nd Intern. Conf. on Nuclear Tracks in Solids, Barcelona, Spain, Aug. 23–27 2004 (2004).

  14. J. B. Cumming et al., “Spallation of Copper by 80 GeV 40Ar Ions,” Phys. Rev. C 17, 1632–1641 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. E. M. Friedlander and A. Friedman, “Frequency Distribution of Heavy Prongs from High-Energy Stars in Nuclear Emulsions,” Nuovo Cim. A 52, 912–917 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. E. M. Friedlander et al., “Anomalous Reaction Mean Free Path of Projectile Fragments from Heavy Ion Collisions at 2 A GeV,” Phys. Rev. C 27, 1489 (1983).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Ganssauge, “The Experimental Status of the Anomalon Research,” Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas. 15, 371 (1988); Annal. der Physik 44, 202–246 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Dutta et al., “Charge Fragmentation in Cosmic Radiation and the Question of Physical Anomalons,” Kerntechnik 68, 219–222 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. S. Hendricks et al., MCNPX Version 2.5.e, LA-UR-04-0569 (Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2004).

  20. G. Dersch et al., “Unusual Behavior of Projectile Fragments from the Interaction of Copper with Relativistic Ar Ions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1176–1179 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Aleklett et al., “Unusual Interaction of Projectile Fragments Produced by Relativistic Ar Ions in Copper,” Preprint LBL-22422 (1987); Phys. Rev. C 38, 1658–1673 (1988); Erratum: Phys. Rev. C 44, 566 (1991).

  22. T. Lund et al., “Charge and Mass Distribution of Products from the Nuclear Interaction between Copper and 1 GeV 12C,” Phys. Lett. B 102, 239–241 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Polanski, A. N. Sosnin, and V. D. Toneev, JINR Preprint E2-91-562 (Dubna, 1991).

  24. G. Haase, “Nuclear Chemical Investigation of Nontypical Wide Angle Behavior of Secondary Particles in Relativistic Heavy Ion Reactions,” PhD Thesis (Philipps-Universität, Marburg, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Y.-L. Wang, “Study of Neutron Emission from Massive Targets at Irradiation with Relativistic Heavy Ions by Nuclear Emulsions and Nuclear Track Detectors,” PhD Thesis (Advanced Research Institute for Science, Waseda University, Tokyo, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Brandt, “Information Concept of Szilard and Unger and Two Basic Thermodynamic Postulates in Elementary Particle Research,” Math. Phys. Korresp. Nr. 220, ISSN 1661-0563 (2005), pp. 3–17.

  27. R. Brandt, “Measurements of Neutron Yields and Radioactive Isotope Transmutation in Collisions of Relativistic Ions with Heavy Nuclei,” JINR Preprint El-99-251 (Dubna, 1999).

  28. M. Ochs et al., “SSNTD and Radiochemical Studies on the Transmutation of Nuclei Using Relativistic Ions,” Radiat. Meas. 28, 255–268 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. E. M. Friedlander and H. H. Heckmann, “Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions: Experiment,” Preprint LBL-13864; Heavy Ion Science (Plenum Press, 1983).

  30. K. D. Tolstov, “Complete Destruction of Heavy Nuclei by Hadrons and Nuclei,” Z. Phys. A: Atoms and Nuclei 301, 339–342 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. H. A. Khan et al., “Exceptionally High Multiplicity Events Observed in the Interaction of Relativistic Uranium Ions with Light Target Atoms,” Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 61, 497–501 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. B. A. Arbuzov et al., “On the SSNTD in Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics and the Study of Open Questions,” Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas. 19, 557–567 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. B. A. Kulakov et al., “On the Different Experimental Behavior of Fast Particles Produced in 12C Interactions at Relativistic Energies,” JINR Preprint El-98-51 (Dubna, 1998); Kerntechnik 63, 249–254 (1998).

  34. K. D. Tolstov, “On the Anomalon Interpretation of 40Ar + Cu Collisions at 0.9 and 1.8 A GeV,” JINR Rapid Commun. 21, 27 (1987); Z. Physik A 333, 79 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  35. G. Dersch et al., “On the Anomalon Interpretation of 40Ar + Cu Collisions at 0.9 and 1.8 A GeV,” Isotopenpraxis 27, 303–304 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The text was submitted by the authors in English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brandt, R., Ditlov, V.A., Dwivedi, K.K. et al. Interactions of relativistic heavy ions in thick heavy element targets and some unresolved problems. Phys. Part. Nuclei 39, 259–285 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779608020044

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779608020044

PACS numbers

Navigation