Skip to main content
Log in

Gently sloping shear zones in the Belomorian Mobile Belt: Geology, structure, and PT parameters

  • Published:
Geotectonics Aims and scope

Abstract

The Belomorian Mobile Belt (BMB) in northern Karelia mostly consists of gently sloping shear zones, whose gneisses and migmatized amphibolites and blastomylonites are typically thinly banded, with their banding consistently dipping north- and northeastward. These gently sloping shear zones were not affected by folding after they were produced and are not cut by Paleoproterozoic metabasite dikes. Intrusive metabasites in the gently sloping shear zones make up relatively small (usually <5 m) equant or elongate bodies and occur as fragments of larger bodies. These fragments are often concentrated in stripes. Metabasites in the gently sloping shear zone are sometimes also found as lenses and tabular bodies of relatively small thickness, which are conformable with the foliation of the host rocks. The gently sloping shear zones cut across older domains of more complicated structure, which suggests that these zones are gently sloping ductile shear zones. Along these zones, the nappes were thrust south- and southwestward, and this process was the last in the origin of major structural features of BMB when the Paleoproterozoic Lapland–Kola orogen was formed. Practically identical age values were obtained for the gently sloping shear zone in the two widely separated Engonozero and Chupa segments of BMB: 1879 ± 21 Ma (40Ar/39Ar amphibole age of amphibolite whose protolith was mafic rock) and 1857 ± 13 Ma (Sm–Nd mineral isochron age of garnet amphibolites after gabbronorite). The PT metamorphic parameters in these gently sloping shear zones are remarkably different from the metamorphic parameters outside these zones: the pressure is 3–4 kbar lower and the temperature is 60–100°C lower. Thrusting-related decompression triggered the transition from the older high-pressure episode of Paleoproterozoic metamorphism to a younger syn-thrusting higher temperature metamorphic episode. The peak metamorphic parameters corresponding to the boundary between the amphibolite and granulite facies were reached only in the central portions of the shear zones: T= 680–760°C, P = 8.0–11.9 kbar. In areas of the most intense migmatization, temperature estimates in the central portions of the shear are as high as 810–830°C. The marginal portions of the shear zones were formed at lower temperatures of 610–630°C. The temperature heterogeneous and rock heating in the gently sloping shear zones may have resulted from flows of high-temperature metamorphic fluid that were focused to the central portions of the zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Ya. Azimov and S. A. Bushmin, “P–T History of the HT/HP granulite metamorphism associated with thrusting in a junction zone between the Porya Guba and Umba blocks, Lapland Granulite Belt (northeastern Baltic Shield),” Dokl. Earth Sci. 425, 393–397 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. V. V. Balaganskii, Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Geology and Mineralogy (St. Petersburg, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. V. Berezin, V. V. Travin, Yu. B. Marin, S. G. Skublov, and E. S. Bogomolov, “New U–Pb and Sm–Nd ages and P–T estimates for eclogitization in the Fe-rich gabbro dyke in Gridino area (Belomorian Mobile Belt),” Dokl. Earth Sci. 444, 760–765 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. V. Berezin, S. G. Skublov, Yu. B. Marin, A. E. Mel’nik, and E. S. Bogomolov, “New occurrence of eclogite in the Belomorian Mobile Belt: Geology, metamorphic conditions, and isotope age,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 448, 43–54 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E. V. Bibikova, S. V. Bogdanova, V. A. Glebovitsky, S. Claesson, and T. Skiöld, “Evolution of the Belomorian Belt: NORDSIM U–Pb zircon dating of the Chupa paragneisses, magmatism, and metamorphic stages,” Petrology 12, 195–210 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. V. Bibikova, S. Claesson, V. A. Glebovitsky, I. S. Sedova, and A. M. Ruch’ev, “Isotope dating of the Svecofennian metamorphism of the Belomorian Belt, Baltic Shield,” Geochem Int. 39, 1023–1026 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. A. Glebovitskii, Yu. V. Miller, G. M. Drugova, R. I. Mil’kevich, and A. B. Vrevskii, “The structure and metamorphism of the Belomoride–Lapland collision zone,” Geotectonics 30, 53–63 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. L. Grodnitskii, Granitic Pegmatites of the Baltic Shield (Nauka, Leningrad, 1982) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. A. Dokukina, T. B. Bayanova, T. V. Kaulina, A. V. Travin, and A. N. Konilov, “New geochronological data on metamorphic and igneous rocks from the Gridino village area (Belomorian Eclogitic Province),” Dokl. Earth Sci. 432, 671–676 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. V. M. Kozlovsky, “Structural-material geological complexes comprising the islands of Kem’-Luda Archipelago and the coastal zone of the continent,” in The Natural Chronicle of the Kandalaksha Natural Reserve for 2010 (Izd. Kandalaksh. Zapov., Kandalaksha, 2011. Vol. 1, pp. 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. M. Kozlovsky and L. Ya. Aranovich, “Geological and structural conditions of eclogitization of Paleoproterozoic basic dikes in the Eastern Belomorian Mobile Belt,” Geotectonics 42, 305–317 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. V. M. Kozlovskii and L. Ya. Aranovich, “Petrology and thermobarometry of eclogite rocks in the Krasnaya Guba dike field, Belomorian Mobile Belt,” Petrology 18, 27–49 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. V. M. Kozlovskii and A. A. Viryus, “Autochthonous granitoid fusions in fluid-saturated suture zones of the Belomorian Mobile Belt,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 437, 522–526 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. V. M. Kozlovsky and V. L. Rusinov, “Transformation of amphibolites and fractal dimension of migmatites of the Belomorian Complex as evidence for synchronism and periodicity of shear deformation and migmatization,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 419, 511–515 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. M. Kozlovskii, L. Ya. Aranovich, and N. I. Frishman, “Prograde transformations of amphibolites into eclogites and eclogite-like rocks in the low-pressure field of the eclogite facies (by the example of the Belomorian Mobile Belt),” Russ. Geol. Geophys. 56, 709–728 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V. M. Kozlovskii, L. B. Terent’eva, V. M. Savatenkov, and Ya. V. Bychkova, “Geochemistry, age, and formation environments of eclogitized low-Ti tholeiite dikes in the eastern part of the Belomorian Mobile Belt,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 463, 795–801 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Yu. Kolodyazhny, Structural-Kinematic Evolution of the Southeastern Baltic Shield in the Paleoproterozoic (GEOS, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. P. Korikovsky, A. B. Kotov, E. B. Sal’nikova, L. Ya. Aranovich, D. I. Korpechkov, S. Z. Yakovleva, E. V. Tolmacheva, and I. V. Anisimova, “The age of the protolith of metamorphic rocks in the southeastern part of the Lapland Granulite Belt, southern Kola Peninsula: Correlation with the Belomorian Mobile Belt in the context of the problem of Archean eclogites,” Petrology 22, 91–108 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T. L. Larikova, “Genesis of drusitic (corona) textures around olivine and orthopyroxene during metamorphism of gabbroids in northern Belomorie, Karelia,” Petrology 8, 384–402 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yu. V. Miller and R. I. Mil’kevich, “Folded nappe structure of the Belomorsk zone and its relation to the Karelian granite-greenstone belts,” Geotectonics 29, 520–531 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Early Precambrian of the Baltic Shield, Ed. by V. A. Glebovitsky (Nauka, St. Petersburg, 2005) [in Russian].

  22. S. G. Skublov, A. E. Mel’nik, Yu. B. Marin, A. V. Berezin, E. S. Bogomolov, and F. I. Ishmurzin, “New data on the age (U–Pb, Sm–Nd) of metamorphism and a protolith of eclogite-like rocks from the Krasnaya Guba area, Belomorian Belt,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 453, 1158–1164 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. I. Slabunov, Geology and Geodynamics of the Archean Mobile Belts: Case Study of the Belomorian Province, Fennoscandian Shield (Karel. Nauchn. Tsentr Ross. Akad. Nauk, Petrozavodsk, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. V. Stepanova, A. N. Larionov, E. V. Bibikova, V. S. Stepanov, and A. I. Slabunov, “Early Proterozoic (2.1 Ga) Fe-Tholeiitic magmatism of the Belomorian Province, Baltic Shield: Geochemistry and geochronology,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 390, 607–610 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  25. V. S. Stepanov, Precambrian Basic Magmatism in the Western White Sea Region (Nauka, Leningrad, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  26. V. S. Stepanov and A. V. Stepanova, “Gridino dike field: Geology, geochemistry, and petrology,” in Belomorian Mobile Belt and Its Analogs (Geology, Geochronology, Geodynamics, and Minerageny): A Guide and Proceedings of the Conference (Karel. Nauchn. Tsentr Ross. Akad. Nauk, Petrozavodsk, 2005), pp. 285–288.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Structure and Dynamics of the Lithosphere of Eastern Europe, Ed. by N. I. Pavlenkova (Geokart, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

  28. E. N. Terekhov, Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Geology and Mineralogy (Moscow, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. N. Terekhov and A. S. Baluev, “Post-folding magmatism (1.85–1.7 Ga) in the eastern part of the Baltic Shield: Correlation of its structural position and evolution of surrounding complexes,” Stratigr. Geol. Correl. 19, 600–617 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. V. M. Timofeev, Geological Map of Karelia (ONTI NKTP SSSR, Leningrad, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. V. Travin, D. S. Yudin, A. G. Vladimirov, S. V. Khromykh, N. I. Volkova, A. S. Mekhonoshin, and T. B. Kolotilina, “Thermochronology of the Chernorud granulite zone, Ol’khon Region, Western Baikal area,” Geochem. Int. 47, 1107–1124 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. V. V. Travin, “The structural position and age of eclogite rocks in the area of Gridino village in the Belomorian Mobile Belt,” Geotectonics 49, 425–438 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. V. V. Travin, V. S. Stepanov, and K. A. Dokukina, “Characterictics and formation conditions of tectonites on the Izbnaya Luda Island in Gridino village area, northwestern White Sea Region,” in Vol. 8 of Geology and Mineral Resources of Karelia (Karel. Nauchn. Tsentr Ross. Akad. Nauk, Petrozavodsk, 2005), pp. 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. I. Tugarinov and E. V. Bibikova, Geochronology of the Baltic Shield from Zircon-Based Measurements (Nauka, Moscow, 1980) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. V. Sharkov, I. S. Krassivskaya, and A. V. Chistyakov, “Dispersed mafic–ultramafic intrusive magmatism in Early Paleoproterozoic mobile zones of the Baltic Shield: An example of the Belomorian drusite (coronite) complex,” Petrology 12, 561–582 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  36. T. F. Shcherbakova, Amphibolites of the Belomorian Complex and Their Granitization (Nauka, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  37. L. Ya. Aranovich and R. G. Berman, “Optimized standard state and solution properties of minerals: II. Comparisons, predictions, and applications,” Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 126, 25–37 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. R. G. Berman and L. Ya. Aranovich, “Optimized standard state and solution properties of minerals: I. Model calibration for olivine, orthopyroxene, cordierite, garnet, and ilmenite in the system FeO–MgO–CaO–Al2O3–TiO2–SiO2,” Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 126, 1–24 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. R. G. Berman, L. Y. Aranovich, and D. R. M. Pattison, “Reassessment of the garnet-clinopyroxene Fe–Mg exchange thermometer: II. Thermodynamic analysis,” Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 119, 30–42 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. R. G. Berman, “Thermobarometry using multiequilibrium calculations: A new technique with petrologic applications,” Can. Mineral. 29, 833–855 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  41. T. M. Harrison, “Diffusion of 40Ar in hornblende,” Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 78, 324–331 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. K. V. Hodges, “Geochronology and thermochronology in orogenic systems,” in Treatise on Geochemistry (Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2004), pp. 263–292.

    Google Scholar 

  43. U. K. Mader and R. G. Berman, “Amphibole thermobarometry: A thermodynamic approach,” Curr. Res. Geol. Surv. Can. 92 (1E), 393–400 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  44. J. G. Ramsay and M. I. Huber, The Techniques of Modern Structural Geology, Vol. 2: Folds and Fractures (Academic Press, London, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. M. Kozlovskii.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.M. Kozlovskii, V.V. Travin, D.I. Korpechkov, M.N. Zaitseva, E.B. Kurdyukov, A.V. Travin, L.B. Terent’eva, V.M. Savatenkov, 2016, published in Geotektonika, 2016, No. 6, pp. 52–74.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kozlovskii, V.M., Travin, V.V., Korpechkov, D.I. et al. Gently sloping shear zones in the Belomorian Mobile Belt: Geology, structure, and PT parameters. Geotecton. 50, 579–597 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852116060042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852116060042

Keywords

Navigation