Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in the development of the initial phase of the formation of two types of coronal mass ejections

  • Published:
Cosmic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the results of an analysis of AIA/SDO and EUVI/STEREO data it was confirmed that the initial phase of the “gradual” coronal mass ejection (CME) begins as a motion from the rest of the outer shell of a coronal magnetic rope, which then becomes the basis of the frontal structure of a CME. It is shown by an example of an analysis of an event on January 5, 2013 that a different type of CME, “impulsive,” can occur as a result of the ejection of a “cavity” from the lower solar corona (the 193 Å channel), which then becomes the basis for future CME. An analysis of the three-dimensional structure of the cavity, its dynamics and kinematics, as well as a comparison of the results of an analysis with numerical calculations allow us to interpret observations as a manifestation of the rapid rise of the magnetic tube (rope) filled with cold plasma. The appearance of the rope in the lower corona probably is a result of its rapid floating (with supersonic velocity) from the solar convective zone. Theoretical estimates show that the cause of the ejection of the magnetic tube from the convective zone can be the development of a Parker’s instability (“slow” wave).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patsourakos, S., Vourlidas, A., and Stenborg, G., Direct evidence for a fast coronal mass ejection driven by the prior formation and subsequent destabilization of a magnetic flux rope, Astrophys. J., 2013, vol. 764, p. 125. doi: 10.1099/0004-637X/764/2/125C

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eselevich, V.G., Eselevich, M.V., Romanov, V.A., et al., Physical mechanism of generation of coronal mass ejections from upper layers of the convective zone, Izv. Krymskoi Astrofiz. Obs., vol. 109, no. 3 pp. 1–7.

  3. Eselevich, V.G. and Eselevich, M.V., Physical distinctions in the initial phase of formation of two types of coronal mass ejections, Astron. Zh., 2014, vol. 91, no. 4 pp. 320–331.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hundhausen, A.J., Coronal mass ejections: a summary of SMM observations from 1980 and 1984–1989, in The Many Faces of Sun: Scientific Highlights of the Solar Maximum Mission, Strong, K.T., Saba, J.T. and Haisch, B.M., Eds., Preprint of High Altitude Observatory National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO. Published by Springer, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sheeley, N.R., Jr., Walter, H., Wang, Y.-M., et al., Continuous tracking of coronal outflows: Two kinds of coronal mass ejections, J. Geophys. Res., 1999, vol. 104 pp. 24739–24768.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bemporad, A., Raymond, J., Poletto, G., et al., A comprehensive study of the initiation and early evolution of a coronal mass ejection from ultraviolet and white-light data, Astrophys. J., 2007, vol. 655 pp. 576–590.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eselevich, V.G. and Eselevich, M.V., On the formation mechanism of the sporadic solar wind, Geomagn. Aeron., 2011, vol. 51, no. 8 pp. 1083–1094.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Romanov, D.V. and Romanov, V.A., Floating-up of magnetic flux from relaxation zone the photospheric level, Astron. Zh., 1993, vol. 70 pp. 134–140.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grigor’ev, V.M, Ermakova, L.V, and Khlystova, A.I., Dynamics of radial velocities and magnetic field in the photosphere of the Sun at origination of a powerful active region, Pis’ma Astron. Zh., 2007, vol. 33 pp. 858–862.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Borrero, J.M., Martinez-Pillet, V., Schlichenmair, R., et al., Supersonic magnetic upflows in granular cells observed with Sunrise/Imax, Astrophys. J., 2010, vol. 723 pp. L144–L148.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Romanov, V.A., Romanov, D.V., and Romanov, K.V., Discharge of magnetic fields from the dynamo zone to the solar atmosphere, Astron. Zh., 1993, vol. 70 pp. 1237–1246.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fan, Y., Magnetic fields in the solar convection zone, Living Rev. Solar Phys., 2009, vol. 6, p. 4.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Romanov, D.V. and Romanov, K.V., Numerical simulation of dynamical processes in the solar atmosphere, Vych. Tekhnologii, 2003, vol. 8, no. 6 pp. 74–95.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Fan, Y., Nonlinear growth of the three-dimensional undular instability of a horizontal magnetic layer and the formation of arching flux tubes, Astrophys. J., 2001, vol. 546, p. 509.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lemen, J.R., Title, A.M., Akin, D.J., et al., The atmospheric imaging assembly (AIA) on the solar dynamics observatory (SDO), Solar Physics, 2012, vol. 275, p. 17.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwenn, R., Dal Lago, A., Huttunen, E., et al., The association of coronal mass ejections with their effects near the Earth, Ann. Geophys., 2005, vol. 23 pp. 1033–1059.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. G. Eselevich.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.G. Eselevich, M.V. Eselevich, 2015, published in Kosmicheskie Issledovaniya, 2015, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 24–34.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eselevich, V.G., Eselevich, M.V. Differences in the development of the initial phase of the formation of two types of coronal mass ejections. Cosmic Res 53, 21–30 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952515010049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952515010049

Keywords

Navigation