Skip to main content
Log in

Randomized local search for the discrete competitive facility location problem

  • Two-Level Programming Problems
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consider a finite set of consumers that two competing companies are willing to service. The companies open facilities one by one. The set of locations available to open facilities is finite. The problem is to find a facility location for the first company that maximizes its profit given that the second company also makes its decision by maximizing the profit. We propose a randomized local search scheme that employs an internal local search procedure to estimate the solutions being enumerated. Numerical experiments with random input data show that the scheme is able to find high quality approximate solutions for examples with dimension that has not been amenable to previously known algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krarup, J. and Pruzan, P.M., The Simple Plant Location Problem: Survey and Synthesis, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1983, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 36–81.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Kononov, A.V., Kochetov, Y.A., and Plyasunov, A.V., Competitive Facility Location Models, Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 2009, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 994–1009.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Canovas, L., Garcia, S., Labbe, M., and Marin, A., A Strengthened Formulation for the Simple Plant Location Problem with Order, Oper. Res. Lett., 2007, vol. 35, pp. 141–150.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Vasil’ev, I.L. and Klimentova, K.B., The Branch and Cut Method for the Facility Location Problem with Client’s Preferences, J. Appl. Ind. Math., 2010, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 441–454.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Labbe, M. and Hakimi, S.L., Market and Locational Equilibrium for Two Competitors, Oper. Res., 1991, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 749–756.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Rhim, H., Ho, T.H., and Karmarkar, U.S., Competitive Location, Production, and Market Selection, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2003, vol. 149, pp. 211–228.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Perez, M.D.G., Hernandez, P.F., and Pelegrin, B., On Price Competition in Location-Price Models with Spatially Separated Markets, Top, 2004, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 351–374.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Stackelberg, H., The Theory of the Market Economy, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hakimi, S.L., Locations with Spatial Interactions: Competitive Locations and Games, in Discrete Location Theory, Mirchandani, P.B. and Francis, R.L., Eds., London: Wiley, 1990, pp. 439–478.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alekseeva, E., Kochetova, N., Kochetov, Y., and Plyasunov, A., Heuristic and Exact Methods for the Discrete (r|p)-Centroid Problem, Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., Berlin: Springer, 2010, vol. 6022, pp. 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spoerhose, J., Competitive and Voting Location, PhD Dissertation, Univ. of Wurzburg, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dobson, G. and Karmarkar, U., Competitive Location on Network, Oper. Res., 1987, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 65–74.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Beresnev, V.L., Upper Bounds for Objective Functions of Discrete Competitive Facility Location Problems, J. Appl. Ind. Math., 2009, vol. 3, pp. 419–432.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Beresnev, V.L. and Melnikov, A.A., Approximate Algorithms for Competitive Facility Location Problem, J. Appl. Ind. Math., 2011, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 180–190.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Beresnev, V.L., Goncharov, E.N., and Mel’nikov, A.A., Local Search with a Generalized Neighborhood in the Optimization Problem for Pseudo-Boolean Functions, J. Appl. Ind. Math., 2012, no. 1, pp. 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kernigan, B.W. and Lin, S., An Efficient Heuristic Procedure for Partitioning Graphs, Bell Syst. Tech. J., 1970, vol. 49, pp. 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Discrete Location Problems: Benchmark Library, http://math.nsc.ru/AP/benchmarks/index.html.

  18. Yao, A., Probabilistic Computations: Toward a Unified Measure of Complexity, Proc. 18th IEEE Symp. on Foundat. Comput. Sci. (FOCS), 1977, pp. 222–227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Mel’nikov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.A. Mel’nikov, 2014, published in Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, 2014, No. 4, pp. 134–152.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mel’nikov, A.A. Randomized local search for the discrete competitive facility location problem. Autom Remote Control 75, 700–714 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117914040109

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117914040109

Keywords

Navigation