B. F. Aparin, M. I. Gerasimova, I. I. Lebedeva, et al., “Verification of the Classification and Diagnostic System of Russian Soils (2004) on the Materials of a Collection of Soil Monoliths from the V.V. Dokuchaev Central Soil Museum,” Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 525–531 (2007) [Eur. Soil Sci. 40 (5), 478–484 (2007)].
A. G. Zavarzina and V. V. Demin, “Acid-Base Properties of Humic Acids of Different Origin as Seen from the Potentiometric Titration Data,” Pochvovedenie, No. 10, 1246–1254 (1999) [Eur. Soil Sci. 32 (10), 1115–1122 (1999)].
M. E. Ivanova, G. G. Morkovkin, S. B. Tarasova, and D. A. Tailashev, “Study of the Fractional Composition of Humus in Leached Chernozems of Meadow Steppes under Different Anthropogenic Loads in the Altai Region,” in Humic Substances in the Biosphere (Moscow, 2007), pp. 247–253 [in Russian].
A. M. Kvasova, I. N. Kurganova, V. O. Gerenyu, et al., “Effect of Land Use on the Humus State and Respiration Activity of Gray Forest Soils,” in Humic Substances in the Biosphere (Moscow, 2007), pp. 260–264 [in Russian].
I. N. Kurganova, A. M. Ermolaev, V. O. Gerenyu, et al., “Fluxes and Pools of Carbon in Fallow Soils of Moscow Region,” in Soil Processes and the Spatial-Temporal Organization of Soils
(Nauka, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].Google Scholar
E. D. Lodygin, V. A. Beznosikov, and S. N. Chukov, Structural-Functional Parameters of Humic Substances in Podzolic and Bog-Podzolic Soils
(Nauka, St. Petersburg, 2007) [in Russian].Google Scholar
Methods of Stationary Soil Studies (Nauka, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].
D. S. Orlov, Soil Chemistry
(Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].Google Scholar
A. I. Pozdnyakov, N. G. Kovalev, and A. D. Pozdnyakova, Electrophysics in Soil Science, Land Reclamation, and Farming
(ChuDo, Tver’-Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].Google Scholar
O. G. Rastvorova, Soil Physics (Practical Guide)
(Leningr. Gos. Univ., Leningrad, 1983) [in Russian].Google Scholar
A. A. Romanovskaya and T. G. Arakelyan, “Soil Organic Carbon in Fallow Soils of Moscow Oblast,” in Humic Substances in the Biosphere (Moscow, 2007), pp. 618–626 [in Russian].
A. A. Stepanov and N. I. Sukhanova, “Changes in the Molecular-Mass Distribution and Amphiphily of Humic Substances on an Ordinary Calcareous Chernozem in the Course of Natural Restoration of Steppe Vegetation,” in Humic Substances in the Biosphere (Moscow, 2007), pp. 86–94 [in Russian].
N. I. Sukhanova, I. N. Kurganova, V. O. Lopes de Gerenyu, and V. V. Kerimzade, “Changes in the Organic Carbon Content and Respiration Activity of an Ordinary Chernozem under the Impact of Overgrowing with Natural Vegetation,” in Humic Substances in the Biosphere (Moscow, 2007), pp. 310–314 [in Russian].
S. N. Chukov, Structural-Functional Parameters of Soil Organic Matter under Anthropogenic Loads
(Izd. St.-Peterb. Univ., St. Petersburg, 2001) [in Russian].Google Scholar
C. Cerli, L. Celi, K. Kaiser, et al., “Changes in Humic Substances along an Age Sequence of Norway Spruce Stands Planted on Former Agricultural Land,” Org. Geochem. No. 39, 1269–1280 (2008).
S. Chukov, “Evolution of Soil Humic Substances,” in From Molecular Understanding to Innovate Applications of Humic Substances (Proc. 14th Int. Meeting of the Int. Humic Substances Soc., Sept. 14–19, St. Petersburg, Russia) (Moscow, 2008), Vol. I, 145–148.
P. Conte and A. Piccolo, B. van Lagen, P. Buurman, and M. A. Hemmingaz, “Elemental Quantitation of Natural Organic Matter by CPMAS 13CNMR Spectroscopy,” Solid State Nucl. Magn. Resonance, No. 21, 158–170 (2002).
R. Jandl, M. Lindner, L. Vesterdal, et al., “How Strongly Can Forest Management Influence Soil Carbon Sequestration?,” Geoderma, No. 137, 253–268 (2007).
L.-S. Koutika, N. Sanginga, B. Vanlauwe, and S. Weise, “Chemical Properties and Soil Organic Matter Assessment under Fallow Systems in Forest Margins Benchmark,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 34
, 757–765 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A. A. Larionova, L. N. Rozonova, I. V. Yevdokimov, et al., “Land-Use Change and Management Effects on Carbon Sequestration in Soils of Russia’s South Taiga Zone,” Tellus 55, 331–337.
J. D. Liao, T. W. Boutton, and J. D. Jastrow, “Storage and Dynamics of Carbon and Nitrogen in Soil Physical Fractions Following Woody Plant Invasion of Grassland,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 38
, 3184–3196 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
W. M. Post and K. C. Kwon, “Soil Carbon Sequestration and Land Use Change: Processes and Potential,” Global Change Biol. 6
, 317–327 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. R. Poulton, E. Pye, P. R. Hargreaves, and D. S. Jenkinson, “Accumulation of Carbon and Nitrogen by Old Arable Land Reverting to Woodland,” Global Change Biol. 9
, 942–955 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R. Spaccini, J. S. C. Mbagwu, P. Conte, and A. Piccolo, “Changes of Humic Substances Characteristics from Forested to Cultivated Soils in Ethiopia,” Geoderma, No. 132, 9–19 (2006).
R. L. Wershaw, “Application of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for Determining Functionality in Humic Substances,” in Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment, and Water
(Wiley, New York, 1985), pp. 561–582.Google Scholar
A. L. Wright, F. Dou, and F. M. Hons, “Soil Organic C and N Distribution for Wheat Cropping Systems after 20 Years of Conservation Tillage in Central Texas,” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 121
, 376–382 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bin Zhang and Xin-Hua Penc, “Organic Matter Enrichment and Aggregate Stabilization in a Severely Degraded Ultisol after Reforestation,” Pedosphere, 16
(6), 699–706 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar