Skip to main content
Log in

The truth about the energy-momentum tensor and pseudotensor

  • Published:
Gravitation and Cosmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The operational and canonical definitions of an energy-momentum tensor (EMT) are considered as well as the tensor and nontensor conservation laws. It is shown that the canonical EMT contradicts the experiments and the operational definition, the Belinfante-Rosenfeld procedure worsens the situation, and the nontensor “conservation laws” are meaningless. A definition of the 4-momentum of a system demands a translator since integration of vectors is meaningless. The mass of a fluid sphere is calculated. It is shown that, according to the standard energy-momentum pseudotensor, the mass-energy of a gravitational field is positive. This contradicts the idea of a negative gravitational energy and discredits the pseudotensor. And what is more, integral 4-pseudovectors are meaningless in general since reference frames for their components are not determined even for coordinates which are Minkowskian at infinity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. C. Tolman, Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology (Oxford, Clarendon 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. I. Khrapko, Classical spin in space with and without torsion, Grav. Cosmol. 10, 91 (2004); http://khrapkori.wmsite.ru/ftpgetfile.php?id=18&module=files

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields (Pergamon, N. Y., 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. A. Schouten, Tensor Analysis for Physicists (Nauka, Moscow, 1965).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. J. A. Schouten, Tensor Analysis for Physicists (Clarendon, Oxford, 1951).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. J. L. Synge, Relativity: The General Theory (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1960).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. P. K. Rashevsky, Riemannian Geometry and Tensor Analysis (Gostekhizdat, Moscow, 1967), p. 304.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. I. Khrapko, Energy-momentum localization and spin, Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Series Physics 10 (1), 35 (2002); http://khrapkori.wmsite.ru/ftpgetfile.php?module=files&id=32

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. I. Khrapko, The Ostrogradsky-Gauss theorem in curved space, Abstracts of the USSR gravitational conference (GR-4, Minsk, 1–3 July 1976), p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. I. Khrapko, Path-dependent functions, Teor. Mat. Fiz. 65(3), 1196 (1985); http://khrapkori.wmsite.ru/ftpgetfile.php?id=19&module=files

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. R. I. Khrapko, Example of creation of matter in a gravitation field, Sov. Phys. JETP 35(3), 441 (1972); http://khrapkori.wmsite.ru/ftpgetfile.php?id=93&module=files

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. R. I. Khrapko, Spin flux gives rise to antisymmetric stress tensor http://mai.ru/publications/index.php?ID=8925 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. J. Belinfante, Physica 6, 887 (1939).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Rosenfeld, Sur le tenseur d’impulsion-energie, Memoires de l’Academie Royale des Sciences de Belgiques 8(6) (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. I. Khrapko, Mechanical stresses produced by a light beam. J. Modern Optics 55, 1487 (2008); http://khrapkori.wmsite.ru/ftpgetfile.php?id=9&module=files

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics (Addison-Wesley, London, 1965), Vol. 3.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. L. I. Mandelshtam, Lectures on Optics, Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics (Nauka, Moscow, 1972), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. H. Ryder, Quantum Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. N. N. Bogoliubov and D. V. Shirkov, Introduction to the Theory of Quantized Fields (GITTL, Moscow, 1957), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. D. Faddeyev, The problem of energy in Einstein’s theory of gravity, Uspekhi Fiz. Nauk 136, 435 (1982).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. M. F. Shirokov, On the materialist essence of relativity, in: Philosophic Problems of Modern Physics (AN SSSR, Moscow, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. I. Khrapko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khrapko, R.I. The truth about the energy-momentum tensor and pseudotensor. Gravit. Cosmol. 20, 264–273 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289314040082

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289314040082

Keywords

Navigation