Skip to main content
Log in

Sex determination in biological specimens using the DYS14 marker

  • Genomics and Transcriptomics
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The applicability of real-time PCR amplification of the chromosome Y marker DYS14 for sex determination was studied. With this aim, real-time PCR of DYS14 (located within the TSPY1-encoding gene) was performed in plasma DNA specimens obtained from 30 men and 30 women. The PCR results showed that 30 specimens were of male and the other 30 were of female origin. All the results were confirmed by the tests for the SRY marker conventionally used in forensic examination. The detection limit for the DYS14-containing DNA region was established in dilution experiments and was equal to 6.7 pg of DNA (two copies of the genome), which corresponds to 6.7 ng of DNA (2000 copies of the genome) in 1 ml of blood. This level of sensitivity allows sex determination in specimens with small amounts of genetic material. The method can be used for noninvasive prenatal diagnostics of sex-linked congenital diseases and in forensic medical examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dadali E.L., Baryshnikova N.V. 2006. Diseases with Unconventional Types of Inheritance. In: Genetika (Genetics). Moscow: Akademkniga, pp. 468–500.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hsu D.T. 2010. Cardiac manifestations of neuromuscular disorders in children. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 11, 35–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dati E., Baldinotti F., Conidi M.E., et al. 2009. A girl with Tomboy behavior: Lesson from misdiagnosis in a baby with ambiguous genitalia. Sex Dev. (in press).

  4. Barkov I.Yu., Bakharev V.A., Karetnikova N.A. 1999. Prenatal sex determination (a review). Probl. Reprod. 1, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Evans M.I., Wapner R.J. 2005. Invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures. Semin. Perinatol. 29, 215–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ajayi G.O. 2009. Chorionic villus sampling: Analysis of the first 350 singleton pregnancies by a single operator. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 36, 251–253.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kong C.W., Leung T.N., Leung T.Y., et al. 2006. Risk factors for procedure-related fetal losses after mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis. Prenatal Diagn. 26, 925–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Willruth A., Vieten J., Berg C., et al. 2010. Decision making and attitudes towards invasive prenatal diagnosis in the early second trimester. Ultraschall. Med. (in press).

  9. Nakata N., Wang Y., Bhatt S. 2010. Trends in prenatal screening and diagnostic testing among women referred for advanced maternal age. Prenatal Diagn. 30, 198–206.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sekido R. 2010. SRY: A transcriptional activator of mammalian testis determination. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 42, 417–420.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zimmermann B.G., Maddocks D.G., Avent N.D. 2008. Quantification of circulatory fetal DNA in the plasma of pregnant women. In: Prenatal Diagnosis). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 219–231.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Floriano-Sánchez E., Cárdenas-Rodríguez N., Castro-Marín M., et al. 2009. DD3(PCA3) gene expression in cancer and prostatic hyperplasia. Clin. Invest. Med. 32, E258.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tamkovich S.N., Vlasov V.V., Laktionov P.P. 2008. Circulating deoxyribonucleic acids in blood and their using in medical diagnostics. Mol. Biol. 42, 12–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Farina A., LeShane E.S., Lambert-Messerlian G.M., et al. 2003. Evaluation of cell-free fetal DNA as a second-trimester maternal serum marker of Down syndrome pregnancy. Clin. Chem. 49, 239–242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhong X.Y., Holzgreve W., Tercanli S., et al. 2006. Cell-free foetal DNA in maternal plasma does not appear to be derived from the rich pool of cell-free foetal DNA in amniotic fluid. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 273, 221–226.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lo Y.M.D. 2008. Fetal nucleic acids in maternal plasma. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1137, 140–143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lo Dennis Y.M., Chiu R.W.K. 2007. Prenatal diagnosis: progress through plasma nucleic acids. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 71–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. G. Blagodatskikh.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.G. Blagodatskikh, A.G. Nikitin, Yu.A. Seregin, K.A. Blagodatskikh, V.V. Nosikov, 2010, published in Molekulyarnaya Biologiya, 2010, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 646–649.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blagodatskikh, E.G., Nikitin, A.G., Seregin, Y.A. et al. Sex determination in biological specimens using the DYS14 marker. Mol Biol 44, 568–570 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893310040102

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893310040102

Key words

Navigation