Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of absorption of multiply scattering media on the degree of residual polarization of backscattered light

  • Physical and Quantum Optics
  • Published:
Optics and Spectroscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of absorption in a scattering medium on the degree of residual polarization of backscattered radiation is studied in the case of probing of multiply scattering media by a linearly polarized light. An approximate expression describing the dependence of the degree of residual linear polarization of the backscattered radiation on the optical characteristics of a multiply scattering medium is derived within the framework of the phenomenological approach, based on the concept of the distribution of the optical paths of partial components of the scattered optical field under the conditions of multiple scattering, and with the use of the ideas about the similarity of statistical moments of the multiply scattered optical fields. The cut-off of the partial components, characterized by a large value of the optical path, because of their absorption, results in a substantial increase of the degree of residual polarization for the bands of the selective absorption caused by the presence of chromophores in the scattering medium. The results of experiments with model scattering media (whole milk) and biological tissues (human skin in vivo) are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. C. Wilson and S. L. Jacques, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 26, 2186 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. T. J. Farrell, B. Wilson, and M. S. Patterson, Phys. Med. Biol. 37, 2281 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Liu, D. A. Boas, Yu. Zhang, et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 40, 1983 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. J. Matcher and C. E. Cooper, Phys. Med. Biol. 39, 1 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. J. Farrell, M. S. Patterson, and B. Wilson, Med. Phys. 19, 879 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Ferrari, Q. Wei, R. A. De Blasi, et al., Proc. SPIE 1888, 466 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. I. V. Meglinskii and S. J. Matcher, Opt. Spektrosk. 91, 692 (2001) [Opt. Spectrosc. 91, 654 (2001)].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. A. Zimnyakov, Opt. Spektrosk. 89, 494 (2000) [Opt. Spectrosc. 89, 453 (2000)].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. A. Zimnyakov, Waves Random Media 10, 417 (2000).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. D. A. Zimnyakov and Yu. P. Sinichkin, Opt. Spektrosk. 91, 113 (2001) [Opt. Spectrosc. 91, 103 (2001)].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Ishimaru, Wave Propagation and Scattering in Random Media (Academic, New York, 1978; Mir, Moscow, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Dogariu, C. Kutsche, P. Likamwa, et al., Opt. Lett. 22, 585 (1997).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. E. Akkermans, P. E. Wolf, R. Maynard, and G. Maret, J. Phys. (Paris) 49, 77 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Bicout, C. Brosseau, A. S. Martinez, and J. M. Schmitt, Phys. Rev. E 49, 1767 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. F. C. MacKintoch, J. X. Zhu, D. J. Pine, and D. A. Weitz, Phys. Rev. B 40, 9342 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Furutsu and Y. Yamada, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3634 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Bassani, F. Martelli, G. Zaccanti, and D. Contini, Opt. Lett. 22, 853 (1997).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Durduran, A. G. Yodh, B. Chance, and D. A. Boas, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 3358 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. P.-A. Lemieux, M. U. Vera, and D. J. Durian, Phys. Rev. E 57, 4498 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Aronson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 2532 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. J. B. Dawson, J. W. Barker, D. J. Ellis, et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 25, 695 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. G. Tinekov and V. G. Tinekov, Microstructure of Milk and Dairy Produce (Pishchevaya Promyshlennost’, Moscow, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. J. van Staveren, C. J. M. Moes, J. van Marle, et al., Appl. Opt. 30, 4507 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu. P. Sinichkin, S. P. Utts, and E. A. Pilipenko, Opt. Spektrosk. 80, 260 (1996) [Opt. Spectrosc. 80, 228 (1996)].

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yu. P. Sinichkin, S. R. Utts, L. E. Dolotov, et al., Radiotekhnika, No. 4, 77 (1997).

  26. D. A. Zimnyakov, V. V. Tuchin, and S. R. Utts, Opt. Spektrosk. 76, 838 (1994) [Opt. Spectrosc. 76, 747 (1994)].

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Jacques, www. omlc.ogu.edu.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Optika i Spektroskopiya, Vol. 92, No. 5, 2002, pp. 831–838.

Original Russian Text Copyright © 2002 by Zimnyakov, Sinichkin, Kiseleva, Agafonov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimnyakov, D.A., Sinichkin, Y.P., Kiseleva, I.V. et al. Effect of absorption of multiply scattering media on the degree of residual polarization of backscattered light. Opt. Spectrosc. 92, 765–771 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1481144

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1481144

Keywords

Navigation