Abstract
Expenditures for prescription drugs continue to increase, prompting insurers and health systems to adopt formulary or coverage policies restricting the use of more expensive drugs. Those establishing formulary policies face a complex array of claims regarding differences in efficacy, safety, treatment cost, or cost-effectiveness. We describe and illustrate 5 specific principles for applying research evidence to formulary decisions: (1) Experimental data should take precedence over models or simulations, and assumptions of such models should be carefully examined. (2) Morbidity or mortality outcomes should take precedence over surrogate or intermediate outcomes. (3) Claims for advantages of new treatments should consider the full range of alternatives rather than those selected by industry. (4) Variation in effects across individuals or subgroups argue against restrictions on first-line treatment, but only if those differences are predictable. (5) Variation in effects argues against requiring changes in ongoing treatment. We also discuss how economic incentives are likely to influence selection of research questions, especially research related to drug-gene interactions and to identifying new indications for existing drugs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Levit K, Smith C, Cowan C, Sensenig A, Catlin A. Health spending rebound continues in 2002. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23:147–59.
Moeller J, Miller G, Banthin J. Looking inside the nation’s medicine cabinet: trends in outpatient drug spending by Medicare benificiaries, 1997 and 2000: costly new drugs do have an impact on overall drug spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23:217–25.
National Institute for Health Care Management. Changing Patterns of Pharmaceutical Innovation. Washington, DC: National Institute for Health Care Management; 2002.
US Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. NDAs Approved in Calendar Years 1990–2002 by Therapeutic Potentials and Chemical Types. January 14, 2003. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/rdmt/pstable.htm. Accessed January 8, 2004.
Rosenthal M, Berndt E, Donohue J, Frank R, Epstein A. Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:498–505.
Vogel R, Ramachandran S, Zachry W. A 3-stage model for assessing the probable economic effects of direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceuticals. Clin Ther. 2003;25:309–29.
Huskamp H, Epstein A, Blumenthal D. The impact of a national prescription drug formulary on prices, market share, and spendin: lesson for Medicare? Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22:149–58.
Balkrishnan R, Byerly W, Camacho F, Shrestha A, Anderson R. Effect of prescription benefit changes on medical care utilization in a Medicare HMO population. Am J Manage Care. 2001;7:1093–100.
Huskamp H, Deverka P, Epstein A, Epstein R, McGuigan K, Frank R. The effect of incentive-based formularies on prescription-drug utilization and spending. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2224–32.
Goldman D, Joyce G, Escarce J, et al. Pharmacy benefits and the use of drugs by the chronically ill. JAMA. 2004;291:2344–50.
Daniels N, Teagarden J, Sabin J. An ethical template for pharmacy benefits. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22:125–37.
Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. E8.135 Cost Containment Involving Prescription Drugs In Health Plans. Code of Medical Ethics. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2003.
Burton S, Randel L, Titlow K, Emanual E. The ethics of pharmaceutical benefit management. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20:150–63.
Ganther-Urmie J, Nair K, Valuck R, McCollum M, Lewis S, Turpin R. Consumer attitudes and factors related to prescription switching decisions in multitier copayment drug benefit plans. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10:201–8.
American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Cost containment involving prescription drugs in health plans. In: Code of Medical Ethics. Current Opinions with Annotations. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2003.
Coalition Working Group. Principles of a Sound Drug Formulary System. Rockville, MD: US Pharmacopeia; 2000.
Fry R, Avey S, Sullivan S. The Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Formay for Formulary Submissions: an evolving standard—A Foundation for Managed Care Pharmacy Task Force report. Value Health. 2003;6:505–21.
Neumann P. Evidence-based and value-based formulary guidelines. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23:124–34.
Garber A.. Evidence-based coverage policy. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20:62–82.
Pellissier J, Straus W, Watson D, Kong S, Harper S. Economic evaluation of rofecoxib versus nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Clin Ther. 2001;23:1061–79.
Chancellor J, Hunsche E, de Cruz E, Sarasin F. Economic evaluation of celecoxib, a new cyclo-oxegenase-2 specific inhibitor, in Switzerland. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19:59–75.
Bombardier C, Laine L, Reicin A, et al. Comparison of upper gastro-intestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR study group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1520–8.
Hrachovec J, Mora M. Reporting of 6-month vs 12-month data in a clinical trial of celecoxib. JAMA. 2001;286:2398.
Juni P, Rutjes A, Dieppe P. Are selective COX 2 inhibitors superior to traditional non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs? Adequate analysis of the Class trial indicates that this may not be the case. BMJ. 2002;324:1287–8.
Villaba M, Li Q. Statisticial Reviewer Briefing Document for the Advisory Committee (Rofecoxib). Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/briefing/3677b2_04_stats.pdf. Accessed January 8, 2004.
Solomon D, Schneeweiss S, Glynn R, et al. Relationship between selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and acute myocardial infarction in older adults. Circulation. 2004;109:2068–73.
Juni P, Nartey L, Reichenbach S, Sterchi R, Dieppe P, Egger M. Risk of cardiovascular events and rofecoxib: cumulative meta-analysis. Lancet. 2004;364:2021–9.
Solomon S, McMurray J, Pfeffer M, et al. Cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib in a clinical trial for colorectal adenoma prevention. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1071–80.
Neumann P, Hermann R, Kuntz K, et al. Cost-effectiveness of donepezil n the treatment of mild or moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1999;52:1138–45.
O’Brien B, Goeree R, Hux M, et al. Economic evaluation of donepezil for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease in Canada. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47:570–8.
AD2000 Collaborative Group. Long-term donepezil treatment in 565 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD2000): randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2004;363:2105–15.
Fleming T, DeMets D. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:605–13.
Echt D, Liebson P, Mitchell L, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:781–8.
Psaty B, Lumley T, Furberg C. Meta-analysis of health outcomes of chlorthalidone-based vs. non-chlorthalidone-based therapies. JAMA. 2004;292:43–4.
Lumley T. Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2002;21:2313–24.
Psaty B, Lumley T, Furberg C, et al. Health outcomes associated with various antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents. JAMA. 2003;289:2534–44.
Kroenke K, West S, Swindle R, et al. Similar effectiveness of paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline in primary care: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2001;286:2947–55.
Williams J, Mulrow C, Chiquette E, Noel P, Aguilar C, Cornell J. A systematic review of newer pharmacotherapies for depression in adults: evidence review summary. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:743–56.
Thase M, Blomgren S, Birkett M, Apter J, Tepner R. Fluoxetine treatment of patients with major depressive disorder who failed initial treatment with sertraline. J Clin Psychiatry. 1997;58:16–21.
Zarate C, Kando J, Tohen M, Weiss M, Cole J. Does intolerance or lack of response with fluoxetine predict the same will happen with sertraline? J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57:67–71.
Simon G. Choosing a first-line antidepressant: equal on average does not mean equal for everyone. JAMA. 2001;286:3003–4.
Baluch W, Gardner J, Krauss R, Scholes D. Therapeutic interchange of conjugated and esterified estrogens in a managed care organization. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56:537–42.
Patel R, Gray D, Pierce R, Jarfari M. Impact of a therapeutic interchange from pravastatin to lovostatin in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Am J Manage Care. 1999;5:465–74.
Dossenbach M, Kratky P, Schneidman M, et al. Evidence for the effectiveness of olanzapine among patients nonresponsive and/or intolerant to risperidone. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62:28–34.
Weiden P, Simpson G, Potkin S, O’Sullivan R. Effectiveness of switching to ziprasidone form stable but symptomatic outpatients with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:580–8.
Melander H, Ahlqvist-Rastad J, Meijer G, Beermann B. Evidence b(i)ased medicine—selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications. BMJ. 2003;326:1171–5.
Antes G, Chalmers I. Under-reporting of clinical trials is unethical. Lancet. 2003;361:978–9.
Chan A, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr M, Gotzsche P, Altman D. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in ranomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 2004;291:2457–65.
Psaty B, Furberg C, Ray W, Weiss N. Potential for conflict of interest in the evaluation of suspected adverse drug reactions. JAMA. 2004;292:2622–31.
Brady K, Pearlstein T, Ansis G, et al. Efficacy and safety of sertraline treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000;283:1837–44.
Stein M, Liebowitz M, Lydiard R, Pitts C, Bushnell W, Gergel I. Paroxetine treatment of generalized social phobia (social anxiety disorder): a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;280:708–13.
Gelenberg A, Lydiard R, Rudolph R, Aguiar L, Haskins F, Salinas E. Efficacy of venlafaxine extended-release capsules in nondepressed out-patients with generalized anxiety disorder: a 6-month randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000;283:3082–8.
Furberg C, Psaty B. Should evidence-based proof of drug efficacy be extrapolated to a “class of agents”? Circulation. 2003;108:2608–10.
Laughren T. Comorbid mood disorders and medical illness: a food and drug administration perspective. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:195–9.
Haga S, Burke W. Using pharmacogenetics to improve drug safety and efficacy. JAMA. 2004;291:2869–71.
Murphy G, Kremer C, Rodrigues H, Schatzberg A. Pharmacogenetics of antidepressant medication intolerance. Am J Psychiat. 2003;160:1830–5.
Relman A, Angell M. America’s other drug problem: how the drug industry distorts medicine and politics. The New Republic. 2002;227:27–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dr. Psaty has provided expert testimony regarding safety of antihypertensive drugs. Dr. Simon has received research grants from Eli Lilly & Co., Solvay Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer Pharmaceuticals.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simon, G.E., Psaty, B.M., Hrachovec, J.B. et al. Principles for evidence-based drug formulary policy. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 964–968 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0232.x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0232.x