Brief report: Resident and faculty perceptions of conflict of interest in medical education
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
OBJECTIVE: To determine resident and faculty perceptions of the pharmaceutical industry’s influence on medical education.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Anonymous survey of categorical residents and faculty in the department of medicine at a large, Midwestern, urban, independent academic medical center.
MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-one residents (69.2%) and 196 faculty (75.7%) responded to the survey. Residents believed that a significantly higher percentage of primary care and subspecialist faculty receives industry income or gifts compared to faculty respondents. Many faculty, and to a significantly greater degree residents, indicated that income or gifts influence the teaching of both internal attending physicians and visiting faculty in a variety of educational settings. The majority of residents (61.7%) and faculty (62.2%) believed that annual income or gifts less than $10,000 could influence an attending physician’s teaching. Most residents (65.4%) and faculty (74%) preferred that lecturers report all financial relationships with industry regardless of which relationships the lecturer believes are relevant.
CONCLUSIONS: Most internal medicine residents and their faculty perceive that industry influences teaching in different educational settings, and want teachers to disclose all of their financial relationships with industry. This information may guide further development of policies and curricula addressing industry relationships within graduate medical education.
- Rosenthal MB, Berndt ER, Donohue JM, Frank RG, Epstein AM. Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:498–505. CrossRef
- Zarowitz BJ, Muma B, Coggan P, Davis G, Barkley GL. Managing the pharmaceutical industry-health system interface. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35:1661–8. CrossRef
- Brett AS, Burr W, Moloo J. Are gifts from pharmaceutical companies ethically problematic? A survey of physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2213–8. CrossRef
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Principles to Guide the Relationship Between Graduate Medical Education and Industry. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2002. Available at: http://www.acgme.org. Accessed September 7, 2004.
- Hopper JA, Speece MW, Musial JL. Effects of an educational intervention on residents’ knowledge and attitudes toward interactions with pharmaceutical representatives. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:639–42. CrossRef
- Office of Research Integrity, Department of Health and Human Services. Responsibility of Applicants for Promoting Objectivity in Research for Which PHS Funding Is Sought. 42CFR50, Revised October 1, 2000. Available at: http://ori.hhs.gov/policies/fedreg42cfr50.shtml. Accessed March 28, 2005.
- American Association of Medical Colleges. Task Force on Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research. Protecting Subjects, Preserving Trust, Promoting Progress—Policy and Guidelines for the Oversight of Individual Financial Interests in Human Subjects Research.. Washington, DC: American Association of Medical Colleges; December 2001.
- Drazen JM, Curfman GD. Financial associations of authors. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1901–2. CrossRef
- Dana J, Loewenstein G. A social science perspective on gits to physicians from industry. JAMA. 2003;290:252–5. CrossRef
- Kassirer JP, Angell M. Financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:570–1. CrossRef
- Wazana A. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: is a gift ever just a gifts? JAMA. 2000;283:373–80. CrossRef
- Orlowski JP, Wateska L. The effects of pharmaceutical firm enticements on physicians prescribing patterns. There’s no such thing as a free lunch. Chest. 1992;102:270–3.
- Johns MM, Barnes M, Florencio PS. Restoring blance to industry-academia relationships in an era of institutional financial conflicts of interest: promoting research while maintaining trust. JAMA. 2003;289:741–6. CrossRef
- Chren MM, Landefeld CS. Physicians’ behavior and their interactions with drug companies. A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary. JAMA. 1994;271:684–9. CrossRef
- McCormick BB, Tomlinson G, Brill-Edwards P, Detsky AS. Effect of restricting contact between pharmaceutical company representatives and internal medicine residents on posttraining attitudes and behavior. JAMA. 2001;286:1994–9. CrossRef
- Brief report: Resident and faculty perceptions of conflict of interest in medical education
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 20, Issue 4 , pp 357-359
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- conflict of interest
- medical education
- pharmaceutical industry
- Industry Sectors