Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 20, Issue 9, pp 830–836

What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? Learning from patient-reported incidents

Authors

    • Center for Patient SafetyDana-Farber Cancer Institute
    • Division of General Medicine and Primary CareBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    • Harvard Medical School
  • Odelya Pagovich
    • Sackler Medical SchoolTel Aviv University
  • Daniel Z. Sands
    • Division of General Medicine and Primary CareBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    • Harvard Medical School
    • Zix Corporation
  • Joseph M. Li
    • Division of General Medicine and Primary CareBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    • Harvard Medical School
  • Mark D. Aronson
    • Division of General Medicine and Primary CareBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    • Harvard Medical School
  • Roger B. Davis
    • Division of General Medicine and Primary CareBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    • Harvard Medical School
  • David W. Bates
    • Harvard Medical School
    • Division of General Internal MedicineBrigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Russell S. Phillips
    • Division of General Medicine and Primary CareBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    • Harvard Medical School
Original Article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0180.x

Cite this article as:
Weingart, S.N., Pagovich, O., Sands, D.Z. et al. J GEN INTERN MED (2005) 20: 830. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0180.x

Abstract

PURPOSE: Little is known about how well hospitalized patients can identify errors or injuries in their care. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to elicit incident reports from hospital inpatients in order to identify and characterize adverse events and near-miss errors.

SUBJECTS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 228 adult inpatients on a medicine unit of a Boston teaching hospital.

METHODS: Investigators reviewed medical records and interviewed patients during the hospitalization and by telephone 10 days after discharge about “problems,” “mistakes,” and “injuries” that occurred. Physician investigators classified patients’ reports. We calculated event rates and used multivariable Poisson regression models to examine the factors associated with patient-reported events.

RESULTS: Of 264 eligible patients, 228 (86%) agreed to participate and completed 528 interviews. Seventeen patients (8%) experienced 20 adverse events; 1 was serious. Eight patients (4%) experienced 13 near misses; 5 were serious or life threatening. Eleven (55%) of 20 adverse events and 4 (31%) of 13 near misses were documented in the medical record, but none were found in the hospital incident reporting system. Patients with 3 or more drug allergies were more likely to report errors compared with patients without drug allergies (incidence rate ratio 4.7, 95% CI 1.7, 13.4).

CONCLUSIONS: Inpatients can identify adverse events affecting their care. Many patient-identified events are not captured by the hospital incident reporting system or recorded in the medical record. Engaging hospitalized patients as partners in identifying medical errors and injuries is a potentially promising approach for enhancing patient safety.

Key Words

medical erroradverse eventpatient participationincident reporting
Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2005