Brief report: Patient-physician agreement as a predictor of outcomes
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a patient-physician agreement instrument predicts important health outcomes.
DESIGN: Three hundred eighty patients with back pain were enrolled in a comparison of rapid magnetic resonance imaging with standard x-rays. One month later, patients rated agreement with their physician in the following areas: diagnosis, diagnostic plan, and treatment plan. Outcomes included patient satisfaction with care at 1 and 12 months and functional and health status at 12 months.
SETTING: Urban academic and community primary care and specialty clinics.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Higher agreement at 1 month (using a composite sum of scores on the 3 agreement questions) was correlated in univariate analysis with higher patient satisfaction at 1 month (R=.637, P<.001). In multivariate analysis, controlling for 1-month satisfaction and other potential confounders, higher agreement independently predicted better 12-month patient satisfaction (β=0.188, P=.003), mental health (β=1.080, P<.001), social function (β=1.124, P=.001), and vitality (β=1.190, P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Agreement between physicians and patients regarding diagnosis, diagnostic plan, and treatment plan is associated with higher patient satisfaction and better health status outcomes in patients with back pain. Additional research is required to clarify the relationship between physician communication skills, agreement, and patient outcomes.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this article or this research.
This paper was presented at the 26th Annual SGIM Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia, May 2003.
This work was supported by Grants HS-09499 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and P60-AR48093 from the National Institute for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.
Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. From Compliance to Concordance. London: RPSG; 1997.
Bass MJ, Buck C, Turner L, Dickie G, Pratt G, Robinson HC. The physician’s actions and the outcome of illness in family practice. J Fam Pract. 1986;23:43–7.PubMed
Hermoni D, Borkan JM, Pasternak S, et al. Doctor-patient concordance and patient initiative during episodes of low back pain. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:809–10.PubMed
Temple W, Toews J, Fidler H, Lockyer JM, Taenzer P, Parboosingh EJ. Concordance in communication between surgeon and patient. Can J Surg. 1998;41:439–45.PubMed
Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient-Centered Medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
Von Korff M, Barlow W, Cherkin D, Deyo RA. Effects of practice style in managing back pain. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:187–95.
Steart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:796–804.
Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152:1423–32.
Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Gandek B, Rogers WH, Ware JE. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Int Med. 1996;124:497–504.PubMed
Jarvik JG, Hollingworth W, Martin B, et al. The Seattle lumbar imaging project: a randomized controlled trial of rapid MR vs. radiographs for patients with low back pain. JAMA. 2003;289:2863–5.CrossRef
- Brief report: Patient-physician agreement as a predictor of outcomes
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 20, Issue 10 , pp 935-937
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- physician-patient communication
- back pain
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash, USA
- 2. Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash, USA
- 3. Departments of Radiology and Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash, USA
- 4. Center for Cost and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Standford, Calif, USA
- 5. Department of Medicine and Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif, USA