Sins of omission
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the relative incidence of serious errors of omission versus errors of commission.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the most common substantive medical errors identified by medical record review.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Twelve Veterans Affairs health care systems in 2 regions.
PARTICIPANTS: Stratified random sample of 621 patients receiving care over a 2-year period.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Classification of reported quality problems.
METHODS: Trained physicians reviewed the full inpatient and outpatient record and described quality problems, which were then classified as errors of omission versus commission.
RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of patients had at least 1 error reported over a 13-month period. The average number of errors reported per case was 4.7 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 4.4, 5.0). Overall, 95.7% (95% CI: 94.9%, 96.4%) of errors were identified as being problems with under-use. Inadequate care for people with chronic illnesses was particularly common. Among errors of omission, obtaining insufficient information from histories and physicals (25.3%), inadequacies in diagnostic testing (33.9%), and patients not receiving needed medications (20.7%) were all common. Out of the 2,917 errors identified, only 27 were rated as being highly serious, and 26 (96%) of these were errors of omission.
CONCLUSIONS: While preventing iatrogenic injury resulting from medical errors is a critically important part of quality improvement, we found that the overwhelming majority of substantive medical errors identifiable from the medical record were related to people getting too little medical care, especially for those with chronic medical conditions.
- Tversky A, Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Q J Econ. 1991;106:1039–61. CrossRef
- Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;ALVII:263–91. CrossRef
- Kahneman D, Tversky A. The simulation heuristic. In: Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
- Spranca M, Minsk E, Baron J. Omission and commission in judgement and choice. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1991;27:76–105. CrossRef
- Ritov I, Baron J. Reluctance to vaccinate: omission bias and ambiguity. J Behav Decis Making. 1990;3:263–77.
- Asch DA, Baron J, Hershey JC, et al. Omission bias and pertussis vaccination. Med Decis Making. 1994;14:118–23. CrossRef
- Institute of Medicine. To Error is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
- Millenson ML. Pushing the profession: how the news media turned patient safety into a priority. Qual Safety Health Care. 2002;11:56–63.
- Dentzer S. Media mistakes in coverage of the Institute of Medicine’s error report. Eff Clin Pract. 2000;3:305–8.
- American Iatrogenic Association Library. Information that improves understanding of medical error, philosphy, and practice. Accessed February 21, 2004: http://www.iatrogenic.org/library/mederrorlib.html
- The Leapfrog Group. Patient safety. Accessed February 21, 2004: http://www.leapfroggroup.org/safety.htm
- Wachter RM, Shojania KG. Internal Bleeding: The Truth Behind America’s Terrifying Epidemic of Medical Mistakes. New York: Rugged Land. LLC; 2004.
- Brook RH. Quality of care: do we care? Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:486–90.
- Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA. 1998;280:1000–5. CrossRef
- Committee on Quality of Health Care in America: Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–6.
- Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care. 2000;38:261–71. CrossRef
- Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1556–64. CrossRef
- Hayward RA, Hofer TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. JAMA. 2001;286:415–20. CrossRef
- Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:377–84.
- Fisher ES, Welch HG. Is this issue a mistake? Eff Clin Pract. 2000;3:290–3.
- Hofer TP, Hayward RA. Are bad outcomes from questionable clinical decisions preventable medical errors?: a case of cascade iatrogenesis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:327–33.
- Hofer TP, Kerr EA, Hayward RA. What is an error? Eff Clin Pract. 2000;3:261–9.
- Caplan RA, Posner KL, Cheney FW. Effect of outcome on physician judgments of appropriateness of care. JAMA. 1991;265:1957–60. CrossRef
- Thompson SC, Armstrong W, Thomas C. Illusions of control, underestimations, and accuracy: a control heuristic explanation. Psychol Bull. 1998;123:143–61. CrossRef
- Hofer TP, Asch SM, Hayward RA, et al. Profiling quality of care: is there a role for peer review? BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4:9. CrossRef
- Goldman RL. The reliability of peer assessments of quality of care. JAMA. 1992;267:958–60. CrossRef
- Dovey SM, Meyers DS, Phillips RL Jr, et al. A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice. Qual Safety Health Care. 2002;11:233–8. CrossRef
- Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE prevention study group. JAMA. 1995;274:29–34. CrossRef
- Elder NC, Dovey SM. Classification of medical errors and preventable adverse events in primary care: a synthesis of the literature. J Fam Pract. 2002;51:927–32.
- McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–45. CrossRef
- Hofer TP, Bernstein SJ, DeMonner S, Hayward RA. Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality. Med Care. 2000;38:152–61. CrossRef
- Kent DM, Hayward RA, Griffith JL, et al. An independently derived and validated predictive model for selecting patients with myocardial infarction who are likely to benefit from tissue plasminogen activator compared with streptokinase. Am J Med. 2002;113:104–11. CrossRef
- Hayward RA. Diabetes care priorities: preventing cardiovascular complications. Pract Matters. 2000;5:1–6.
- Brook RH. Appropriateness: the next frontier. BMJ. 1994;308:218–9.
- Glasgow RE, Hiss RG, Anderson RM, et al. Report of the health care delivery work group: behavioral research related to the establishment of a chronic disease model for diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:124–30. CrossRef
- Wenger NS, Solomon DH, Roth CP, et al. The quality of medical care provided to vulnerable community-dwelling older patients. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Nov 4;139:740–7.
- Brennan TA. The Institute of Medicine Report on medical errors — could it do harm? N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1123–5. CrossRef
- Jha AK, Perlin JB, Kizer KW, Dudley RA. Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2218–27. CrossRef
- Asch SM, McGlynn EA, Hogan MM, et al. Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:938–45.
- Kerr EA, Gerzoff RB, Krein SL, et al. A comparison of diabetes care quality in VA and commercial managed care: the TRIAD study. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:272–81.
- O’Neil AC, Petersen LA, Cook EF, Bates DW, Lee TH, Brennan TA. Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:370–6.
- Bates DW, Leape LL, Petrycki S. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in hospitalized adults. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:289–94. CrossRef
- Brennan TA, Localio AR, Leape LL, et al. Identification of adverse events occurring during hospitalization. A cross-sectional study of litigation, quality assurance, and medical records at two teaching hospitals. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:221–6.
- Luck J, Peabody JW, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M, Glassman P. How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record. Am J Med. 2000;108:642–9. CrossRef
- Donabedian A. Quality, cost: choices and responsibilities. Inquiry. 1988;25:90–9.
- Donabedian A. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Administration Press; 1980.
- Woolf SH. Patient safety is not enough: targeting quality improvements to optimize the health of the population. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:33–6.
- Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000;320:768–70. CrossRef
- Reason JT. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Burlington, Vt: Ashgate Publishing.
- Perrow C. Normal Accidents Living with High-risk Technologies. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1999.
- Something must (not) be done. The Economist. September 11, 2003
- Vijan S, Hayward RA. Treatment of hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus: blood pressure goals, choice of agents, and setting priorities in diabetes care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:593–602.
- Rosen AB, Karter AJ, Liu JY, Selby JV, Schneider EC. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in high-risk clinical and ethnic groups with diabetes. J Gen Int Med. 2004;19:669–75. CrossRef
- Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93:635–41. CrossRef
- Sins of omission
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 20, Issue 8 , pp 686-691
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- quality of care
- adverse events
- patient safety
- medical errors
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Center of Excellence, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA
- 2. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA
- 4. Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Health Care System and the Division of General Internal Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles CA, and the Rand Health Program, Santa Monica, Calif, USA