Beyond the medical record
Other modes of error acknowledgment
Accepted: 04 January 2005 DOI:
Cite this article as: Rosenthal, M.M., Cornett, P.L., Sutcliffe, K.M. et al. J GEN INTERN MED (2005) 20: 404. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0098.x Abstract Studies before and since the 1999 Institute of Medicine report have noted the limitations of using medical record reporting for reliably quantifying and understanding medical error. Quantitative macro analyses of large datasets should be supplemented by small-scale qualitative studies to provide insight into micro-level daily events in clinical and hospital practice that contribute to errors and adverse events and how they are reported. BACKGROUND: The study design involved semistructured face-to-face interviews with residents about the medical errors in which they recently had been involved and included questions regarding how those errors were acknowledged. DESIGN: This paper reports the ways in which medical error is or is not reported and residents’ responses to a perceived medical error. OBJECTIVE: Twenty-six residents were randomly sampled from a total population of 85 residents working in a 600-bed teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Outcome measures were based on analysis of casers residents described. Using Ethnograph and traditional methods of content analysis, cases were categorized as Documented, Discussed, and Uncertain. MEASUREMENTS: Of 73 cases, 30 (41.1%) were formally acknowledged and Documented in the medical record; 24 (32.9%) were addressed through Discussions but not documented; 19 cases (26%) cases were classified as Uncertain. Twelve cases involved medication errors, which were acknowledged in different categories. RESULTS: The supervisory discussion, the informal discussion, and near-miss contain important information for improving clinical care. Our study also shows the need to improve residents’ education to prepare them to recognize and address medical errors. CONCLUSIONS: Key words medical error medical mistake medical error acknowledgement counting medical errors
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
This work was supported by grants from the Office of the Vice President for Research, University of Michigan (Log no. 4148, OVPR, December 21, 1999), and the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, University of Michigan—Dearborn, 2000.
Human Subjects Review Committee, University of Michigan—Dearborn, November 1, 1999; research site, Clinical Research Committee (R-98-477), November 30, 1999; Nondisclosure Agreement Between the University of Michigan and the research site, 1999.
Data protected under the State of Michigan Public Health Act, Section 333.215.
Download to read the full article text References
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To Error Is Human. Building a Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
. The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors—could it do harm? N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1123–5.
Becher EC, Chassin MR
. Improving quality, minimizing error: making it happen. Health Aff. 2001;20:68–81.
McDonald CJ, Weiner M, Hui SL
. Deaths due to medical errors are exaggerated in Institute of Medicine report. JAMA. 2000;284:93–5.
Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al.
Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–6.
Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird NM, et al.
The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:377–84.
Bates DW, Gawande AA
. Error in medicine: what have we learned? Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:763–7.
Barach P, Berwick DM
. Patient safety and the reliability of health care systems. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:997–8.
Barach P, Small SD
. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. Br Med J. 2000;320:759–63.
Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Brennan TA
. The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:812–6.
Hayward RA, Hofer TP
. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. JAMA. 2001;286:415–20.
Hofer TP, Kerr EA. What is an error? Eff Clin Pract. 2000;6:261–9.
. Understanding and responding to adverse events. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1051–6.
Leape L, Epstein AM, Hamel MB
. A series on patient safety. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1272–3.
Helmreich RL, Schaefer HG. Team performance in the operating room. In: Bogner MS, ed. Human Error in Medicine. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994:225–53.
Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM. Hospitals as cultures of entrapment. Calif Manage Rev. 2003;45:73–84.
Rosenthal M. The Incompetent Doctor: Behind Closed Doors. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 1995.
Reason J. Human Error. Oxford, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
Weick K. Organizational culture as a source of high reliability. Calif Manage Rev. 29:112–27.
. A death at Duke. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1083–4.
Gaba DM, Howard SK
. Fatigue among clinicians and the safety of patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1249–55.
Battles JB, Shea CE
. A system of analyzing medical errors to improve GME curricula and programs. Acad Med. 2001;76:125–33.
de Leval MR, Carthey J, Wright DF, Farewell VT, Reason JT
. Human factors and cardiac surgery: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:661–72.
Sorokin R, Claves JL, Kane GC, Gottlieb JE. The near miss resident conference; understanding the barriers to confronting medical errors. Semin Med Pract. 2002;5:12–9.
. Quality begets patient safety. Am J Surg. 2001;181:389–92.
Schmidt CE, Bottini T
. Improving medication safety and patient care in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs. 2003;29:12–6.
Biddle C, Oaster TRF
. Investigating the nature of the morbidity and mortality conference. Acad Med. 1990;65:420.
Feldman L, Barkun A, Sampalis J, Rosenberg L
. Measuring postoperative complications in general surgery patients using an outcomes-based strategy: comparison with complications presented at morbidity and mortality rounds. Surgery. 1997;122:711–9.
Harbison SP, Regehr G
. Faculty and resident opinions regarding the role of morbidity and mortality conference. Am J Surg. 1999;177:136–9.
Kinzie JD, Maricle RA, Bloom JD, et al.
Improving quality assurance through psychiatric mortality and morbidity conferences in a university hospital. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992;43:470–4.
Renfrew DL, Franken EA, Berbaum KS, Weigelt FH, Abu-Yousef MM
. Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 172 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology. 1992;183:145–50.
Shapiro J, Larsen K, Jacokes D
. The psychosocial M & M: a tool in reinterpreting problematic medical situations. Fam Med. 1990;22:437–42.
Thompson JS, Prior MA
. Quality assurance and morbidity and mortality conference. J Surg Res. 1992;52:97–100.
Zipper L, Cushman SW. Lessons in Patient Safety. Chicago, IL: National Patient Safety Foundation; 2001.
Webster’s New International Dictionary of the English Language. 2nd edition unabridged. Springfield, MA: G and G Merriam Company; 1961. Copyright information
© Society of General Internal Medicine 2005